04
Apr 2011
44 Comments
Windows 8 Secrets: Internet Explorer Immersive

Part three in a series of co-posts by Windows 8 Secrets co-authors Rafael Rivera and Paul Thurrott.

Windows 8′s worst-kept secret, perhaps, is that it will include a Windows Phone-inspired, Metro-like, tiles-based user interface as an alternative to the more mainstream Aero and Aero Lite (formerly Aero Basic) UIs. Aimed at small, touch-based devices like tablets and phones, this new UI, called Immersive, is also one of Windows 8′s most locked-down features. And in the recently leaked builds, it’s proven impossible, so far, to unlock.

One clue to the Immersive UI, however, exists in a new Immersive version of Internet Explorer, which looks and works much like Windows Phone’s IE Mobile, but uses the desktop IE 9 renderer. Currently, this application–which, oddly enough, is not currently implemented as a Windows Phone-style AppX application package like some other new Windows 8 apps–operates only at 640 x 480, and cannot be resized. It’s likely that this application is designed to run full screen only and that the limitations we’re currently seeing are because we’re running outside of its intended native Immersive environment.

Internet Explorer Immersive showing Bing homepage

Internet Explorer Immersive showing Bing homepage

There isn’t much to see yet, though the browser does work. Browser history is implemented similarly to tabs in IE Mobile, with square, simple thumbnails. But IE Immersive picks up some nice site colorization functionality from desktop IE 9 while displaying those tabs in the tabs screen.

Internet Explorer Immersive with History displayed

Internet Explorer Immersive with History displayed

– Rafael Rivera and Paul Thurrott

  • http://twitter.com/mcrommert Matthew Crommert

    sweet

  • anonymous

    I hope they will be at least one edition with everything “desktop” minus everything “tablet” so I can save some disk space.

    • anonymous

      Even if such an edition exists, it won’t probably save disk space because everything is installed in %windir%WinSxS and “projected” from there as hard links in the new disastrous design of the Windows servicing mechanism.

    • anonymous

      Even if such an edition exists, it won’t probably save disk space because everything is installed in %windir%WinSxS and “projected” from there as hard links in the new disastrous design of the Windows servicing mechanism.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1384620450 Nicola Mantovani

    who the hell cares about disk space in a 2011 DESKTOP computer? leave 40gigs to the OS and let it live peacefully? stop micromanaging stuff guys, just stop.

    • http://www.facebook.com/luisjs92 Luis Jacobetty

      Some folks (like me) with SSDs might be concerned.

      • http://www.facebook.com/mrpmpfan Steven Smith

        You’re the fool with a small SSD. Meanwhile I have a nice 1 TB Harddrive which I bought for a hell of a lot less. Enjoy your 3 seconds of extra time tool.

      • Guest

        you are a moron steve, ssd is the future and all because you are too cheap or too young to be able to afford one, doesn’t mean squat. its alot more than an extra 3 seconds in any drive-to-drive comparison and the bigger gain is w/ app installs, app start, etc. no way you can make a legit arg against an SSD to your antiquated spinning drive, no way, no how, other than price per gb. so yes, you are an idiot.

    • http://www.facebook.com/luisjs92 Luis Jacobetty

      Some folks (like me) with SSDs might be concerned.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1384620450 Nicola Mantovani

    who the hell cares for disk space in a 2010+ desktop pc? give 40 gigs to the os, or more if you use app that do not give options about where to install, and never care again for the OS disk space…

    • anonymous

      Those who have expensive SSDs with lots of programs and games to run care.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1384620450 Nicola Mantovani

        so, you buy expensive stuff, lots of games, and you can’t afford, like, 10 more GB for the installation? that’s silly.

      • http://blogghh.wordpress.com Herschel

        Nicola, just because you are on the back-end of the technology curve doesn’t mean WE are. SSD’s are pretty damn expensive so the space issue is valid. Having a SSD makes a lot of sense in a lot of use case scenarios.

        Just because you can’t think of all them doesn’t mean they are not valid. Open your eye and your mind and things might become a little clearer.

      • http://www.facebook.com/mrpmpfan Steven Smith

        The benefits do not outweigh the cost for SSD’s at the moment. I am sorry but just to make you look like an idiot.

        On tigerdirect.com a 128 gb SSD Drive came up at $244.99 where as a 2 tb harddrive came up at $159.99.

        Now comes the part where you want to explain to me why I should pay $100 more for a 20th of the space? How many honest to goodness seconds to you really save in your precious wasted life?

      • better smoother faster

        Many people like to play games in their computers. SSDs completely and utterly beat the fuck out of your ancient spinning piece of crap. The only thing they are good for anymore is storage. Get used to it,.

      • Guest

        my SSD is critical for getting work done, got tired of everytime i started an app, having to wait 30 seconds for it to spin up, got tired of everytime i come out of sleep or reboot, it takes 2-3 minutes for everything to start up…it’s all literally instant w/ the SSD. i can’t wait on 3 instances of SQL server, 1 oracle, and my dev environment every time i sleep/restart. as mentioned before, you are a dunce steve!

      • Tony

        The 2TB drive is hard to beat for good media/file STORAGE. But for applications SSDs dominate – quiet, you don’t have to alter the settings that let your drives spin down when not in use, less power, aren’t going to break if you bump your computer…etc plus a single SSD in sata2 is FAR FASTER than two 10,000rpm drives in a sata2 raid. Performance comes at a cost.

      • Guest

        just wanted to say. Steve…your a giant douche. Must be some stupid help desk tech making 8.50/hr….ya, you haven’t a clue what ssd do or their exceptional uses….again —> DOUCHE

  • contextfree

    Wonder if anyone has actually tried installing the Win8 leaked builds on a touch tablet?

  • Madraven

    Maybe it’s just proof that they are merging windows phone 7 into Windows and they are rebuilding its UI on top of the NT kernel.

  • Adam Shaw

    I still cant wait to get my hands on this one when it goes beta. Then we will see how things shape up.

  • Anonymous

    Very handsome UI. Kudos to the design team for keeping the purity of Metro intact.

  • http://www.about.me/mattauckland Matt Auckland

    Looks interesting. I remember beta testing Vista and Windows 7 in the early stages, the early 64 bit version where a little flakey.

    Has this made it onto connect to the wider beta community yet, or is it still restricted to partners? Must admit I haven’t seen it yet.

    • Anonymous

      From what I’ve read this has only gone out to very select partners. Community beta is expected around September.

  • Anonymous

    Are you serious… so now Microsoft wants to bring the “feel of the smartphone” back to the desktop, just like Apple? Its awesome, but I hope they do it right, and it doesen’t come in conflict with Aero…

    • kmitchell3

      Except that the “feel of the smartphone” in Apple devices is worth bringing back to the Mac …

      • Anonymous

        Quit being a hater, I love the fill of windows phone 7

      • Kevin Chavez

        feel*

      • Kevin Chavez

        Agree. I dont necessarily mean windows phones UI is not good, but the “feel” refers to way more than just the style of the buttons. Its how the whole interface works: the animations, the concepts of autosave, restore the state of your apps after shutdown, the way of browsing your apps… etc.

        It will be quite interesting to see how the desktop evolves in the following years actually, I was starting to think PC’s (as in Personal Computers, not just windows but mac also) UI and experience couldn’t change much more…

  • Anonymous

    I sincerely hope they don’t bring the ‘orrible Metro UI scrolling-hell to W8 and built in proper UX for various interaction styles.

  • http://www.facebook.com/mikeydc Mikey Diazdel Castillo

    Naughty, naughty…W’Secrets guys! =p

  • http://webhostingreview.info/cheap-hosting/ smithon

    well said Nicola

  • Albert Ben Collin

    It looks to me that this IE9 is not the one intended for the desktop, but for the device, which will come out soon. They might be experiencing on sync of both platforms. This might explain the 640×480 limitation.

  • Anonymous

    Man that’s ugly.

  • Xxx-sms

    social mirdobra.com.ua

  • Dclarke197

    Is osx lion out yet it looks so mutch better than windows.

  • the1macerd®

    OS X Lion won’t be out till summer 2011. If you ask me, Microsoft should ditch the code for Internet Explorer and start from scratch, by developing a browser people actually want to use without worrying about what could happen to their computers. Why do you think many people switch to Firefox, Chrome, Opera, Safari, etc., instead of using Internet Explorer?

  • Brandy

    I really hope this is not the direction they go. Windows 7 phone is bad enough. Perhaps they are trying to drive all IE users away?

  • PornMan

    very bad

  • Rudy

    ew?

  • Butt

    What just happened there?

  • http://thetechnologycafe.com Sam Z Best!