<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sapphire&#8217;s RedLine breaks on 64-bit due to compile error</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/</link>
	<description>Not your usual Microsoft enthusiast blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: net</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6745</link>
		<dc:creator>net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6745</guid>
		<description>I have a xfx 5970 black edition and i&#039;m getting the same stupid bug! If I want to use the overvolt I have to uninstall the card drivers, clean the system (driver cleaner), remove the displays via devide manager, reboot, reinstall drivers, reboot and then run the overvolt. - If I reboot or shutdown my pc the overvolt bugs again... so I can only run the overvolt 1 time per driver installation! pretty annoying!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a xfx 5970 black edition and i&#8217;m getting the same stupid bug! If I want to use the overvolt I have to uninstall the card drivers, clean the system (driver cleaner), remove the displays via devide manager, reboot, reinstall drivers, reboot and then run the overvolt. &#8211; If I reboot or shutdown my pc the overvolt bugs again&#8230; so I can only run the overvolt 1 time per driver installation! pretty annoying!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6270</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6270</guid>
		<description>The link to the Adobe PDF 64-bit fix in the comments above is broken now since the site in question direct-linked to a file they shouldn&#039;t have.

The fix is here for anyone who wants it (and now includes a fix for thumbnails in addition to the preview handler fix, and also an installer/automated fix-it tool):

http://www.pretentiousname.com/adobe_pdf_x64_fix/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The link to the Adobe PDF 64-bit fix in the comments above is broken now since the site in question direct-linked to a file they shouldn&#8217;t have.</p>
<p>The fix is here for anyone who wants it (and now includes a fix for thumbnails in addition to the preview handler fix, and also an installer/automated fix-it tool):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pretentiousname.com/adobe_pdf_x64_fix/" rel="nofollow">http://www.pretentiousname.com/adobe_pdf_x64_fix/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marvin</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6234</link>
		<dc:creator>Marvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6234</guid>
		<description>@Rafael
is it possible to port the &quot;remote access website&quot; to the old version of Windows Home Server? Would be greate to have mms there too. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rafael<br />
is it possible to port the &#8220;remote access website&#8221; to the old version of Windows Home Server? Would be greate to have mms there too. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlikDesk</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6216</link>
		<dc:creator>AlikDesk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 07:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6216</guid>
		<description>I tried and on behalf of the Administrator, the same error output</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried and on behalf of the Administrator, the same error output</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafael</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6186</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6186</guid>
		<description>Not sure what DirectX 9 benchmarks have to do with Fermi, given it&#039;s a DirectX 11 chip. The reason I switched to ATI was due to NVIDIA&#039;s repeated failures at producing the Fermi chip. Read the news, sheep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure what DirectX 9 benchmarks have to do with Fermi, given it&#8217;s a DirectX 11 chip. The reason I switched to ATI was due to NVIDIA&#8217;s repeated failures at producing the Fermi chip. Read the news, sheep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raphael is a moron</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6184</link>
		<dc:creator>Raphael is a moron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6184</guid>
		<description>&quot;NVIDIA’s Fermi chip is going to be a complete and utter failure, jump ship now.&quot;

Enjoy your shitty broken buggy ATI hardware and drivers and 30FPS slower DX11 slideshows. More like Raphael is a complete and utter failure, jump ship now.

http://www.bit-tech.net/gaming/pc/2009/12/01/directx-11-performance-first-look-dirt-2/3

&quot;The difference between DirectX 9 and DirectX 11 is clear, and it doesn&#039;t make for good reading for the new API. The average score in DirectX 11 is 30% slower than in DirectX 9. The story of minimum frame rates is even harder to ignore - in DirectX 9, the game is nearly 40% faster. &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;NVIDIA’s Fermi chip is going to be a complete and utter failure, jump ship now.&#8221;</p>
<p>Enjoy your shitty broken buggy ATI hardware and drivers and 30FPS slower DX11 slideshows. More like Raphael is a complete and utter failure, jump ship now.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bit-tech.net/gaming/pc/2009/12/01/directx-11-performance-first-look-dirt-2/3" rel="nofollow">http://www.bit-tech.net/gaming/pc/2009/12/01/directx-11-performance-first-look-dirt-2/3</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The difference between DirectX 9 and DirectX 11 is clear, and it doesn&#8217;t make for good reading for the new API. The average score in DirectX 11 is 30% slower than in DirectX 9. The story of minimum frame rates is even harder to ignore &#8211; in DirectX 9, the game is nearly 40% faster. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymuos</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6176</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymuos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 08:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6176</guid>
		<description>Or simply use PowerStrip to turn up the engine and memory clocks instead of voltages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or simply use PowerStrip to turn up the engine and memory clocks instead of voltages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafael</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6158</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6158</guid>
		<description>Make sure you also run it as an Administrator. It will show the same error if you&#039;re trying to execute it as a User.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Make sure you also run it as an Administrator. It will show the same error if you&#8217;re trying to execute it as a User.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrameBuffer</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6157</link>
		<dc:creator>FrameBuffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6157</guid>
		<description>Just DLed latest Redline from Sapphires site (http://www.sapphiretech.com/presentation/downloads/download_index_01.aspx?psn=0006) - SAPPHIRE_Redline_Overvolt_Utility_V1_633959667574 401665.1.zip dated Dec 9, 2009, using XIV32 and Go to Address $218 (as instructed above), the address shows as 03 already. Still not working get same error (Sorry, blah blah blah). Might install VS2008 and give it a go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just DLed latest Redline from Sapphires site (<a href="http://www.sapphiretech.com/presentation/downloads/download_index_01.aspx?psn=0006" rel="nofollow">http://www.sapphiretech.com/presentation/downloads/download_index_01.aspx?psn=0006</a>) &#8211; SAPPHIRE_Redline_Overvolt_Utility_V1_633959667574 401665.1.zip dated Dec 9, 2009, using XIV32 and Go to Address $218 (as instructed above), the address shows as 03 already. Still not working get same error (Sorry, blah blah blah). Might install VS2008 and give it a go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafa Ruano</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6151</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafa Ruano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 07:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6151</guid>
		<description>Hi , yesterday I installed your Anolis NT.X on my pc and it died , when I try to start it , never ends it is starting and restarting again and again , I can only acced to BIOS , did it happenned before , can you help please ????

Thanks &amp; excuse my english  ( I´m spanish)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi , yesterday I installed your Anolis NT.X on my pc and it died , when I try to start it , never ends it is starting and restarting again and again , I can only acced to BIOS , did it happenned before , can you help please ????</p>
<p>Thanks &amp; excuse my english  ( I´m spanish)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Sowul</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6144</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sowul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6144</guid>
		<description>The more important draw for me was that it fixes the attachment preview in Outlook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more important draw for me was that it fixes the attachment preview in Outlook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Singh400</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6142</link>
		<dc:creator>Singh400</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6142</guid>
		<description>@Mark Sowul: Thanks for that. I&#039;ve never really used the preview pane but I will now. Handy little fix thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark Sowul: Thanks for that. I&#8217;ve never really used the preview pane but I will now. Handy little fix thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattisdada</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6139</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattisdada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6139</guid>
		<description>@Leith
Not true

Depends what your doing. Several component within DX10 has components of DX9 running more efficiently. But DX10 also enhances certain parts as well, which decreases performance but looks nicer+has more developer features to use. 

Eg, shadowing and lighting has a few bits running more effectively, but most of it has been revamped to be more accurate and nicer looking (+by using less code to do so)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Leith<br />
Not true</p>
<p>Depends what your doing. Several component within DX10 has components of DX9 running more efficiently. But DX10 also enhances certain parts as well, which decreases performance but looks nicer+has more developer features to use. </p>
<p>Eg, shadowing and lighting has a few bits running more effectively, but most of it has been revamped to be more accurate and nicer looking (+by using less code to do so)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6138</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6138</guid>
		<description>10.1 and 11 are pretty damn fast. Try out the demo for BFBC2!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10.1 and 11 are pretty damn fast. Try out the demo for BFBC2!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leith</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6137</link>
		<dc:creator>Leith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6137</guid>
		<description>The idea that DX9 is always faster than DX10/11 is actually true. I tried a sample from the DirectX11 SDK that uses the same shader for DX9/11 render paths. On DX11 I get 700 FPS. On DX9 I get 900 FPS. It seems DX10/11 has more CPU overhead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea that DX9 is always faster than DX10/11 is actually true. I tried a sample from the DirectX11 SDK that uses the same shader for DX9/11 render paths. On DX11 I get 700 FPS. On DX9 I get 900 FPS. It seems DX10/11 has more CPU overhead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leith</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6136</link>
		<dc:creator>Leith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6136</guid>
		<description>Thats&#039;s interesting that it doesn&#039;t like fast PCs...
I always though it was not optimizied as other games that look just as good always seem to run faster than Crysis.
Hopefully Crysis 2 being a console game, the PC version will be optimized.

You can always play it on DX9 using that &#039;Ultra High&#039; config file hack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats&#8217;s interesting that it doesn&#8217;t like fast PCs&#8230;<br />
I always though it was not optimizied as other games that look just as good always seem to run faster than Crysis.<br />
Hopefully Crysis 2 being a console game, the PC version will be optimized.</p>
<p>You can always play it on DX9 using that &#8216;Ultra High&#8217; config file hack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafael</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6135</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6135</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t benchmarked Crysis, but I&#039;m not happy the game doesn&#039;t run well with AA turned on. I have 12GB of RAM, 4ghz CPU, and this video card and still can&#039;t play Crysis @ Very High/AA 12x. The game is fucked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t benchmarked Crysis, but I&#8217;m not happy the game doesn&#8217;t run well with AA turned on. I have 12GB of RAM, 4ghz CPU, and this video card and still can&#8217;t play Crysis @ Very High/AA 12x. The game is fucked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Sowul</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6134</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sowul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 15:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6134</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s like this gem from Adobe for fixing the PDF preview handler in 64 bit windows, which is even more pathetic.  It&#039;s been broken for years, and all it needs is a registry key to be changed for it to work.

http://www.ditii.com/2009/09/11/fix-for-adobe-pdf-preview-handler-bug-in-64-bit-windows/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s like this gem from Adobe for fixing the PDF preview handler in 64 bit windows, which is even more pathetic.  It&#8217;s been broken for years, and all it needs is a registry key to be changed for it to work.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ditii.com/2009/09/11/fix-for-adobe-pdf-preview-handler-bug-in-64-bit-windows/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ditii.com/2009/09/11/fix-for-adobe-pdf-preview-handler-bug-in-64-bit-windows/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6132</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 14:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6132</guid>
		<description>Addendum: Nevermind, I found one, and remembered I&#039;m using a class from CodeProject that has tons of it.  Joy, this&#039;ll be fun to debug.  I thought .NET caught stack corruption from P/Invoke. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Addendum: Nevermind, I found one, and remembered I&#8217;m using a class from CodeProject that has tons of it.  Joy, this&#8217;ll be fun to debug.  I thought .NET caught stack corruption from P/Invoke. :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6131</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 14:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6131</guid>
		<description>Ugh, recently I had a problem with one of my .NET programs.  It runs fine on 32bit XP but on 64bit 7 I get random crashes that the VS Express 2008 debugger won&#039;t catch, and that I can&#039;t pin down.  It can be reproducible in the same spot but then inserting debug statements totally changes where it crashes.  If I choose to debug the crashed program, VS2010 opens (I have the beta 2 installed side by side, for some reason 2008 is no longer in the debug list pfft) and declares the heap is corrupted, making it rather useless.

I don&#039;t even use P/Invoke in this app (I think, I should probably double check).

Hopefully turning off &quot;Any CPU&quot; and using x86 will fix it, haven&#039;t had the chance to really test it much and I&#039;m still not really sure that&#039;s the cause...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh, recently I had a problem with one of my .NET programs.  It runs fine on 32bit XP but on 64bit 7 I get random crashes that the VS Express 2008 debugger won&#8217;t catch, and that I can&#8217;t pin down.  It can be reproducible in the same spot but then inserting debug statements totally changes where it crashes.  If I choose to debug the crashed program, VS2010 opens (I have the beta 2 installed side by side, for some reason 2008 is no longer in the debug list pfft) and declares the heap is corrupted, making it rather useless.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t even use P/Invoke in this app (I think, I should probably double check).</p>
<p>Hopefully turning off &#8220;Any CPU&#8221; and using x86 will fix it, haven&#8217;t had the chance to really test it much and I&#8217;m still not really sure that&#8217;s the cause&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leith</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6130</link>
		<dc:creator>Leith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 09:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6130</guid>
		<description>Also what frames are you seeing in say, Crysis?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also what frames are you seeing in say, Crysis?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leith</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6129</link>
		<dc:creator>Leith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 09:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/01/31/sapphires-redline-breaks-on-64-bit-due-to-compile-error/#comment-6129</guid>
		<description>Did you remove that hideous heat-sink sticker?

Anyway why do you need to use Sapphire&#039;s volt mod tool. There are plenty of other tools by other 5970 vendors that should work (as long as they don&#039;t check vendor IDs). Failing that you could just use AMD&#039;s generic volt mod tool they gave to reviewers, or just use the best 5000 series over-clocking tool, MSI Afterburner.

Can&#039;t sleep tonight due to the fact my 5850 will arrive tomorrow... Lets hope the courier is nice and early...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you remove that hideous heat-sink sticker?</p>
<p>Anyway why do you need to use Sapphire&#8217;s volt mod tool. There are plenty of other tools by other 5970 vendors that should work (as long as they don&#8217;t check vendor IDs). Failing that you could just use AMD&#8217;s generic volt mod tool they gave to reviewers, or just use the best 5000 series over-clocking tool, MSI Afterburner.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t sleep tonight due to the fact my 5850 will arrive tomorrow&#8230; Lets hope the courier is nice and early&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

