<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows XP Mode Internals &#8211; Part 1 (Overview)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/</link>
	<description>Not your usual Microsoft enthusiast blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:11:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan Albright</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/comment-page-2/#comment-5211</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Albright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/#comment-5211</guid>
		<description>I have messed up the credentials used to access Windows XP Mode.  I tried using my network login instead of the default and that didn&#039;t work.  Does anyone know what the default domain and username are?  I know the password.

Thanks,

Alan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have messed up the credentials used to access Windows XP Mode.  I tried using my network login instead of the default and that didn&#8217;t work.  Does anyone know what the default domain and username are?  I know the password.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Alan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Crabtree</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/comment-page-2/#comment-5191</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Crabtree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/#comment-5191</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the score on using pre-existing virtual machines (such as Win 98SE or Linux) created on older versions of Virtual PC within the new Virtual PC?

Bob C</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the score on using pre-existing virtual machines (such as Win 98SE or Linux) created on older versions of Virtual PC within the new Virtual PC?</p>
<p>Bob C</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Hass</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/comment-page-2/#comment-4936</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Hass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/#comment-4936</guid>
		<description>Seems a lot of interpretive explanations for &quot;Windows XP Mode&quot; what is in fact simply the means to run XP Programs that are not compatible in windows 7.

Obviously you only qualify for Windows XP Mode if you have purchased Windows 7 Professional, Enterprise, or Ultimate, and yes, although not given to you, the installation automatically has an XP ID and is loaded with a Key for the Windows XP Pro SP3 installation for Windows XP Mode.

However at the end of the day, all it is and achieves is, what &quot;Compatibility Mode&quot; did in Vista and the result is the same! i.e. allows you to run 3rd party XP only compatible programs in a Windows 7 environment that are not compatible in Windows 7 !

This could also have come about because someone forgot to put &quot;Compatibility Mode&quot; in Windows 7, so as an after thought they invented a new method of doing the same and called it &quot;Windows XP Mode&quot;

And the rest is Microsoft Marketing Propaganda and Hype to ween you completely of XP and hope that the new exaggerations and claims of Windows 7, replacing the unpopular Vista and failed targeted sales, will now be recovered in Windows 7 launch, which in my mind is simply a SP for Vista with a new name!

BTW:  The upgrade from XP Pro SP3 to Windows 7 is not worth the effort if you have a lot of 3rd party XP programs loaded! Strongly suggest that you check the Windows 7 compatibility of all your XP programs!

Happy Computing Folks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems a lot of interpretive explanations for &#8220;Windows XP Mode&#8221; what is in fact simply the means to run XP Programs that are not compatible in windows 7.</p>
<p>Obviously you only qualify for Windows XP Mode if you have purchased Windows 7 Professional, Enterprise, or Ultimate, and yes, although not given to you, the installation automatically has an XP ID and is loaded with a Key for the Windows XP Pro SP3 installation for Windows XP Mode.</p>
<p>However at the end of the day, all it is and achieves is, what &#8220;Compatibility Mode&#8221; did in Vista and the result is the same! i.e. allows you to run 3rd party XP only compatible programs in a Windows 7 environment that are not compatible in Windows 7 !</p>
<p>This could also have come about because someone forgot to put &#8220;Compatibility Mode&#8221; in Windows 7, so as an after thought they invented a new method of doing the same and called it &#8220;Windows XP Mode&#8221;</p>
<p>And the rest is Microsoft Marketing Propaganda and Hype to ween you completely of XP and hope that the new exaggerations and claims of Windows 7, replacing the unpopular Vista and failed targeted sales, will now be recovered in Windows 7 launch, which in my mind is simply a SP for Vista with a new name!</p>
<p>BTW:  The upgrade from XP Pro SP3 to Windows 7 is not worth the effort if you have a lot of 3rd party XP programs loaded! Strongly suggest that you check the Windows 7 compatibility of all your XP programs!</p>
<p>Happy Computing Folks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows Xp mode et Windows 7 @ Richard Messier</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/comment-page-2/#comment-4586</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows Xp mode et Windows 7 @ Richard Messier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/#comment-4586</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/" rel="nofollow">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/</a> [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Luey</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/comment-page-2/#comment-4455</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Luey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/#comment-4455</guid>
		<description>In preparation for possible upgrade to 64bit Windows 7 one of my concerns is my 16 bit text mode financial software- (Quicken 7 believe it or not).  It works just fine (the Intuit people don&#039;t believe this!) in an 32 bit XP command prompt and even prints to an network printer that it thinks is on LPT1 (@NET USE LPT1: \\RALUEY\HPLJP3005  /PERSISTENT:YES).

It sounds like Virtual XP may be the answer.  Any feedback appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In preparation for possible upgrade to 64bit Windows 7 one of my concerns is my 16 bit text mode financial software- (Quicken 7 believe it or not).  It works just fine (the Intuit people don&#8217;t believe this!) in an 32 bit XP command prompt and even prints to an network printer that it thinks is on LPT1 (@NET USE LPT1: \\RALUEY\HPLJP3005  /PERSISTENT:YES).</p>
<p>It sounds like Virtual XP may be the answer.  Any feedback appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/comment-page-2/#comment-4346</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/#comment-4346</guid>
		<description>I just installed the Virtual PC and then downloaded the Virtual XP.  When I run the virtual machine for the first time, I see the EULA, user info and status bars.  It take a very long time to run and would eventually fail with an error message.  I saw on another site that if you press Control Esc, it will bring up the actual console view rather than the progress bars.  This was somewhat helpful.  I was able to see the Windows scripting window seemed to be stuck.  So I simply closed the box and windows continued to load.  I thought I was out of the woods... well the woods got bigger.  When after I ran all the XP updates and restarted the virtual machine, it was like DeJaVu.  The same EULA and progress bars came up again... So I think something wasn&#039;t fully setup or saved properly.  Anyone else having this sort of trouble?  Solutions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just installed the Virtual PC and then downloaded the Virtual XP.  When I run the virtual machine for the first time, I see the EULA, user info and status bars.  It take a very long time to run and would eventually fail with an error message.  I saw on another site that if you press Control Esc, it will bring up the actual console view rather than the progress bars.  This was somewhat helpful.  I was able to see the Windows scripting window seemed to be stuck.  So I simply closed the box and windows continued to load.  I thought I was out of the woods&#8230; well the woods got bigger.  When after I ran all the XP updates and restarted the virtual machine, it was like DeJaVu.  The same EULA and progress bars came up again&#8230; So I think something wasn&#8217;t fully setup or saved properly.  Anyone else having this sort of trouble?  Solutions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dion</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/comment-page-2/#comment-3551</link>
		<dc:creator>Dion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/#comment-3551</guid>
		<description>Is there a way to use XP compatible hardware in the XPmode?  In 7&#039;s device manager I see my custom HW board without a valid driver, when running in Virtual XP mode the board doesn&#039;t show up in device manager.  I understand I am looking at virtual drivers at this point, however, is there or will there be a way to install the XP driver in virutal mode?

Thanks,
Dion</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a way to use XP compatible hardware in the XPmode?  In 7&#8217;s device manager I see my custom HW board without a valid driver, when running in Virtual XP mode the board doesn&#8217;t show up in device manager.  I understand I am looking at virtual drivers at this point, however, is there or will there be a way to install the XP driver in virutal mode?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Dion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon Leung</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/comment-page-2/#comment-3549</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Leung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/#comment-3549</guid>
		<description>Hi there, 

I&#039;ve downloaded the VPC and the XPMode, and I&#039;m also sure that the virtualization is enabled in the bios.
After I 1st start the XPmode by clicking the link on the windows 7 start menu, and accepting the terms, entering the user name and password, as soon as it starts to configure, &quot;setting up Virtual Windows XP for first use&quot;, the process that was said to be not &quot;speedy &quot; above, the whole Windows 7 just restarts. I&#039;ve tried for at least 5 times and it does the same thing, keeps restarting. Can someone tell me what is the problem?

It would be great if I could get an email reply :sharonskleung@hotmail.com

thank you very much.

Sharon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there, </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve downloaded the VPC and the XPMode, and I&#8217;m also sure that the virtualization is enabled in the bios.<br />
After I 1st start the XPmode by clicking the link on the windows 7 start menu, and accepting the terms, entering the user name and password, as soon as it starts to configure, &#8220;setting up Virtual Windows XP for first use&#8221;, the process that was said to be not &#8220;speedy &#8221; above, the whole Windows 7 just restarts. I&#8217;ve tried for at least 5 times and it does the same thing, keeps restarting. Can someone tell me what is the problem?</p>
<p>It would be great if I could get an email reply :sharonskleung@hotmail.com</p>
<p>thank you very much.</p>
<p>Sharon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rben</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/comment-page-2/#comment-3524</link>
		<dc:creator>Rben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/#comment-3524</guid>
		<description>Found it... just Disable/Enable Auto Publish in the VM settings. It&#039;s strange however that the Applications Folder does not show up on first run although the Auto Publish option is enabled by default.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found it&#8230; just Disable/Enable Auto Publish in the VM settings. It&#8217;s strange however that the Applications Folder does not show up on first run although the Auto Publish option is enabled by default.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rben</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/comment-page-1/#comment-3523</link>
		<dc:creator>Rben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/#comment-3523</guid>
		<description>Lorloki, me meither and I am using the x64 bits. Did you find a way to enable it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lorloki, me meither and I am using the x64 bits. Did you find a way to enable it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows 7 RC Disponible para descarga - Fecha de lanzamiento Filtrada - XP Mode &#171; Mario OC&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/comment-page-1/#comment-3522</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows 7 RC Disponible para descarga - Fecha de lanzamiento Filtrada - XP Mode &#171; Mario OC&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/#comment-3522</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/" rel="nofollow">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/</a> [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avs</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/comment-page-1/#comment-3504</link>
		<dc:creator>Avs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/#comment-3504</guid>
		<description>Awesome Post man</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome Post man</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/comment-page-1/#comment-3485</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/#comment-3485</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been pasting applications into the All Users Start Menu folder, and not all of them appear. Eg: Notepad, IE6, Firefox appears in Windows 7, But MSPaint, Minesweeper, and most the the default installed XP apps do not show up. How come?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been pasting applications into the All Users Start Menu folder, and not all of them appear. Eg: Notepad, IE6, Firefox appears in Windows 7, But MSPaint, Minesweeper, and most the the default installed XP apps do not show up. How come?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roberttt</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/comment-page-1/#comment-3476</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberttt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/#comment-3476</guid>
		<description>I have a question... When you use Virtual PC to emulate Windows XP (or any other OS), your actual Hardware -does not- get emulated, and instead, the OS starts using the Virtual PC&#039;s drivers (I.E. a Standard VGA video card which won&#039;t support Direct3D, making XPM really useless to use for applications like AutoCad or Video Games).

Is this XPM going to use our actual Hardware (I.E. our nVidia or ATI videocard, sound card, etc) or will it be just another Virtual PC with Windows 7 integration capabilities?

See ya^^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question&#8230; When you use Virtual PC to emulate Windows XP (or any other OS), your actual Hardware -does not- get emulated, and instead, the OS starts using the Virtual PC&#8217;s drivers (I.E. a Standard VGA video card which won&#8217;t support Direct3D, making XPM really useless to use for applications like AutoCad or Video Games).</p>
<p>Is this XPM going to use our actual Hardware (I.E. our nVidia or ATI videocard, sound card, etc) or will it be just another Virtual PC with Windows 7 integration capabilities?</p>
<p>See ya^^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lordloki</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/comment-page-1/#comment-3475</link>
		<dc:creator>lordloki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/#comment-3475</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t seem to be getting the Virtual XP Applications folder ... is there a way to force this?  Or have I perhaps done something wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t seem to be getting the Virtual XP Applications folder &#8230; is there a way to force this?  Or have I perhaps done something wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Fleischer</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/comment-page-1/#comment-3441</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Fleischer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/#comment-3441</guid>
		<description>The question of anti-virus for virtual machines comes up frequently in the Virtual PC newsgroup, and the frequent answer is this:  treat it as you would a real machine.  If it&#039;s on your network, treat it as a real machine on your network.  If it shares folders, you have yet another area of exposure.  

I can imagine that XPM could have a set of more protected interfaces that reduce the exposure, but since the objective is to have Windows XP-based computation accessible on your real machine, I would bet that there are considerable areas of exposure.

Given that, I make extensive use of Virtual PC and have about two dozen virtual machines (different operating systems, different configurations) for testing.  I don&#039;t use anti-virus software because most of my virtual machines are fired up so rarely that they would always be out-of-date when I started them, and I always use undo disks and start from a known configuration.  (However, I do run Windows Defender if it is part of the particular system -- what does it &quot;defend&quot; against, anyway?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question of anti-virus for virtual machines comes up frequently in the Virtual PC newsgroup, and the frequent answer is this:  treat it as you would a real machine.  If it&#8217;s on your network, treat it as a real machine on your network.  If it shares folders, you have yet another area of exposure.  </p>
<p>I can imagine that XPM could have a set of more protected interfaces that reduce the exposure, but since the objective is to have Windows XP-based computation accessible on your real machine, I would bet that there are considerable areas of exposure.</p>
<p>Given that, I make extensive use of Virtual PC and have about two dozen virtual machines (different operating systems, different configurations) for testing.  I don&#8217;t use anti-virus software because most of my virtual machines are fired up so rarely that they would always be out-of-date when I started them, and I always use undo disks and start from a known configuration.  (However, I do run Windows Defender if it is part of the particular system &#8212; what does it &#8220;defend&#8221; against, anyway?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Modo XP de Windows 7 bajo la lupa &#124; MuyWindows</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/comment-page-1/#comment-3437</link>
		<dc:creator>El Modo XP de Windows 7 bajo la lupa &#124; MuyWindows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/#comment-3437</guid>
		<description>[...] su blog Within Windows Rafael Rivera nos cuenta en entregas detalles técnicos de la solución. Lo primero lo que ya sabíamos: en el corazón de [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] su blog Within Windows Rafael Rivera nos cuenta en entregas detalles técnicos de la solución. Lo primero lo que ya sabíamos: en el corazón de [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XPirate</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/comment-page-1/#comment-3434</link>
		<dc:creator>XPirate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/#comment-3434</guid>
		<description>@Billwil, but that&#039;s because App-V is unable to sequence OS components. Certain OS components up to XP that are really installed later using INF-based installs (instead of merely &quot;enabled&quot;) can be sequenced. The pre-installed components can&#039;t be sequenced. If Microsoft really componentized each component (such as IE, instead of merely hiding it when turned off) such that it is installed after the base minimal OS required to boot (and used methods of adding and removing components that are sequencing friendly unlike NT 6.x&#039;s Component Based Servicing, App-V can serve users for app/OS compatibility.

Also, VPC doesn&#039;t support games because MS didn&#039;t add Direct3D and OpenGL support and didn&#039;t supply a WDDM compatible driver with later OSes that works with virtualized hardware of VMs that support Direct3D 9.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Billwil, but that&#8217;s because App-V is unable to sequence OS components. Certain OS components up to XP that are really installed later using INF-based installs (instead of merely &#8220;enabled&#8221;) can be sequenced. The pre-installed components can&#8217;t be sequenced. If Microsoft really componentized each component (such as IE, instead of merely hiding it when turned off) such that it is installed after the base minimal OS required to boot (and used methods of adding and removing components that are sequencing friendly unlike NT 6.x&#8217;s Component Based Servicing, App-V can serve users for app/OS compatibility.</p>
<p>Also, VPC doesn&#8217;t support games because MS didn&#8217;t add Direct3D and OpenGL support and didn&#8217;t supply a WDDM compatible driver with later OSes that works with virtualized hardware of VMs that support Direct3D 9.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/comment-page-1/#comment-3430</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/#comment-3430</guid>
		<description>Kulin: From what I&#039;ve read so far the answer is no. Some games will work but no all and not at the best frame rates. Unfortunately it&#039;s not aimed for that rather business software compatibility.

Francisco: To be fully covered then yes, you will need one for each. However, since the XP is virtualized it shouldn&#039;t infect the rest of Windows if you do get caught, and it&#039;s easy to reset a virtual machine, so in day to day use it&#039;s not really necessary. Think Mac-like (thou for different reasons): in theory yes malware could be a problem, but in practice it&#039;s unlikely.

Hamachi: Yes and no. Believe you can only run one Virtual Machine at a time, Thus, IE8 would be Win7 and IE6 Virtual Win XP, leaving no scope for running IE7. Fortunately, though the Microsoft Expression team have recently released a free download that allows IE7 and IE8 rendering/comparison so you can always use that.

Oh, according to Paul Thurrott XPM will actually support other OS&#039;s (not sure exactly which though).

Thus, I guess it&#039;s best to think of WXM as just a newer version of Microsoft&#039;s Virtual PC product coupled with a XP SP3 disc image and licence. The new features being tailored to Win7 and integrating the virtualization with the Win7 desktop (so end-users don&#039;t have to run two clear different desktops; although for setup etc they do still exist).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kulin: From what I&#8217;ve read so far the answer is no. Some games will work but no all and not at the best frame rates. Unfortunately it&#8217;s not aimed for that rather business software compatibility.</p>
<p>Francisco: To be fully covered then yes, you will need one for each. However, since the XP is virtualized it shouldn&#8217;t infect the rest of Windows if you do get caught, and it&#8217;s easy to reset a virtual machine, so in day to day use it&#8217;s not really necessary. Think Mac-like (thou for different reasons): in theory yes malware could be a problem, but in practice it&#8217;s unlikely.</p>
<p>Hamachi: Yes and no. Believe you can only run one Virtual Machine at a time, Thus, IE8 would be Win7 and IE6 Virtual Win XP, leaving no scope for running IE7. Fortunately, though the Microsoft Expression team have recently released a free download that allows IE7 and IE8 rendering/comparison so you can always use that.</p>
<p>Oh, according to Paul Thurrott XPM will actually support other OS&#8217;s (not sure exactly which though).</p>
<p>Thus, I guess it&#8217;s best to think of WXM as just a newer version of Microsoft&#8217;s Virtual PC product coupled with a XP SP3 disc image and licence. The new features being tailored to Win7 and integrating the virtualization with the Win7 desktop (so end-users don&#8217;t have to run two clear different desktops; although for setup etc they do still exist).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hamachi</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/comment-page-1/#comment-3419</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamachi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/#comment-3419</guid>
		<description>Hi!

Could I run native IE8 simultaneously side-by-side with virtual IE6 *and* IE7?

Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!</p>
<p>Could I run native IE8 simultaneously side-by-side with virtual IE6 *and* IE7?</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Rune Berg</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/comment-page-1/#comment-3418</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Rune Berg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/#comment-3418</guid>
		<description>@Adam:

That is fairly correct, though IMHO Virtual PC was more like a simpler version of vmware player with the ability to make new virtual machines than the fullblown mature feature rich package that is vmware workstation ;)

@Kulin:
No idea if XPM supports hw 3D accelleration, but you should try vmware workstation 6.5 or vmware fusion (on Mac) 30 day trials. They have 3D in virtual machines.... Much of DirectX9 even...

@Francisco:
Technically, that seems likely/the case.

@Larry Smith
&lt;i&gt;1) Will the copy of VPC 7 be usable with other VMs&lt;/i&gt;
It seems like XPM is really a bundled package of a new version of Virtual PC with Windows XP. Ironically, with the name being Virtual PC 7 and everything, this is EXACTLY like the deal Microsoft offered Mac owners before when you bought Virtual PC 7 for MacOS X with a bundled Windows XP SP2 licence that got automatically installed and setup for you. Yet you still got the complete Virtual PC product and could create other new VMs as well, running any OS capable of running in Virtual PC (which includes some Linux distributions with more or less success)

&lt;i&gt;3) I assume XPM will be available on both 32 and 64 bit versions of Win7?&lt;/i&gt;
Virtual PC 2007 runs on both 32-bit and 64-bit WinXP and Vista, though only supporting 32-bit guests. I guess it remains to be seen if VPC7 introduces 64-bit guest support however :)

&lt;i&gt;4) Do we get 2 versions of XP, 32-bit on Win7-32 and 64-bit on Win7-64? Or is always the 32-bit XP version?&lt;/i&gt;
Given that the product is designed to facilitate compatibility with older ill-behaved applications, and Microsoft are trying to take a clean break with the past in their 64-bit portfolio, it will be bundled with WinXP 32 bit only, irregardless of 32/64-bit of the product itself. However, it remains to be seen if it introduce 64-bit guest support, in which case you can always install WinXP x64 yourself ;)

&lt;i&gt;5) If it’s the 32-bit version, I guess this means that we can still run 16-bit apps (I still have a few old games!), even under Win7-64?&lt;/i&gt;
That would be one of the benefits, yes. Its technically an enclosed PC with 32-bit WinXP after all. And of course you can always create your own virtual machine and run Win 3.11 or Windows 98 ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Adam:</p>
<p>That is fairly correct, though IMHO Virtual PC was more like a simpler version of vmware player with the ability to make new virtual machines than the fullblown mature feature rich package that is vmware workstation ;)</p>
<p>@Kulin:<br />
No idea if XPM supports hw 3D accelleration, but you should try vmware workstation 6.5 or vmware fusion (on Mac) 30 day trials. They have 3D in virtual machines&#8230;. Much of DirectX9 even&#8230;</p>
<p>@Francisco:<br />
Technically, that seems likely/the case.</p>
<p>@Larry Smith<br />
<i>1) Will the copy of VPC 7 be usable with other VMs</i><br />
It seems like XPM is really a bundled package of a new version of Virtual PC with Windows XP. Ironically, with the name being Virtual PC 7 and everything, this is EXACTLY like the deal Microsoft offered Mac owners before when you bought Virtual PC 7 for MacOS X with a bundled Windows XP SP2 licence that got automatically installed and setup for you. Yet you still got the complete Virtual PC product and could create other new VMs as well, running any OS capable of running in Virtual PC (which includes some Linux distributions with more or less success)</p>
<p><i>3) I assume XPM will be available on both 32 and 64 bit versions of Win7?</i><br />
Virtual PC 2007 runs on both 32-bit and 64-bit WinXP and Vista, though only supporting 32-bit guests. I guess it remains to be seen if VPC7 introduces 64-bit guest support however :)</p>
<p><i>4) Do we get 2 versions of XP, 32-bit on Win7-32 and 64-bit on Win7-64? Or is always the 32-bit XP version?</i><br />
Given that the product is designed to facilitate compatibility with older ill-behaved applications, and Microsoft are trying to take a clean break with the past in their 64-bit portfolio, it will be bundled with WinXP 32 bit only, irregardless of 32/64-bit of the product itself. However, it remains to be seen if it introduce 64-bit guest support, in which case you can always install WinXP x64 yourself ;)</p>
<p><i>5) If it’s the 32-bit version, I guess this means that we can still run 16-bit apps (I still have a few old games!), even under Win7-64?</i><br />
That would be one of the benefits, yes. Its technically an enclosed PC with 32-bit WinXP after all. And of course you can always create your own virtual machine and run Win 3.11 or Windows 98 ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francisco</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/comment-page-1/#comment-3417</link>
		<dc:creator>Francisco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/#comment-3417</guid>
		<description>How will XPM deal with viruses and malware?
Even if XPM is an isolated component of Windows 7, do I have to buy/install two antivirus programs? (one for win7 and the other for XPM)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How will XPM deal with viruses and malware?<br />
Even if XPM is an isolated component of Windows 7, do I have to buy/install two antivirus programs? (one for win7 and the other for XPM)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kulin</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/comment-page-1/#comment-3415</link>
		<dc:creator>Kulin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/#comment-3415</guid>
		<description>Please give me some indication of whether XPM is capable of hosting the 3D accelerated games of today &amp; tomorrow (with acceptable framerates :)) That&#039;d be good to know if purely from a curiosity perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please give me some indication of whether XPM is capable of hosting the 3D accelerated games of today &amp; tomorrow (with acceptable framerates :)) That&#8217;d be good to know if purely from a curiosity perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/comment-page-1/#comment-3413</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/#comment-3413</guid>
		<description>billwill: So are you saying APP-V is Microsoft&#039;s answer to VMWare&#039;s Thinapp? ie. just packages software with the files they require, and in case of APP-V are then streamed from a server?

That would in turn make Virtual PC equivalent to WMWare Workstation, and MED-V the same but with stream from server (think that&#039;s the Infrastructure software in VMWare world, no?).

Is that correct?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>billwill: So are you saying APP-V is Microsoft&#8217;s answer to VMWare&#8217;s Thinapp? ie. just packages software with the files they require, and in case of APP-V are then streamed from a server?</p>
<p>That would in turn make Virtual PC equivalent to WMWare Workstation, and MED-V the same but with stream from server (think that&#8217;s the Infrastructure software in VMWare world, no?).</p>
<p>Is that correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/comment-page-1/#comment-3412</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/25/windows-xp-mode-internals-part-1-overview/#comment-3412</guid>
		<description>Jerry: Depends on which part isn&#039;t compatible - if it&#039;s Premiere Pro that&#039;s not Vista/Win7 compatible then it&#039;s a possibility; but if it&#039;s the drivers for the Matrox card then it will definitely be no go, ie. the &#039;virtual pc&#039; relies on the hardware support of the native Windows version. Even then not all functions are passed through, eg some of DirectX, hence why Virtual PCs aren&#039;t an option for most games.

You can always try it in Vista or Win7 by running with the current release of VirtualPC or VMWare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerry: Depends on which part isn&#8217;t compatible &#8211; if it&#8217;s Premiere Pro that&#8217;s not Vista/Win7 compatible then it&#8217;s a possibility; but if it&#8217;s the drivers for the Matrox card then it will definitely be no go, ie. the &#8216;virtual pc&#8217; relies on the hardware support of the native Windows version. Even then not all functions are passed through, eg some of DirectX, hence why Virtual PCs aren&#8217;t an option for most games.</p>
<p>You can always try it in Vista or Win7 by running with the current release of VirtualPC or VMWare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
