02
Apr 2011
271 Comments
Windows 8 Secrets: Windows Explorer Ribbon

Part two in a series of co-posts by Windows 8 Secrets co-authors Rafael Rivera and Paul Thurrott.

When Microsoft introduced the Ribbon user interface as a replacement for the overgrown menus and toolbars in Microsoft Office 2007, many were shocked. The change was audacious for such a mature software product, and it completely blew away years of ingrained shortcuts and skills. But the Ribbon UI was also innovative, and useful, and it provided a way to make previously hidden functionality far more discoverable. It was so successful, in fact, that Microsoft began adding it to other products, including the Windows Live Essentials apps and, in Windows 7, both Paint and WordPad.In Windows 8, Ribbon usage is accelerating again, and Microsoft’s next major OS will include this UI in the most visible of all possible places, Windows Explorer. In early builds of Windows 8, this Ribbon UI is only half-finished and, frankly, of dubious value. In fact, based on the divergent ways in which various related UI elements are repeated around the window frame, we get the idea that the use of the Ribbon in Explorer is, in fact, quite controversial inside the halls of Microsoft’s Redmond campus.

win8_ribbon_01

In Windows 8, the Windows Explorer shell sports a new Ribbon UI.
(Note: Obviously, all of the Ribbon icons shown here are placeholders. These are early days.)

If Microsoft goes through with this change, the Ribbon will replace the menu and toolbar in today’s Explorer windows, and as in Office, it will make many more features visibly discoverable, albeit at the expense of onscreen real estate and, we think, attractiveness.

win8_m23_ribbons

Various Explorer Ribbon tabs.

As with Office 2010, there are various dynamic Ribbon tabs that can appear as well, including Library Tools (when viewing Libraries), Picture Tools (when one or more image files are selected), and Disk Tools (in Computer view), among others.

win8_ribbon_02win8_ribbon_03

Examples of dynamic Ribbons in the Windows 8 shell.

You can also hide the Ribbon, which might explain why a few view style choices are duplicated in the status bar. (Another theory is that these items are there to accommodate other UI types like Aero Lite–formerly called Aero Basic–and Immersive, the tiles-based UI that is based on the Windows Phone "Metro" look and feel.)

win8_m23_ribbon_menuwin8_m23_statusbar

A hidden Ribbon (with dynamic Disk Tools tab), and a close-up view of the status-based based view style toggles.

And as with other Ribbon UIs, Explorer’s Ribbon now sports a new File menu that, like the one in Office 2010, is pretty expansive.

win8_m23_ribbon_menu

The Explorer Ribbon Find menu.

In the current pre-release builds we’ve seen, the Ribbon is a serious work in progress and is quite unattractive. It’s unclear whether Microsoft intends to move forward with this UI as-is, or whether it will appear only in certain UI types. Based on what we’re seeing, however, it does seem that there will at least be a toggle to disable this top-heavy UI. So if you don’t like the Ribbon in Windows Explorer, hopefully you’ll be able to turn it off.

– Rafael Rivera and Paul Thurrott

  • motwera

    yuck , looks HORRIBLE >.<

    • http://thenonhacker.deviantart.com thenonhacker

      [quote=TRC said,]What a cluttered mess.[/quote]

      My suggestions to Microsoft:

      1. At least use the Ribbon style of Office 2011, where the glass blends into the Ribbon Tabs area. It will reduce the clutter effect.

      2. Ok, the Title Bar has the Quick Access Toolbar, with Back, Forward, Up. Why not include the Address Bar and Search Box there as well? Then leave some space for dragging with the Title Bar. After that, you can remove the toolbar below the Ribbon.

      3. So that Status Bar is back in exchange for the Details Pane. Why not RETAIN the Details Pane, and then, add the VIEW controls at the bottom right of it? This maintais consistency between Win 7 and Win 8.

    • UI Designer

      I’ll still be using Directoty Opus then! :)
      http://www.gpsoft.com.au/

      • user

        How is that not fugly?

    • James

      Remember that this is a VERY early version. The ribbon might not even stay. If they change the layout and look (which is almost certain) it should be pretty helpful.

    • SimpleM

      I think it is the orange color that makes it so ugly. It MIGHT not be AS bad if it were something else.

      • Anonymous

        the orange is a placeholder.

  • Scott

    Ugly, ugly, ugly! The ugliest UI I’ve ever seen. But I’m happy to know that is only an early build. Well, I hope they’ll improve until it gets out.

    • KElly

      ugly ugly ugly! And I am so sick of glass. I would rather have windows classic from xp than the same old hideous. I downloaded xp redesign from deviantart and way better looking than what Microsoft now has to offer.

      • Anonymous

        this is an extremely early build, and will prob look nothing like this.

  • http://tnm2.wordpress.com tnm

    Thanks for sharing these. Kinda ugly, and takes up way too much space. I think I’m gonna hide the ribbon when the time comes. Sadly that image is mixed up. Please fix it, i think most of us will be interested in that.

  • http://twitter.com/astroXP Jose D.

    Even though I love the Ribbon in programs like Office, I’m not sure what to say about the implementation for Explorer :/

    Where is the details pane by the way? I hope they don’t remove it ! :(

  • James

    I’m not sure if Metro and Ribbon will combine well. If this is early stuff then it might be dropped altogether. Or look completely different. I guess well see in a couple of months.

  • tN0

    No way! I can’t believe this!
    The Ribbon was designed to make complex applications simpler. But it only works for document oriented apps like Office, Paint or WordPad where you create or modify files, where you work with different scenarios on one document like writing, adding and sharing. It never really worked in Windows Photo Gallery. And in Windows Explorer it would add even more complexity. There is nothing wrong with the context sensitive Command Bar in 7′s Explorer. The Ribbon is just the wrong thing for a browser-like app for “exploring” files instead of creating complex files.

    If this is true, I’m really shocked that they already implemented the Ribbon in such a complete way. It should have been clear that’s a terrible idea even just on paper. Compare this with the UI from IE9!

    As a power user I never needed the classic menu in Explorer since Vista beta. They just need to kill it and give us keyboard shortcuts for the Command Bar.

    Looking at the screen shots: How often am I supposed to toggle the view of file extensions? 15 times a day?

    It is horrible and it seems to come from a different Microsoft that didn’t created the Metro design language.

    • floopydoodle

      I for one would love the ability to quickly hide and unhide hidden files. I don’t like seeing hidden system folders and thumbs.db and desktop.ini files. But It would be great to easily unhide them for tweaking stuff. Obviously this is a very rough version, judging from all the placeholder icons. The command bar would look better above the ribbon, blended into the caption bar IE9 style.
      So, yay for Explorer ribbon if you ask me.

    • http://www.withinwindows.com/ Danielle Von Dockham

      I agree with your point, tN0. The introduction of the ribbon into Explorer’s windows is a clear case of a solution looking for a problem. And as Rafa and Paul note, there has to be some fierce controversy within Redmond to this change.

      I hope, though, that the conflict doesn’t get itself boiled down to a too-simple argument of conservative (keep the existing UI cause it’s useful and workable and familiar) versus liberal (change the UI using one of the features that has proven to be helpful in other contexts).

  • uus831

    I think this will make more features easily discoverable.

  • Asgaro

    I think this is a good direction. Household users will get to know the more advanced and useful features which now aren’t easily accessible.

    But the ribbon should have the option to become invisible.

    • tN0

      Could you give an example? I only see things that are already visible or available with a single click on “Organize”. But I see many things that are there more than once. Like the refresh button: who would open the view tab and select “Refresh” when there already is such a button beside the address bar?

      I know it is early but I think this is the wrong direction they are moving. Instead they could add buttons to the “Organize” menu like Google did on the single menu in Chrome and they could add a pop up menu that fades in when you select a file (like that one in Word when you select text).

      • Asgaro

        Hmm yeah, actually after looking a bit closer, I agree with you.
        There aren’t that much things to discover if a ribbon was implemented.

        A “Organize” button would be better indeed, at least if it’s implemented like Chrome’s and not like Firefox’s. Chrome’s is a lot bigger and the buttons aren’t “punched together”, and also not too many submenu’s.

  • Asbjørn

    WHAT? A ribbon in Explorer. Has Microsoft gone crazy? That is a seriously bad idea and I’m shocked that someone has actually taken the time to implement it. The Ribbon is for document focused applications, not for a file manager. The Explorer in Win 7 is just fine (although there’s always room for improvement).

  • razziatore

    Apple fans will laugh so hard if that thing will be kept in final.

    • tatose

      finder on OSX on all levels is still far inferior to explorer on XP and Win7 . What to laugh at?

      • razziatore

        That’s not a matter of features. It’s a matter of aesthetics. Current Windows Explorer is clean, Finder is clean, that s… above is all but clean.

      • Dr. Insano

        On the contrary, I find the Windows Explorer inferior to the Finder. You can’t for example expand and see the contents of several folders in Windows Explorer. Quite annoying.

    • Alex

      Yep, already laughing. Thank God I switched to OS X last year. Where Apple keeps moving in the direction of simplification while still adding features, Microsoft is going in the direction of new features at extremely heavy cost of complexity. Sure, you and I are software engineers or some other kind of geek and we can figure this out, but do you think your grandma can handle this ribbon interface? My eyes are scattering looking at it!

      I agree finder needs a bit of help, and in Lion it is significantly better (I used Lion preview), yet without looking anymore complex. Magic.

      It’s OK, 2 years down the road Microsoft will steal from OS X as usual.

  • watisthis

    NOOO! The ribbon is only good for programs that have MANY option items. EXPLORER HAS HARDLY ANY BUTTONS RIGHT NOW SO A RIBBON WILL ONLY COMPLICATE THINGS! MOST OF THE RIBBON BUTTONS CAN USUALLY BE EXECUTED BY RIGHT CLICKING A SPECIFIC FILE!

  • Jonathan Doe

    So let me get this straight, you’re writing an article about a Windows 8 feature (the ribbon) based upon an alpha stage version via illegally leaked code.

    Great journalism guys, this really helps Microsoft with Windows 8 development.

    Shame on you.

    Anon. (I don’t work for Microsoft)

    • Jose

      It’s their job Jonathan Doe to report anything concerning Windows development that may be of relevance. People are very curious & Microsoft did release Windows 8 Milestone 3 to a limited number of partners. This is news. As customers & enthusiasts, we have a right to know about upcoming products & their development.

      I think it’s wrong to criticize them for doing their jobs. Keep up the great work Raphael & Paul. Ignore this guy or girl, we want this information. If Microsoft won’t talk, then keep digging to get us the real information, before we have to support users in beta.

  • cuz84d

    This has got to go.. Im sorry Steven S!. much love!

  • http://www.liveside.net kip

    The widening spread of Ribbon usage across MS products makes more sense when you think of it for what it is: a giant banner ad for Office. The idea here is not to simplify Explorer (which really doesn’t need it) but to provide a consistant and comfortable experience, one that builds on Office familiarity, and visa versa.

  • http://davepermen.net davepermen

    If they hold on it, then PLEASE use backstage view instead of a random-sized menu. it’s the best change from 2007 to 2010 imho, and would make it look much more consise.

    i personally would love the ribbon. i have it hidden in my office apps, and they look very clean then. word looks like a futuristic notepad (and somehow is, with much more features).

    lets see how it progresses instead of crying “omg ribbon explorer”.

  • http://davepermen.net davepermen

    Oh, and, I love the quick way to switch hidden files on and off. Missed this since years. If they get away with having no dialog windows in explorer afterwards, I’m all for it, actually.

    Maybe they could change the design a bit, making it less business, more homeuser friendly. But as it’s early, that can all still happen.

  • Nathan

    This is so awesome. It will get rid of all the options that have been hidden in dialogs. I am sure it will be collapsible for power users. I also like the idea of the tabs. Programs will probably be able to take advantage of the ribbon and add their own tabs. For example if 7zip could just become a new tab. No need for 7zip to have a explorer-like interface of its own, if it can integrate into Windows Explorer as a ribbon. Lots of possiblites. Of course it looks ugly now because the icons are there, etc, but all it needs is a bit of polishing. As kip said, I am also definately looking to a more consistent, discoverable user interface in Windows 8!

    • Mick Russom

      Stupid people like you making sure Apple continues to grow.
      Been using computers since the early 80s and people like you are making the computer less of a tool and more of a toy. You are making computers for stupid people because you are stupid. You get more stupid market share, but you make it less of a tools.

      Thanks. Be sure to tweet and say WINNING on it.

      • Stefan

        Oh Mick, what a mature post. You’re stupid, because you are stupid… good argumentation you have there.

        Fact is that a lot of people don’t know about useful features simply because they are afraid to use a menu. If something takes two clicks they’re afraid to try. And even if people know how to find stuff in the menu, it can still be a pain. E.g. I hate having to work with dialog boxes simply because I want to quickly check whether there are hidden files in a folder.

        If you minimize the ribbon it looks the same as a menu until you click on it and then it shows you all useful options in one go, no need to go into dialog boxes and scroll options, etc. It’s not a toy, it’s usability. Just because it’s easy to use doesn’t mean it’s for stupid people, just for people who don’t know every possibility or who like to access things quickly. And again, when you minimize the ribbon it’s just the same as a menu bar.

  • tN0

    I love the Ribbon, too. But not on every app. Minimizing the Ribbon in this form would make it look like the Explorer now but without providing functionality. Sure, a hidden interface looks very clean. But every action would take at least two clicks.

    • Mick Russom

      Stupid people like you making sure Apple continues to grow. They know how to balance an idea and get ideologically crazy about it.
      Been using computers since the early 80s and people like you are making the computer less of a tool and more of a toy. You are making computers for stupid people because you are stupid. You get more stupid market share, but you make it less of a tool.

      Thanks. Be sure to tweet and say WINNING on it.

  • Panda X

    Even though I don’t like it, I might be able to get used to it. However the NavBar looks really horrible under the Ribbon. If they were to move Back, Forward, and Up into the Ribbon’s toolbar inside the caption bar that would look better. However no idea where the address bar and search box would go. If it also went into the caption bar it’d look bad unless they made it work some how.

  • Panda X

    Actually now that I take a second look the circles in that tool bar are highlighted consistently with the navigation buttons. Is that what they’re for or is it just a coincidence?

    • tN0

      I guess these are the undo and redo icons.

  • Jordan

    I honestly don’t know why they didn’t first go for something akin to IE9 with the context-sensitive single bar of Vista/7′s Explorer. The Ribbon doesn’t really work in Explorer, mostly due to its screen real estate usage.

    That said, the status bar icons are a good move.

    • Mick Russom

      IE9 sucks. Hard. Uninstalled. Its even worse than FireFox4. All bad half assed lame clones of Chrome.

  • http://www.quppa.net Quppa

    1. Far too top-heavy.
    2. Replacing the Details Pane with a status bar might save some vertical space, but a lot of useful information is lost in the process.
    3. The Scenic Ribbon needs a face-lift. The Office 2010 ribbon is much more attractive.
    4. All these screenshots seem to confirm that the ‘Up’ button will make a return. How amusing: ‘In addition to making the address bar an even better tool for navigating ‘up’ in Explorer… It also avoids introducing any more redundant buttons to the Explorer frame and hence taking away any more screen space from being able to see your address.’ (http://blogs.msdn.com/b/e7/archive/2009/03/13/a-few-more-changes-from-beta-to-rc.aspx)

  • anonymous

    And why do you Windows enthusiasts get exclusive special treatment and access to early builds? Aren’t others equally enthusiastic as well about the next version of Windows?

  • Sterling

    Well, at least the Delete button is back on the toolbar and not hidden (like in Windows 7) but the Address/Search bars look way out of place. If anything, the Address/Search bar(s) should work like in WLPG.

    • Fadsfasdf

      So many useless things… The Delete button was always there, it was on your keyboard… Whole hardware button dedicated to it!

  • cultz3D

    Another useless interface change for sake of change that yields nothing but forces users to adapt and “move forward”. Thankfully, there will be a way to disable this abomination.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=670105580 Phil Chan

    Next: Windows Calculator with Ribbon UI!: http://i.msdn.microsoft.com/dynimg/IC208972.png

    • tN0

      Muhahaha…

      Uhm, well, in some way it seems they wanne do exactly that with Explorer. Instead of doing this they should implement the Ribbon in the Microsoft Expression programs, maybe in Visual Studio.

    • razziatore

      They’ve already done something about: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Math

    • Ken

      I hope that is a joke! Imagine how many clicks it would take to do something like sin(x^2).

  • Tryllz

    ugly, i was hopin more frmo MS on UI, and was gettin excited tat MS gona pull this one better but seems MS is gonna screw this one…

    If this goes ahead, imo straightup fire ballmer…

  • AsSeN

    Nice… Just thinking that everyone’s thinking that it’s ugly. Still… This is a pre-beta version of windows 8 right? So I think that the GUI will change though. :D

  • gawicks

    Ribbon UI is overkill for something like the explorer The UI bits need to be simply out of the way like in IE.
    Lets take the Home tab ; we have cut ,copy ,paste,delete,properties,new folder ,select all etc etc. All these can be done using a context menu .why do you need a big toolbar for that?
    but On the plus side it exposes a lot a functionality and If the ribbon is hidden by default like the menu bar most users won’t fret

  • timiteh

    Well the use of the Ribbon on explorer could be interesting but this Ribbon seriously needs some improvements such as:
    * A smaller size (just on 2 Lines rather than on 4 Lines)
    * Either more tabs to spread items on fewer Lines or a Metro like horizontal scrolling for each tab
    * A more appealing design

  • riseagain

    Please Don’t add Rabbon UI to windows 8 it looks awful for a desktop and laptops
    its good for applications not for windows explorer

    i really dont like it at all

  • http://www.bejiitaswrath.com John Cartwright

    This looks more space grabbing than the Windows 7 menu bars, but this will probably be tweaked before release. I hope.

  • http://elgard-et-elgard.com/ Lau

    !

    …and still no tab browsing in explorer.
    same experience since win3.1 huhuuuu

  • mm

    To all the people whining up there
    Ribbon interface will take more space BUT it will expose more feature and take fewer pixel precise clicks (READ; TABLET FRIENDLY)..

    • Mick Russom

      Ribbon sucks. You are trying to make pretend interfaces that you see on Star Trek, but they are not useful tools. You people who FORCE this ribbon crap suck.

      • tatose

        Ribbons -> One way to facilitate better touchscreen experience, not the best, but it still better than what it is on Win7 right now.

        They just need to make it prettier, and refine the dimensions according to ‘real working scenarios/use-cases’

  • http://www.nwoolls.com Nate

    What would Jensen Harris say?

  • Sentinel24

    Man that looks ugly. Too much wasted space.

    Though probably a good concept. They should implement something utilizing the same ideology but in a very different manner.

  • Mick Russom

    On OS X now Microsoft. Your Ribbon SUCKS and your RIbbon fetish leaves me no choice but to leave your retarded moronic Ribbon obsession. Office 2011 Mac is so much better due to the old menus being available.

    GOOD BYE.

    • http://www.danielsteiner.net Ludacris

      You actually know that this is 1) a PreBeta Release of an upcomming operating system 2) not proven to be used in final, it could be a case study aswell, as all those builds that are floating around expect for 7971 are internal betas that are used to test and develop new stuff for windows and 3) Office 2011 for Mac uses Ribbon aswell. Also, you can easily write VBS to convert ribbon in office 2010 or 2007 to the stoneage look of office 9x-2003. Alternatively you can still use Open / Libre / Star Office or anything similar to that

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_X4BK5RMTOY4BOJMCO6N5BU4QM4 Christopher

        RE: 3)
        Yes, Office 2011 for Mac has the ribbon… IN ADDITION TO ALL THE NORMAL OLD-STYLE MENUS. You get both by default, and the ribbon is completely optional. You can disable it and have just menus with all the office 2011 goodness on the Mac. Not possible on the Windows version of office unless you want to run scripts and plugins. You get only the ribbon by default there.

  • Andrew

    I think this feature is unnecessary but I do see the point how it could work for a tablet since double clicking has always been a problem with touch (or pen, takes waaay too long) and obviously there are no keyboard shortcuts. Also, this would help my older parents use the computer. They can use Office pretty well but it’s hard for them to navigate Explorer since all the options are in a right-click menu (something they don’t understand, even creating a new folder is hard for them after I’ve explained it 9999999 times). I personally wouldn’t care one way or the other.

  • iKjetil

    I can’t believe how much negative opinions there are. Only time will tell if it is a success or not. I believe it will give us a lot more functionality more easily available. I hope they at least keep the ribbon into beta so we can try it out in practise.

  • Jote

    Interesting, but not the most elegant. I think the key is that the ribbon is quite high. It does not matter in apps like Word/Excel which most of people run in maximized windows. I don’t think that much people use Explorer in maximized window though. I don’t.

  • Jason

    As a couple of the more astute posters have already pointed out, Microsoft are clearly thinking along the Windows everywhere line by implementing a more finger / stylus friendly interface. I for one would welcome it whole-heartedly provided it is 1) prettied up and 2) is intelligent enough to detect that no keyboard or mouse is available and touch control is, then makes the appropriate UI the default option (with the ability to manually select an alternative). Everyone and their mother quite rightly criticises MS on the horrible touch interface in current versions of Windows.Now they look like they may be doing something about it. And the haters are still attacking. No wonder MS don’t want to release this stuff publicly. The nay-sayers will rubbish it without critiquing it in context. Let’s wait to hear what they’re planning and see a more complete version before reaching a conclusion, shall we?

  • Merneith

    I think everyone should just relax and give them a chance to finish it. And I agree with Andrew ~ my Dad was a fighter pilot in WWII and flew private jets for years before retiring and I never could make him understand the folder heirarchy system even while sitting there using his old filing cabinet as a comparison.

    Probably everyone reading this page is a “power user,” but don’t we all still know people who don’t know how to copy and paste? Just yesterday a friend of mine said his Dad finally bought a laptop but told him, “Don’t put that Facebook on my computer!” This guy is maybe 60, but still doesn’t even have a concept of what the internet is!

    I’m all for anything that makes computers (and tablets) more accessible and useful to everyone. I’m sure they will put options in there for all of us computer nerds to play with ~ the ones the general populace will never even know are there!

    If you don’t like Microsoft there are plenty of other options out there, but don’t bash them too hard ~ where would we be today without them and the ongoing rivalry with Apple? I still remember getting our first VIC-20 and being excited because we could program it to add 4+4 (which we obviously could have done in our heads…..).

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodore_VIC-20

  • Mina

    Nice, but what happened with statusbar?

  • Greg C

    In my opinion the current explorer UI in Windows 7 is a mess of various styles. The ribbon will help clean this up.

    + 1 for the ribbon idea

    • Braden

      As a desktop power user I do think it takes up a little to much space, and i’m happy with right click etc. But remember this is targeted at the average consumer, and needs to be more touch friendly. I have witnessed first hand many less experienced computer users do not like to right click (also what if a device doesn’t have a right click?). Anyway it seems you can collapse the ribbon when required, and still have access to primary options (and I guess all right click commands will still work). So ribbon haters shouldn’t get to upset, you can hide it all the time, or even expand it to quickly access show extensions, then hide it again. Or even if your a power user and happen to be using a tablet rather than a desktop system, this ribbon may actually help in some instances. I see this move as a nautral progression to merge and consolidate functions found in the context senstive menu and many useful tools that got left behind in the classic menu. So this is additional refinement, another pass after Windows 7 layer of shine on Vista.
      As a general concept it is quite exciting, because imagine third party applications adding more dynamic ribbons directly to the Windows shell.
      So I love the concept, but it definately needs work to make it feel right – and this is pre-alpha so i’m sure it will turn out good – but it will be challenge with the amount of functionality to get it looking sleek.

  • Braden

    As a additional note, because some people would consider adding the ribbon “dumbing” Windows down, it would be good to add some more advanced functionality exposed by the Ribbon. I would love to see a tool like “Advanced Rename”, where you could add number increments to files, rename extensions, and if necessary copy the files to a new location (with there new name) (similar to batch rename in Adobe Bridge). One other handy thing would be to Collapse folders, thus bringing all files below it to the present folder hierachy level.

    I honestly think adding some advanced functionality would make everyone happy, even ribbon haters.

  • Allen

    Looks like I switched to Mac just in time!!! Whew!!!

  • Braden

    There will be always those who either prefer OSX or Windows – I have already had my OSX stage, and decided to return what I find to be better OS. I wish OSX had a decent breadcrumb bar, and doesn’t really have the virtual folder concept (libraries and home folders link to other locations), also until Lion, OSX hasn’t had much in the way of organising files and folders by flags or filters (though even then, Win 7 still looks to be more advanced). Point is adding a ribbon is not going to kill Windows, there are already many unique nice features. I applaud Microsoft for at least trying to create a new paradigm for menu design over the last 4 or so years, while Apple sticks to classic menu designs with little innovation.

    I see some of the features of Lion going down a extremely streamlined route (launchpad) that doesn’t feel appropiate for a desktop operating system (not until ipad has OSX)

  • http://ricardocamargo.tumblr.com/ Ricardo Camargo

    Nice try, but I think the right direction could be the IE9 UI with a mixture of the Metro UI thinking touchscreen UI or in such future devices.
    I leave a quote from a famous architect Mies van der Rohe: “Less is more. ”
    (actually owned by British philosopher Richard Wollheim)

  • Marc

    Well, it seems that most peeple hated it, but say what?

  • Marc

    Well, it seems that most peeple hated it, but say what? I like it a lot! Ribbon is great: you have everything easily accessible. Just don’t let the Windows Media Player UI designers ever touch the source of any other product, or else it will become confusing as hell too.

    • Braden

      WIndows Media Player is the worst Microsoft UI design I have seen in recent times. It is very confusing, and has no clear design direction at all

  • Chris

    I miss the Windows XP style explorer. The one that the left pane doesn’t jump when you expand the arrow to look at sub-folders. Where clicking on whitespace deselects a file, actually clicks inside the window, or allows you to highlight without fear of drag-n-drop; instead of highlighting the entire row. Explorer shouldn’t be all singing all dancing and try to generate previews for me while not allowing me to do what I want, manage my files. The preview pane is awesome and so is the search, but I’m lukewarm about this. Explorer isn’t Spreadsheet or Document, it’s a file manager. I don’t think the Ribbon belongs in Explorer, unless it’s half the size of the current one, but wait, isn’t that called a tool bar?

    I actually wish Office 2007+ had a way to revert back to the menus. I like the Ribbon, but sometimes I know where the command is in the old version, but I have no idea where the Ribbon is hiding it.

    Finder was the one reason I couldn’t go to Mac entirely. You say it’s small, it’s fundamental enough in my life using an OS to make me say, NO, and leave.

  • Fri13

    I only got feeling that Microsoft might shoot them selfs to a leg with this idea. The ribbon was already enough for many and paint/wordpad went down with it as well and now they are going to ruin the explorer with it.

    At least they were smart enough to use it on Internet Explorer 9 (who knows IE 10?) as Ribbon UI is not good for most use cases.

    Well, Microsoft wants to have a GUI what supports touch screens as Windows 7 does not do that well, but answer is not Ribbon. Problem is in the WIMP architecture what Microsoft should abandon if wanting to have a good user experience on touch screens.

    Free tip for Microsoft GUI designers: check out how competitors like Apple with iOS, KDE with whole KDE SC and GNOME with GNOME 3.0 (GNOME Shell) has designed their GUI’s for tablets and you might find what is different and why they really work out with touch screens.

    • Rafael

      It’s not clear what form factors the Ribbons will apply to. For example, the UI could morph into the floating tiles (a la Windows Phone) when slate hardware is detected.

  • JustMe

    The ribbon was not innovative. It was and still is a disaster !!! I would completely ignore windows 8 because of it.

    • Braden

      Why “completely ignore windows 8″? Just hide the ribbon. I’m sure they will put enough functionality in a minimsed state to be the same as Windows 7, and all your hotkeys will still work. I think this functionality does help touch interaction, exposes functionality to more basic users (even me…I don’t like having to press alt, to find some of the old explorer commands, and some options now require fewer mouse clicks than before). Chill out haters it wont effect you

  • Dje

    Omagad -.-

  • someone

    To be noted here is of all the Ribbon-based apps, only the Office 2010 ribbon is USER-customizable. Other ribbon UIs are locked down, you can’t put the command you want on the tab you want. That makes a world of difference. Whereas in previous apps like Word 2003, Outlook Express/Windows Mail and Windows XP Explorer, the toolbar was CUSTOMIZABLE.

  • Jordan

    Oh god. If the Ribbon actually hangs around for Windows 8, I’m disappointed to say that I’ll have to switch to Linux.
    Well, that’s if they don’t give us the option to disable the disgusting thing.

    • Anonymous

      Or you can stick with Win7 where everything runs.

  • coyoteNine

    Goodness gracious, seriously? People are complaining about how horrible it looks or simply echoing everyone’s opinion that it’s a bad idea for any user? I’m guessing everybody that commented here probably has enough knowledge with a computer to know the difference between a “browser” and the Internets. The ribbon is more oriented for people who think Google is the internet and who give you a blank stare when you ask them which browser they use. Crude, yes, but for the most part, I believe that is the audience they’re designing this for. And I say that’s great. It may not be the best concept, but I think this could work for people who don’t know how to use a computer like a power user.
    My mother barely knows how to use a computer, she knows how to send email, but attaching an image is beyond her. Doing anything more like navigation through folders on her computer blows her mind. She doesn’t know the concept of a right click for extra options. Having an open menu ribbon like that will help her. Unless it’s showing right there for her, she won’t even know that there’s a function to copy, paste, burn, etc.
    I think that this is a pretty good concept of a design for users who aren’t computer savvy. I think it’s about time that someone’s attempting to design something for the average joe to use. If you’re a power user, just turn the damn ribbon off. At least Microsoft isn’t telling you you’re using it wrong. And if that doesn’t float your boat, then get yourself Linux and call yourself a real power user. And no, this isn’t coming from a Linux or Mac user.

    • John

      *if* you can turn it off.

    • John

      *if* you can turn it off.

  • lee

    I never saw so much clutter on desktop. This must have been designed for P H D’s from the push here dummy generation. It’s ugly, too many choices in your face. Give the person at the keyboard a little credit. We are not as stupid as you think. Is this the answer to can’t find anything I want hidden in Vista or 7 ???

    • Dnj

      have you actually worked with PC users?

  • http://www.dred.vn dred

    like ribbon

  • andy

    Buy a Mac.

  • u600213

    I do not like the ribbon interface. I still use Office 2003 on most of my machines to avoid the ribbon. The one system I have Office 2010 on , I use the UbitMenu add-on to put the menu back in Word and still don’t use the ribbon. If there is not a non-ribbon alternative, I will not use it.

    • Leandro

      MS always keep a way to back to the classic interface. rlx.

    • Leandro

      MS always keep a way to back to the classic interface. rlx.

    • Magius_00

      You do know that the ribbon can be minimized so it is hidden? It will only come up when you select the menus. Even more you can drag and drop customize it.

      Believe me I didn’t like it at first too but after setting it to hide and customizing it I think it is easier than browsing through classic menus.

      Of course my pet peeves will be different from yours, I just found a good compromise for mine.

      • Ribbon Lover

        The hotkey to collapse/expand the ribbon in Office is Ctrl+F1.

    • TheRealMrp

      On Windows XP no doubt

      • http://www.facebook.com/fmcginley Fionn McGinley

        Its all about getting used to it, I didnt like it when I moved from Office 2003 to 2007 but after a few weeks of use it became much more efficient, my other work mates had the same feelings, wouldnt go back now.

  • Giuseppe

    Someting old is something new again
    Look at Lotus 123 for DOS, that’s where the ribbon interface comes from.

    The real innovation would be implementing the Ubuntu/Beryl interface, but since we had to wait ten years to have multiple monitor support (Microstation used to support it since Windows NT 3.51) I would say wait another 5.

  • Jiron

    I see this as a touch-alternative UI for Windows 8. No need for right clicking. It looks a mess right now though. Hope they can make it sleeker.

  • Arnel

    For Microsoft… I suggest before doing the GUI, focus more on WINFS to improve the stability and efficiency of the performance of the Operating System. Speed and stability including security is the main ingredient of a better Operating System. I know Microsoft can do that. Good luck guys.

  • Jaxim

    I agree with Lau. Windows Explorer needs the ability to open multiple instances of windows explorer in tabs – not just in multiple windows.

    I’d also like to easily see two instances of windows explorer open side by side to one another but within one window. This would make it easier to copy/move files from one folder to another folder but still be able to switch back to Windows Explorer after another windows has gained focus.

  • Xenovore

    Damn the ribbon! Especially if it’s going to look anything like that crap shown above.

    But the biggest issue for me there is that I likely won’t be able to customize any of it. I already run into that with the Windows Vista/7 Explorer, where — compared to XP — I’m pretty well forced to use Explorer the way MS wants me to, rather than how I want to. And I certainly do not want more crap taking up my screen space — the whole point of customizeable menus and toolbars is to *hide* the crap you don’t need or use as much.

    As mentioned by somebody else above, although I own Office 2010, I have no desire to use it and I still use Office 2003; everything is the way I like it and as a result, I can get things done there instead of wasting time fighting the POS ribbon.

  • Xenovore

    @ coyoteNine: I hear you there — many computer users are… well, to be blunt, idiots. The issue there however, is that Microsoft has apparently decided — at least based on their track record with Office — that it’s best to foist the simpleton interface onto ALL of us, rather than allowing those of us that ARE computer literate to customize our interfaces to our specific needs.

    So, in a nutshell, if MS allows us to replace the ribbon by creating custom toolbars and/or menus a la XP, then great, give the noobs the ribbon and the rest of us can ignore it and do things our way. Based on past experience with Office 2007+, however, I’m not holding by breath… Microsoft’s attitude has been and most likely will continue to be, “You will ALL get the almighty ribbon and you will damn well like it, because we say so.”

    • Dnj

      sorry, where in office 2003 can you edit the menus?

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Maxwell/100001742474165 Mike Maxwell

        Tools | Customize
        Makes sense, no?

  • Dan

    Why do they have those stupid orange circles next to everything? They take up way too much space and serve no useful purpose. And on top of that, they’re butt-ugly.

    • windows8

      they are place holders…

      Please read more carefully:

      “(Note: Obviously, all of the Ribbon icons shown here are placeholders. These are early days.)”

  • Title Bar

    Still no title…. in the title bar!

  • http://web2mayhem.org vijudallon

    Too many orange circles, and ribbons!

    Windows is good, but this transition is a bit ugly, sorry.

    Redesign the interface, it won’t take long for a monster like Windows!

    Game on!

    • Rafael

      They are placeholders for icons.

  • Schammer

    Ribbon implementation in Office 2010 is unfortunate. Hidden dialogs under little corner arrows are the worst (ex: message “options”). The “clipboard” section contains “format painter” group heading, so the group headings can’t be trusted when trying to find what you’re looking for. So many different control styles are visible at once, again making it hard to scan for something you may not have memorized. I could like the ribbon if it had a visibly consistent entry point (the strength of menus). It needs to keep the complex stuff out of plain sight but make it as intuitive as possible to find it when needed. That means only a few button types, all the same size, though many could expose more interesting “sub-ribbons”.

  • Binary Bob

    Looks just like a Moodle shell to me.

    Creatively bankrupt, that what Microsoft is. With all that is possible, why does this interface look so retro-90s?

    Hey MS, there is no time to follow. You must lead if you ever want to catch up.

  • ANDR

    Одним словом – хуйня-хуйнёй…
    Охуевшие офисные пользователи до сих пор привыкнуть к MSO2007 не смогли, а теперь еще поставить виндовс с риббонами – так вобще пиздец и разорение прийдет!

    • _fuckman_

      Ты абсолютно прав, ANDR. Это еще одно х… после Win7. Непонятно, почему Microsoft решает за пользователей каким интерфейсом им пользоваться! И за их же деньги….

  • http://dukemacgyver.blogspot.com/ DukeMacGyver
  • LinuxBro

    wow windows 8 looks even worse than expected. To much is going on, they should DO LESS! Linux for the Win!

    10.10 Ubuntu
    1.2 Jolicloud

  • Anonymous

    The ribbon toolbar is probably one of the worst UI concepts of the past decade. Utterly miserable to use.

  • Anonymous

    The ribbon toolbar is probably one of the worst UI concepts of the past decade. Utterly miserable to use.

  • Dibyo

    hey guys
    why arent u guys postin more features?
    really waitin n hopin to c more…

  • Dibyo

    hey guys
    why arent u guys postin more features?
    really waitin n hopin to c more…

  • Gagan Rajpal

    Microsoft needs everyone’s prayers if this is real.

  • Gagan Rajpal

    Microsoft needs everyone’s prayers if this is real.

  • Reverb

    I don’t like the ribbon interface too. Sooo many unnecessary things. Microsoft, you don’t have future without simplicity!

  • Reverb

    I don’t like the ribbon interface too. Sooo many unnecessary things. Microsoft, you don’t have future without simplicity!

  • Airtonbr

    I think this approach may be good for the majority of people who use a computer and, as a comment says here, think Google is the internet and can’t tell what browser they use.
    Microsoft will certainly keep a way to turn it off for power users.
    It seems to me a bit cluttered, a bit like the 90s…. it’s as if they came back with the idea of Tasks from Windows XP.
    I prefer today’s clean interface of Explorer. But this ribbon option will be very good for most users, it will help them discover things to do in Explorer they never thought exist.

    Go on MS, just keep a way to turn it off ;-)

  • vince

    To show my age, I started using computers with punch cards and Fortran and I like the ribbon. It’s a thousand times better than the old way. It’s like moving from Win 3.1 to Win95. I work in a large office and the only other people I know that dont like the ribbon are the people that are still getting used to 2003. If you dont like the ribbon, then dont upgrade — dont complain that new things are NOT like the old.

    • Brett Blatchley

      I’m of your period too — ah! keypunches and 3741s! (NOT!)

      At first I *HATED* the ribbon UI because it instantly made me completely useless in Word and Excel. These programs are really just “accessories” supporting me in my software development efforts, yet suddenly it meant that it took me much longer to do what had grown to doing without thinking. I have never absorbed these two tools like I would, say, a computer language or programming environment, but they helped me polish my work, taking it to the next level, as it were. SO, unlike a writer or secretary or accountant who is very serious about these kinds of things, I know enough to be highly dangerous…AND I had little time and NO desire to have to relearn the interface…

      Well, fast forward a few months, and I’ve started to become used to the new UI and it’s kind of growing on me. (Nothing “high” or “noble” here: the tools where what I had and I had to get things done.) I’m still not sure that it’s the sort of UI I would design, but I do want my systems to be useful to people, so I’m going to keep this way of doing things in mind…

      As I age, I’m seeing less and less purpose in being so dogmatic about the benefits or faults of various things, especially computer, political and spiritual things: Life grow on you…

  • Money On thread

    The idea is simple — make it simple, and default it as much as possible, but let the user to choose his/her preferences…. like this app: http://Money-On-Thread.blogspot.com/

    Cheers!
    http://www.CoolMovieBrowser.com

  • Booya

    Actually the ribbon angered me at first. Now, however that Iam used to it, I can’t imagine it any other way. I am anxious to try it. I only pray the Windows gives me multiple desktops and easy switchig between them. Its long overdue in Windows.

  • Booya

    Actually the ribbon angered me at first. Now, however that Iam used to it, I can’t imagine it any other way. I am anxious to try it. I only pray the Windows gives me multiple desktops and easy switchig between them. Its long overdue in Windows.

  • Speebek

    A ribbon in Windows Explorer, well, they’ve already made it harder to use in Vista and Win 7, so why not go all the way and make it visually confusing as well?

    The ribbon is one of MS’s worst ideas (adding tabs to IE was another – or what’s a taskbar for?). The toolbar was more useful as a visual tool and the customizations made more sense. The ribbon is a visual nightmare and takes up way too much space. I only use it at work and use Office 2003 at home. Even at work, I minimize the ribbon and use the Quick Access toolbar.

    Small icons on the menu bars makes much more sense. Never, change your end user’s expectations unless the results are vastly superior. The only ones claiming that for the ribbons are people

    Unfortunately, we’ll all have to upgrade to Microsoft’s demented attempt to throw away market share or move to Open Office. The latter seems more and more practical every day (and free, of course). A shame there’s not a viable commercial OS that will run Windows apps as easily (no, Linux emulation does not count).

    • Lan787

      how about bootcamp on MacOS?

  • A Guy Called Steve

    This is horrible. I’ll stick with windows 7.

  • http://twitter.com/WQFF WillQuest ForFood

    What a great way to convince the company President here to switch to Ubuntu! All I have to do is install Windows 8 with the Toiletpaper, I mean, Ribbon interface on his computer and he’ll be an enthusiastic advocate for change.

    • Graham_T

      There’s a set of new interfaces to things like Live Mesh, SkyDrive, Lync, Sharpeoint and other Cloud services coming in Windows 8.

      So when you do get Windows 8 for the CEO (and his immediate reports) sitting on their shiny-new Windows Tablets, then they will be plugged into the companies services like never before, with loads of new capabilities, so they will need a touch-friendly interface – which the Ribbon is.

  • http://twitter.com/WQFF WillQuest ForFood

    What a great way to convince the company President here to switch to Ubuntu! All I have to do is install Windows 8 with the Toiletpaper, I mean, Ribbon interface on his computer and he’ll be an enthusiastic advocate for change.

  • Mhmbc

    Peronally I’l not a fan of the ribbon. Don’t like it, find it insanely irritating and – like you guts – don’t like loosing the screen real-estate at the top of the screen. Can we have the normal menu bar back please MS?

    • James Brice

      Right click – Minimize the Ribbon- you got your real estate back.

  • http://www.facebook.com/Lonepanther Spruce Panther

    Ribbon interface is fine stop whining just because it’s functional!

    • Mannieokelly

      The ribbon is awful. None of my customers like it. Some converted back to Office 2003. At Microsoft, “Pretty” takes precedence over “Useful”. It’s like the old MGM motto: “Ars Gratia Artis” (Art for the sake of Art). I’m reminded of the language “wars” and one classic quip: “Nobody knows what the new language will look like, but it’ll be called Fortran.”

      Microsoft shows a callous disregard for customer’s training costs and lost productivity. Always has.

      • Anonymous

        I wouldn’t call the ribbon interface “pretty.” I however find it a lot more useful than pecking through tons of drop down menus.

        The only “training costs” here are people that are resistant to change and don’t want to stop doing things the way they used to. Spend about 30 minutes exploring the ribbon menus and you’ll know where things are and how it just makes sense to group things together like they did.

    • Anonymous

      Ribbon bar is excellent… but not in areas where their are few feature, and not on folders. Programs yes.. not folders.
      We are in 2011, if since 1995 (being nice here) you didn’t discover that your mouse has a second button… then you got problems.

      I could see the ribbon useful, to easily navigate in menus with your fingers or pen. So that is perfectly fine. But with a mouse.. it’s useless. I dont’ know about you, but as an advance user, I NEVER use the menu to do things in folder. I drag and drop, and perform copy/paste/cut action with my keyboard, same for delete and all that. So the ribbon bar takes screen real estate for nothing. Granted you hide it, but it’s still 32pixel height of so, that you lose per folder. In other words you’ll want to put your screen in portrait mode, not landscape.. Granted it will boost 16:10 screen, which is a must as I strongly believe 16:9 aspect ratio has no business on computers. But that is just me.

      If there is an option to disable it, or is disabled by default, then excellent.
      Tablets can have it, like the check box selection in Win7, normal laptop and desktops can have the normal way.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Maxwell/100001742474165 Mike Maxwell

      The old menu system was functional. What’s next? A moving sign of icons that you can choose from as it float by? Flashing icons, like neon signs? I’m sure billboards are functional, that doesn’t mean I like them.

  • Yavorh

    For anyone who does not like the ribbon, it’s most likely cause you never gave it time, or understand it correctly, watch:

    Please don’t reply unless you watch it all.

    • Dnj

      course we like the ribbon, its simply unhidden menus – 5 mins after trying office 2007 I was doing all sorts of new things I hadnt done before.

    • kmitchell3

      It’s still just plain old ugly…

      There is nothing new in this video that isn’t employed by other program designers and developers in bringing an application to the market.

      They just need to employ good designers to make their products look good, but I think it’s just that the Windows internal architecture must prevent the development of good design.

  • http://twitter.com/harkirat Harkirat Singh

    I think that the ribbon is also a very touch friendly interface. This should be carried forward and they should look at incorporating ribbon in a mobile form factor…

  • Xio78

    As long as the stick the up button back into explorer I’ll be happy.

  • hiren

    I think the ribbon interface has a lot of advantages over the disadvantages. i could only see one downfall with it, it’s the waste of space. Other than that, it’s very intuitive rather than some drop-down menus where everything is hard to find and hidden.

  • AlienWolf

    I’m glad I moved all my systems to various Linux distros after testing out the Vista beta many years ago. The KDE desktop lets me choose exactly how I want my interface, I don’t like that being decided for me.

  • http://profiles.google.com/daboss302 S D

    blahhh vomit, thank god i got a mac air for my birthday ahhh so nice…
    hahahahaha windows fail.. you dont learn anything from steve jobs do you.. having something look good and do the job works. windows 7 is fine how about adding a gaming feature morons…. shuts off all apps while your game so you get better performance or an app store …. hahaha windows live
    and now that mac is getting some good games i will probably end up buying a mac desktop hahahaahha hackintosh.
    TABWORKS!!! lol win 3.1 awsome

  • Now an OpenOffice.org user

    What is it with MS these days?

    The Office 2010 Ribbon is *hideous* – look at the File ‘menu’.
    When I Print, what am I interested in? My document
    When I Save, what am I interested in? My document!
    When I Close, what am I interested in MY DOCUMENT!

    So why in the four shades of hell does Microsoft think it’s a good idea to hide my document from me when I do these things?

    I do not want to look at Microsoft’s pretty menu – I care about the work I’m doing, and *only* the work I’m doing. Why are you forcibly hiding my work from me when I want to save it?

    So I will never purchase MS Office ever again, and after the amount of retraining my employer had to do to switch everyone from Office 2003 to Office 2010 I doubt they’ll bother either.

    • Anonymous

      I’m baffled here.

      Print is the only one of those options where I could see you absolutely -needing- to view the document and the print option DOES display a preview of how your document will print. It is completely unnecessary to see the document when saving (not to mention shortcuts like ctrl+s, the save button right above the file menu, and the fact that when you select the save option it returns to the document renders your point on this moot). And who honestly uses the file menu to close a window and needs to see their document when closing?

      Seriously, I acclimated to Office 2010 in about a day. How can it be that hard to train somehow how to use?

      • Eliot

        I second this, how people can prefer dull, complex menus is beyond me. People will always find something to moan about, bunch of neophobes

    • Shmo6666

      You are absolutely correct !

  • Matt

    The ribbon is great once you get used to it, it’s well known that nobody likes change initially.

    How long before the linux guys start to introduce this I wonder :D

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Maxwell/100001742474165 Mike Maxwell

      It’s been how many years so far?

  • Mike

    Microsoft does still innovate, and this is one of their biggest UI hits in recent times, in my opinion. What most people don’t seem to get is that Microsoft doesn’t make such a large UI change without good reason. They spend time and money on usability studies to determine if the change makes a user more productive, and makes the product easier to use. This means watching people use the product, timing how long it takes them to do things, etc. In the case of the ribbon, I can guarantee you that it does improve the product for the majority of users, and that is not an opinion. Like other people have mentioned, if you really can’t try something new for a change, then turn it off.

    • Fzz

      No way to turn it off, only hide it.

      And since MSFT has NEVER shared its usability data, there’s no way to know whether there’s any data to support the ribbon’s superiority as a UI. Far more likely is the fact that the ribbon is restricted IP which competitors have to copy from scratch while avoiding any patented bits. The ribbon promotes MSFT product lock-in more than anything else. Thus it’s raison d’etre.

      • Anonymous

        Programs can use the ribbon bar. There is a nice start-up template in Visual Studio 2010 to get a developer started, and the full documentation on MSDN. You can use Office 2007 and 2010 ribbon bars look.

      • Graham_T

        To add Ribbon interface to your own application, then here’s some documentation http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd371193(VS.85).aspx

        Also the use in Windows 7 Touch capable interfaces is explained in a lot more detail here http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-u... as well as a number of subtle changes Windows 7 makes to the UI when it knows a touch-enabled interface is being used

        ——————————————-

        And if not using Windows, then how about Linux?
        Mono project and Open Office are following this trend and is going to offer a Ribbon interface too.

        See:-
        http://digg.com/linux_unix/Mono_developer_brings_the_Ribbon_interface_as_in_Office_2007_to_Linux

        http://www.geek.com/articles/news/openoffice-experiments-with-a-ribbon-interface-20090812/

      • Graham_T

        Research that led to the Ribbon interface is documented here:-

        The Story of the Ribbon
        http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jensenh/archive/2008/03/12/the-story-of-the-ribbon.aspx

      • Brian

        Sorry, but you’re completely wrong. I worked at MSFT for 3.5 years and was personally involved in sharing usabiility data with numerous customers. We even helped customers setup their own usability labs based on best practices we uncovered. It was a very elaborate process at Microsoft that took a great many things into account. The Fluent UI made people more productive. As for restrictions on the UI – again, you are completely wrong. Ever hear of RibbonX? You can completely customize the ribbon using .NET, including choosing which “ribbons” you want displayed based on user roles, etc. I’m not sure where you’re drawing your conclusions from, but they certainly aren’t based in any reality.

  • http://wii4everybody.com/ Oziel LG

    Its cool to see these kind of posts on your site again xD you rock Rafael!

  • BObama

    Ah the Ribbon.. The Alzeheimers interface where every interaction is like a new experiece. Balmer wonb’t be happy until he has killed productivity nd M$..

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000225742582 Billie-jo Ann Della Selva

    The orange circles are placeholders, not the actual icons, people. No one likes to read.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Maxwell/100001742474165 Mike Maxwell

      Speak for yourself. I (along with most other literate people in the West) much prefer to read words instead of icons. That’s why alphabets replaced hieroglyphics.

  • Dementorspirit

    awesome

  • Antonio

    зачем все так усложнять???

  • http://profiles.google.com/mattcohen927 Matt Cohen

    “You can have it any color you want, as long as it’s blue”

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Maxwell/100001742474165 Mike Maxwell

    The ribbon is useful in Office? For what? Having multi-letter alt keystrokes to get to commands I need? Having icons in place of words? (Hieroglyphics went away when alphabetic writing systems were invented.) Having an easy way to get to the mail merge functions in Word? When was the last time I needed mail merge? Making it easy to make the commands I need available, and get rid of the ones that I never use?

    And successful? Only in the sense that Microsoft forced me to use it on my PC at work (since my company chose to downgrade from MsOffice 2003 to 2007). At home it was so successful, I got rid of MsOffice and got Open Office.

  • BumbleBritches57

    the breac=dcrumb and back/forward buttons will be moved to the transparent, windows bar, and the ribbon will be moved down accordingly

  • Guesty

    The few times I have used the ribbon, I didn’t like it, so I have stuck with Office 2003. Under the ribbon paradigm, it has not yet guessed where one’s custom menus show up, like those I programmatically create in any of my Excel .xla add-ons.

    For that matter, I usually swap the “new…” menu item in the file menu for a “new blank document” command, add a “revert…” item to the file menu, backed by VBA, a “paste unformatted text” to the edit menu, again backed by VBA, etc. Can one customize the ribbon to the same extent? Do I have to create icons for each so they appear native?

    I really despise the idea of the ribbon in Windows Explorer, much like I hate the tasks pane, the IE command bar, the auto-hidden tray icons, taskbar glomming, and every Start Menu implementation other than the “classic” style last available in Vista. Windows 6.x has already successfully buried any useful control under a mountain of dialogs, taking me far longer to accomplish the same tasks compared to XP. (I do, and always have, kept my (classic) Start Menu extremely organized, stop all superfluous tray apps from automatically starting, etc.)

    A quick disclaimer: I am a long time Mac user at home, from a Centris 660AV to my current Mac Pro.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_MTEO7RKG3IO7LOJZ3GJJ5NSOOI john s

    Lol man Microsoft has lost it.

  • Anonymous

    I really don’t get all the comments that the ribbon system is somehow “so much better” for the novice user. It took me until the late 1990s to get my mom to stop using her word processor and start using a computer, and she learned how to use Word and (shudder) Works. She’s, by no means, a power user, but she learned how to use the menu system just fine.

    Last year, she got a new piece of crap computer that didn’t come with Office or Works. So I gave her one of my licenses of Office 2007 Home and Student edition. She loathes the ribbon design. She outright cannot use it. I tried teaching her how to use it and it was like trying to teach someone from Ethopia who doesn’t understand English what a Rubic’s Cube is. Ultimately, she demanded I uninstall it and get her something like her old version of Word. She’s now using OpenOffice and is quite content.

    I was forced to take a night training course when my employer migrated from Office 2003 to Office 2007. It was VERY telling to me when I realized the front half of every chapter was, essentially, a tutorial on how to freakin’ use the ribbon for a given program or given function within a program. Once you got past that and actually started doing Office work, it kept having to drill in the new ribbon concept. After the course, the most common question I got from users at work were “Can we go back to Office 2003?” The Ribbon was the most common complaint when having to support software issues.

    The Ribbon UI is a giant flustercuck of information at the top of every window for novice users. It’s too bulky and cumbersome for power users. So the Ribbon is good for whom, again?

  • Iexbeta

    How to enable the function?, I have the build but do not see the function

  • Please Nospam

    Haha, you can’t be serious! I literally laughed out loud when I saw this. Stupidest idea in a long time. Why can’t MS get their act together with design and use that WP7 look for everything. Thankfully Aero is practically dead and buried now :) While I’m at it: What happened to Windows 8 being a managed code OS? That would have actually NOT SUCKED (to those who’ve been living under a rock: not sucking is actually a Good Thing ™ for MS. So is innovating instead of patent trolling). But, I digress:

    Fanboys eat your hearts out!

  • font9a

    Good god that’s a lot of buttons…..

  • http://profiles.google.com/doctordns Thomas Lee

    I hated the ribbon in Office and I’ll hate it even more in Windows.

    :0(

  • Armand

    If this is the way that Microsoft is going, I’m going to do all I can to pursuade my place of employment to not follow them blindly. From what I can see, it looks rediculous.

  • Anonymous

    office 2010 is nice and so is the ribbon, when needed.. MS is good these days.. people just like to bash them. but didn’t microsoft bashing go out of style in 2003 or so?

  • http://profiles.google.com/patrick.kanne patrick kanne

    Just read through the comments and, as with everything MS, there’s a lot of haters out there.. Funny how I distinctly remember hearing the same kind of arguments from people who went from wp 5.1 to word for windows. “omg tharr be buttons, now I cannot do anything anymore”.
    True, it’s annoying when you have spend SO much time learning by heart a crappy old system and are confronted with something new which still has to prove it’s usefullness (to you). Going form expert to newbe is a hideous process, but not the fault of the program… But that’s the way things go. Would love to see some of you make the jump to Mac, where everything is even more dumbed down.

    I also see people mention OpenOffice and Ubuntu.. Lovely, and they think they have issues now… Just for the record: open office is just a copy of MS office, but then free, stealing MS UI concepts from its very beginning. Everything MS office does will soon be picked up by these copycats, mark my words.

    • Master Rod

       On the contrary, MS is copying Firefox, Linux, etc., and trying to incorporate, and justify their OS by stealing from Open Sources. You all just MS Slaves. That’s all. Linux will be around for a very long time.

  • Recklessmaverick

    They can anything they want to with Windows 8 as long as they fix two of my worst annoyances…teach Win 8 how to remember a window was restored UP as well as when its restored DOWN and in Explorer when I click to open a folder that folder moves to the bottom of the screen which means I have to scroll to see the contents. Make it move up towards the TOP instead.

  • Ludomatico
  • Ludomatico

    There is something weird about the reason of think of a ribbon for Windows Explorer, it’s very clear and contradictory at the same time:

    Just think about it:

    Internet Explorer 9 UI its 100% minimal. It only have 3 small icons at the right… so… Why IE9 team developed a sleek and minimal UI?
    I guess they follow the directions of Chrome’s good taste (user interface design)

    Now, Windows 8 Explorer comes with a… ribbon! The opposite of something minimal and sleek!
    A ribbon full of big icons and options that we don’t need…

    It’s ironic, isn’t?

    People are used to make a right-click or use a keyboard shortcut to make common things like copy and paste, create a new folder… and I’m saying people are used since 10 years ago doing this!!!

    For what reason we’ll need a ribbon now? For copy and paste??
    Is it worth take more than 100 pixels of the screen to put this ribbon??

    The answer is no.

    I develop myself a “fast mockup” of a minimal ribbon… please take a look here:

    http://ludomatico.deviantart.com/#/d3dfxva

    This mockup shows a kind of ribbon, but just smaller an clearer that the leaked screenshots… There’s no need to make a huge 100px in height ribbon for explorer!

    I’m too kind of disapointed with the size of the icons in taskbar! They are so big and spaced!
    Take a look at this concept:
    http://ludomatico.deviantart.com/#/d3c4fkx

    the icons are 24px x 24px sized, and close each other than the current W7 taskbar.
    Why using 32 x 32 icons!

    this concept pretends to allow more programs pinned in taskbar! I have many programs!

    I’m a pro user, not a grandmom that uses only IE and Mail and nothing more…

    So, that’s my ideas to have a better version of Windows!

    • Neal Madlani

      love it

  • http://www.facebook.com/BaRRaKID Sergio Duarte

    How about adding tabs to windows explorer and office?

  • http://www.facebook.com/BaRRaKID Sergio Duarte

    I just which that they would finally add tabs to office and explorer… :x

  • TryllZ

    Interface still lfeels like I’m seeing a new Windows 7..

    BTW, the ribbon looks UGLY here but not in Office…

    • TryllZ

      I’d still prefer Longhorn interface over this, sorry, nonsense…but every one these days like uncluttered UI but still with accessible buttons and menus…don’t know what M$ was thinking….seriuosly needs a new makeover, PLEASE….

  • Xxx-sms

    mirdobra.com.ua

  • Hansket600

    I didn’t like the ribbon at first too, but why fight it? go with the flow and one’ll see its better.

    change is good!

  • Penguin386

    What a stupid idea. The Office 2007 Ribbon sucks!

    • Phillip Roy Wager

      I agree. It is all together too cluttered. And I think that Tabbed browsing would be far more useful.

  • http://twitter.com/BiteMeForCookie José Santos

    disgusting… Portugal rullz… Peace Out bitches.

  • http://www.3686.co.uk/People/Blogs/Blog.aspx?BlogId=4 Alex Williamson

    That’s crap. All we truly needed was the New Folder button and we were happy.

  • http://www.ideasbubble.com Peter Joseph

    Grow up all you idiots and start recognizing that you could never even build yourself something better, so F off!
    The design is looking awesome, loving it! :)

    • Mark

      I COULD EASILY AND SIMPLY AND IN FAR LESS TIME DESIGN A UI THAT IS A BILLION TIMES BETTER THAN ANYTHING THE MORONIC SMELLY GREASY SPOTTY VIRGIN NERDS AT MICROSOFT COME UP WITH…BUT THEN I AM NOT A FUCKING SYNCHOPANTIC MORON LIKE YOU

      • http://www.ideasbubble.com Peter Joseph

        If your so fucking good then why haven’t they employed you dickhead?

      • Shit4brians

        PJ.. ur a complete putz.. end story :)

      • http://www.ideasbubble.com Peter Joseph

        Compared to what? You?

      • Master Rod

         Dear Microsoft Slave PJ

        Simply go to openSUSE and build your own distro. It is free. Oh, oh, Your MOM just said for you to go wash your mouth out with soap.

        Master Rod

  • Elliott Robbins

    It’s bad decisions like this that cause people to not upgrade. This better be optional and not forced (or at least a way to toggle it off).

  • Macutmore

    Why are the icons so big? Obviously because it’s to be a touch screen interface, naturally to work in tablet form in a more friendly way than Windows 7, this is how things have gone. Its one big evolution issue that’s all.

    Tinkering has it’s users, and they just might hit onto something without even realising it. In the meantime, keep tweaking that blank canvas!

  • emfoster1019

    Honestly, I think it’s amazing how many people can find things wrong with something Microsoft does. As a developer and end-user, I’ve grown to love the concept of the ribbon. Of course, like everything else, it takes time to get used to. Every big change takes time to get used to. The ribbon allows users to access everything quickly from one place. No menus you have to navigate. Yeah, people have been using the standard interactive menus for a while, but even those took time to get used to. Give it a chance, explore it, learn how to use it, and find ways to make it better. As a developer, I can safely say that the ribbon concept is a work in progress. We probably won’t see the finished and most efficient version of the ribbon until at least 2015. Just be patient and continue with the feedback and the ribbon will continue to evolve until it’s as efficient as it should be.

    • Master Rod

       You are a Microsoft Slave sir! You work for Microsoft. That is like calling the kettle black. Besides, next year, it won’t be ribbons anyway. They will eventually scrap their OS in favor of a Linux blend. Just think of all the programmers out of work since the OS is F-R-E-E. They would then just simply drop a dime in t he opensource bucket and have them build it for Microsoft. There, I just a million dollars in consulting fees and save Microsoft billions.

      Master Rod

  • Mark

    Dear God NO NO NO

    Unless we can completely customise the ribbon and get what we want where we want then ABSOLUTELY NOT!

    The RIBBON is an ABOMINATION…the only thing the ribbon does it make it harder and increase the number of clicks needed to do what you want to do…whomever came up with this idea clearly has ZERO idea about UI and what a TYPICAL end user wants (as opposed to the synchopantic smelly greasy spotty virgin nerds want).

    • nerdy

      Actually as one of those greasy virgin nerds, I find ribbons to be a painful way to navigate. I would much rather have an organized standard menu system with well thought out keyboard shortcuts.

      • SgtPepper

        Nerdy said… “I would much rather have an organized standard menu system with well thought out keyboard shortcuts”

        Get a Mac.

      • Master Rod

         Alright you 2 Microsoft Slaves. Get Linux! When Microsoft starts changing underwear more often than every 3-4 years,  and then have to pay on top of it, time to change. openSUSE is the best kept secret.

        Master Rod

      • Bg

        The ribbon works perfectly with keyboard only shortcuts.  Just press “alt” and see for yourself

  • http://twitter.com/andrewrocks4evr andrew

    this is bullcrap. microsoft is taking 2 steps back when xp had this kinda comand tools on top. since vista, they removed it and i hardly accepted that change but after a couple of weeks of using it, i realized i didnt need those comands anymore. they were just a waste of space that i could use to se my files… is happening again. its too thick, too heavy, not user freindly and not intuitive: looks HORRIBLE!!!!!

  • Anonymous

    Or…you could all cool down and wait for an actual beta version or a RC to see how it will look in the end. It is clear that this is not the final UI version, so why are you getting yourselves so worked up over something you know is not a final product?

  • Dj-control-246

    In Office … good :)
    In the Explorer….. I don’t be sure :S

  • Annymous

    I can see it working pretty well if you think of it in terms of making features more accessable on a media display / touch interface system.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2S67V4YHMNWV6IWV7RYYXTQSSA CFBMoo1

    Well I can see my mother is going to be blown away again when I have to switch her from Windows 7 to Windows 8. It was a pain for her to find things when switching from XP to Windows 7. I can see Windows 8 may be just as fun.

    Why can’t people leave things along that already work?

    • Anomynous

      jup, I hear what you are saying: Never change a winning team
      but, M$ likes money. So they make sure newer programes are incompatible with older OS.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ray-Rayz/100001888126772 Ray Rayz

    Perhaps the ribbon will be OK if it can beont the side. The way it is all going there will be only room for one line of text on a wide screen..

  • Bob

    If this is for desktops as well as tablets, then they’ve finally lost the plot they’ve been losing since Vista/Office 2007. If it is so, then this is same mistake that befell Ubuntu 11.04 : not everything is an iPhone ferchrissakes. Bring back real MENUS with you know, WORDS on them – the tools of adult thought!

    • http://www.ideasbubble.com Peter Joseph

       I remember Microsoft saying that it was going to focus on touch screen technology, so wouldn’t the larger menu’s help?

    • Anonymous

       well the file manager in ubuntu saves a ton of vertical space, compared to this and last time i checked they had words…

      and design is still ongoing so other changes/improvements should occur.

  • veldar

     Don’t like the ribbon in explorer i won’t buy win 8 if this is the default explorer 

    • Anonymous

      same here, seems they like wasting vertical space, compared to what i see in mac and ubuntu.

  • Frankwells3721

    RIBBON INTERFACE SUCKS! IT WAS DESIGNED FOR 3 YEAR OLDS!!!  It is only there to force older programs and XP to become obsolete for new sales, otherwise they would have given you an option to run either ribbon or a drop down version with all functions activated. A recent poll of XP users have an 80% negative view of the ribbon menu system, so MS decisions are not user based.  

  • Spampam2005

    Wow, that is ugly.

  • Aquahealer

    I’m sorry but I’m a programmer and I do NOT understand “ribbons”. They make no logical sense to me, and I can’t see how they make sense to anyone other than the person that designed them. Menu’s have been around for eons. When I go to a restaurant I don’t want to guess at what is what and what category it might fall under. I want to see all Appetizers in a list, all Soups in a list, all Entree’s in a list etc etc. I don’t want to see pictures of foods, and have to ask the server “Is this an entree or an appetizer?” I don’t want to ask “What is this a picture of?” I want it to say what it is, and it’s ingredients. I want my menu’s and I want them alphabetical. If everything in life were only that simple. Ahh but who likes simple anymore?

    • anymous666

      well it’s the new idea from microsoft that groups toolbar into one or more tab,,,

  • Renato Lanzieri

    I’m anxious! Come on 2012!!!

  • Jase

    I think that windows 8 looks millions times easier and smarter but they should sort out this one major thing that they have missed out in windows. That is a built in registry cleaner and defragmenter alongside the currunt tools such as disk defragmenter.

    I am appalled that Microsoft has made the disk defrag the only defragmenter. A lot of people do not have enough computer knowledge to know about these missing features, which is the main reason that a lot of people have so slow computers. And they then are keep thinking that it is other stuff that is causing it, so they do the wrong things such as uninstalling updates which are actually beneficial ones.

    • Legendary beast of Aaaargh

      Are you kidding me? Have you actually run tests on the difference between reg defragged and non defragged? Put in an SSD, up your mem, choose the right virusscanner. Reg defrag, my a$$

  • Danny@hk

    Ribbon is good for instant preview when that is used in Office. Waste of screen area when employed in file explorer.

  • Anonymous

    Microsoft’s  ribbon has robbed our firm of productivity. People waste time searching for functions they already know how to use. The arrangement of various size icons scattered across the screen is a disorganized arbitrary substitute for the simple logical pull down menus it replaced.

    Microsoft needs to fire the twits who devised this scheme and pushed it onto the public. I won’t be rewarding them with the purchase any new MS Office software  until the ribbon is replaced with the highly productive convenient menus. I’ll stick with MS Office 2003.

    • Eric

      You are simply WRONG!

  • Jorge

    They have this for touch screens. If you dont like it just deactivate it

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Tim-Smith/100002116432891 Tim Smith

    the ribbon SUCKS

    • Eric

      You sucks… You are a dinosaur my friend… You probably are one that like Android crap phone lol…

      • Brian

        Well Eric about says it all – how about saying why you like the ribbon?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Tim-Smith/100002116432891 Tim Smith

    do people really like the ribbon? and if so WHO are they?  after using this for several years i still hate it!

    • Eric

      It is because you are from another age … All peoples that have less then 50 years of age see that Ribbons are a major step forward…

      • Brian

        Yet to find anyone who likes it  – tolerate it yes, but thats aboout it.

        Guess if you have known nothing better :)

      • alex

        I am 21 and I think the ribbon is the dumbest thing I have seen from M$ in a while.

      • Tonv

        Only when you are above 50 years I could believe you.
        When you are below 50 you still have to learn a lot.

  • Jay

    Whoever told Microsoft that the new ribbon design was a good idea WAS WRONG.  Are you (MS) kidding me?  What were you thinking?  MS Office (and especially Excel) is a business tool used by professional business people who shouldn’t have to compromise ease of use features when PAYING for an upgrade!  2003 worked fine WHY SCREW IT UP?  

    • Eric

      What are you taking about… The ribbons has invented expressly for this kind of users…

  • Guest

    It’s interesting that many of the same people who praise iOS’s simplicity, ridicule the ribbon. Guess what, it wasn’t designed for power users.

  • ender

    I just hope they’ll fix ribbon’s colours in Windows 8 – right now the ribbon only follows the system’s colour scheme if you have high-contrast mode enabled, which IMHO is atrocious.

  • Brian

    What can you
    say – the ribbon is probably one of the worst UI interfaces ever made!

    Currently
    use Win7 on a touch screen, and the menus are not ideal, the only thing worse is the ribbon, its difficult to touch and it takes up way too much screen real estate.

    Yes Microsft you invented it – so perhaps Apple can’t copy it – but there again I doubt if they would want to……..

    Perhaps
    Microsoft are trying to do an “HP” – the dinosaurs are dead long live the mammals!

  • Bilal Majeed

    well i’m 28, and I only started using office a lot after I got out of college in 2006, at first Ifound the ribbon ui a bit confusing, but soon i devised a strategy of how to be more productive using it – in one sentence I told myself ” everything in this new interface is where it should be” and once I started following that principle I just loved it.
    the ribbon UI is a lot more intuitive I feel and couldn’t welcome it’s integration into the explorer shell quickly enough.

  • Bilal Majeed

    well i’m 28, and I only started using office a lot after I got out of college in 2006, at first Ifound the ribbon ui a bit confusing, but soon i devised a strategy of how to be more productive using it – in one sentence I told myself ” everything in this new interface is where it should be” and once I started following that principle I just loved it.
    the ribbon UI is a lot more intuitive I feel and couldn’t welcome it’s integration into the explorer shell quickly enough.

  • Phil

    Ahhhhhh where to start, ribbon, no ribbon i’m sure it’s an argument for a board room but lets get to the real facts about user interface and explorer. For the masses who use computers and mobile devices i.e. the general public, these days they would be happier if there were no access to files and folders period either with or without a ribbon.

    I’ve supported users for almost 15 years and especially in the last 5 years its become apparent if its not on the desktop for the majority of users they have no interest in looking in a folder menu or file system to find it.

    Why has apple taken over the UI world “simplicity” its all there, access to the applications they use in one place, no menus no ribbons just a plain old button on a plain old desktop.

    Yes the approach is designed for idiots and it looses the ability to add items without real estate but it’s all there in one space.

    The only people who care about explorer files and folders are techies and people who have grown up with windows from 3.1 (yes I remember pre workgroup versions, pre internet and pre Gb disks)

    There is a need to create a new enviroment, one designed for the masses, there’s already the scoring system for hardware which effects the UI so expand it, choose the experience you want, why not score that too? you want access to explorer and the files and folders because you need to ammend a system file select UI experience choose experience level 4 and you have access explorer to files and folders. You’ve finished select UI 1 and your back to a desktop only interface.

    I’m sure i’m going to get shot down by people likely to read this but come on Microsoft start thinking for mass market and stop bending to techies whims, folders, files, explorer, ribbon or no ribbon your missing the point, people want simplicity and only dev and support people may need access via explorer either with or without a ribbon.

  • Zam

    where’s the “Map Network Drive” button….?

  • Euripede Sicchierolli

    Instead of using the ‘APPSTORE’ why don’t you use Apps Bazaar or yet Apps Mall?
    Just an idea…

  • Tonv

    After installing W8 Developer Preview on a desktop PC, I noticed 3 things:
    1. The Metro UI is not a suitable interface for desktop PCs.
    2. The advanced appearance settings are gone (Personalize – Window Color – Adv..).
    3. When Classic Menu is on there is no ribbon. 

  • Win 8 Bytes

    Microsoft needs to take that ribbon control, and Windows 8 along with it, and stuff them both so far back (yes, back) up their ass that they never find them again. What complete, utter, crap they both are! Will anything useful every come out of Redmond again? Win7 is the best thing they’ve produced in the last 20 years!

  • Lol

    Guys, Ribbon is not touch friendly, actually it is totally unusable without a mouse and/or keyboard regardless of how smart and good looking it is. Windows 8 is supposed to and will be touch oriented, so I bet they will drop ribbon sooner rather than later.

  • Eskovanhattem

    The ribbon SUCKS,  time to Apple?

  • Nice_hapoo

    Nooooooooooo, I domt like it. Its not user friendly.Not good for Pc users. I thinmk its time to switch to Apple!!!!

  • Nice_hapoo

    Usually those who do the thinking and dsigning should be sobber and clean. This proves that they are neither sobber or clean. Please dont get high while you are designing such programs and operating systems

  • Nice_hapoo

    simplicity and practicality is what users want. Where are you Bill Gates?? There are realy fucked up engeneers in Microsoft

  • http://twitter.com/__528491 JA

    I’m having a better question for ui designers at Microsoft. Please do answer me this:

    Why isn’t there a god damn drop-down submenu option in windows 7 address bar? 

    You have already destroyed the perfect functionality of one-click-expanding folder tree in the left pane (present in windows xp) by now making users have to double-click on folders in the left pane, or aim the retarded microscopic triangles near the folder icons in order to expand them – thanks a lot for mutilating the left folder pane and making it completely useless.

    At least the address bar had the potential to replace the functionality of the xp left pane, but nooo – each folder in the address bar menu, in order to be accessed, has to be clicked on, so it could close itself (!) and reveal the folders it contains. Brilliant thinking.

  • Digitalage

    Enough with those ribbons already. I’m a techie and I’m not pleased with this. Ribbon might be a useful feature for office apps. But please, It is not very suitable for routines UI especially in Windows Explorer. And do you remember WINDOWS MEDIA CENTER? The METRO APPS also will suffer the same fate. Believe me. No one will use that.