<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Less obscure Microsoft Office 14 64-bit evidence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/</link>
	<description>Not your usual Microsoft enthusiast blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:11:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-3903</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/#comment-3903</guid>
		<description>Shame they also didn&#039;t skip v14. 14 in Chinese sounds like &quot;Definitely Die&quot; and is incredibly unlucky in Asian culture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shame they also didn&#8217;t skip v14. 14 in Chinese sounds like &#8220;Definitely Die&#8221; and is incredibly unlucky in Asian culture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calvin</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-3214</link>
		<dc:creator>Calvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/#comment-3214</guid>
		<description>@Stephen: It&#039;s (4) also a subject of superstitson elsewhere in the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Stephen: It&#8217;s (4) also a subject of superstitson elsewhere in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft: No Office 2010 beta for you &#171; BREAKING IT NEWS FOR BUSINESS</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-3142</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft: No Office 2010 beta for you &#171; BREAKING IT NEWS FOR BUSINESS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/#comment-3142</guid>
		<description>[...] who sparked criticism of Windows 7&#8217;s redesigned User Account Control (UAC) two months ago, reported that an Office 2010 add-on posted to the Microsoft download site was specific to 64-bit. The add-on, dated April 9, 2009, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] who sparked criticism of Windows 7&#8217;s redesigned User Account Control (UAC) two months ago, reported that an Office 2010 add-on posted to the Microsoft download site was specific to 64-bit. The add-on, dated April 9, 2009, and [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-3139</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/#comment-3139</guid>
		<description>Hey, Symbian skipped S60 4th edition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Symbian skipped S60 4th edition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pizzaboy192</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-3137</link>
		<dc:creator>Pizzaboy192</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/#comment-3137</guid>
		<description>[offtopic] yeah, both the xbox 720 and the xbox eXtreme are just rumors... imho, i think that the 720 would be a lame name for the next-gen xbox, seeing as it would make the development team and marketing teams both appear really lazy, and uncreative [/offtopic]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[offtopic] yeah, both the xbox 720 and the xbox eXtreme are just rumors&#8230; imho, i think that the 720 would be a lame name for the next-gen xbox, seeing as it would make the development team and marketing teams both appear really lazy, and uncreative [/offtopic]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Office 2010 to have 32-bit, 64-bit flavors, Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-3132</link>
		<dc:creator>Office 2010 to have 32-bit, 64-bit flavors, Microsoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/#comment-3132</guid>
		<description>[...] rumors running about Office 2010 shipping in 32-bit and 64-bit versions. Check out this post and Within Windows to see how the conclusion was drawn. Everything pointed to Microsoft finally offering a 64-bit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rumors running about Office 2010 shipping in 32-bit and 64-bit versions. Check out this post and Within Windows to see how the conclusion was drawn. Everything pointed to Microsoft finally offering a 64-bit [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Confirmed: Office 2010 will come in 32-bit, 64-bit flavors &#124; Tech-Talks.com</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-3127</link>
		<dc:creator>Confirmed: Office 2010 will come in 32-bit, 64-bit flavors &#124; Tech-Talks.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/#comment-3127</guid>
		<description>[...] flying around in regard to Office 2010 shipping in 32-bit and 64-bit versions. Check out ZDNet and Within Windows to see how the conclusion was drawn. Everything pointed to Microsoft finally offering a 64-bit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] flying around in regard to Office 2010 shipping in 32-bit and 64-bit versions. Check out ZDNet and Within Windows to see how the conclusion was drawn. Everything pointed to Microsoft finally offering a 64-bit [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Confirmed: Office 2010 will come in 32-bit, 64-bit flavors &#124; Supossably</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-3126</link>
		<dc:creator>Confirmed: Office 2010 will come in 32-bit, 64-bit flavors &#124; Supossably</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/#comment-3126</guid>
		<description>[...] flying around in regard to Office 2010 shipping in 32-bit and 64-bit versions. Check out ZDNet and Within Windows to see how the conclusion was drawn. Everything pointed to Microsoft finally offering a 64-bit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] flying around in regard to Office 2010 shipping in 32-bit and 64-bit versions. Check out ZDNet and Within Windows to see how the conclusion was drawn. Everything pointed to Microsoft finally offering a 64-bit [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jake</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-3119</link>
		<dc:creator>jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/#comment-3119</guid>
		<description>(offtopic) isant xbox 720 the made up name buy some people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(offtopic) isant xbox 720 the made up name buy some people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pizzaboy192</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-3118</link>
		<dc:creator>pizzaboy192</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/#comment-3118</guid>
		<description>[offtopic] i heard it was gonna be called the Xbox eXtreme [/offtopic]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[offtopic] i heard it was gonna be called the Xbox eXtreme [/offtopic]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: _&#124;&#124;_</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-3117</link>
		<dc:creator>_&#124;&#124;_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/#comment-3117</guid>
		<description>No, it&#039;s just more 7 love: Windows 7, Office 14, Xbox 720   :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it&#8217;s just more 7 love: Windows 7, Office 14, Xbox 720   :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pizzaboy192</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-3116</link>
		<dc:creator>pizzaboy192</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/#comment-3116</guid>
		<description>I  was thinking that office 13 just happened to be the Mac version... since they are released seperate of each other...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I  was thinking that office 13 just happened to be the Mac version&#8230; since they are released seperate of each other&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafael</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-3115</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/#comment-3115</guid>
		<description>@jake: Was a typo, thanks for the heads up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jake: Was a typo, thanks for the heads up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Habrá Office 14 de 64 bits &#171; Tecnologia, Actualidad,y mucho mas&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-3114</link>
		<dc:creator>Habrá Office 14 de 64 bits &#171; Tecnologia, Actualidad,y mucho mas&#8230;.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/#comment-3114</guid>
		<description>[...] la existencia de esta versión de la que no hay anuncio oficial aún. La presencia de esta descarga la apuntaron en el blog Within Windows de Rafael [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] la existencia de esta versión de la que no hay anuncio oficial aún. La presencia de esta descarga la apuntaron en el blog Within Windows de Rafael [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommo</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-3112</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/#comment-3112</guid>
		<description>Some peoples are missing some thingssss :O:O:O</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some peoples are missing some thingssss :O:O:O</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent Bethmann</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-3110</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Bethmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/#comment-3110</guid>
		<description>I personally hate it when Microsoft or any other company skips version numbers. &quot;Unlucky number&quot;...  we are not in the medieval time. Does Microsofts burn witches too? Skipping a number makes thousand people ask &quot;what happened to Office 13&quot; etc. like Al Lowe did with his game &quot;Leisure Suit Larry&quot; years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally hate it when Microsoft or any other company skips version numbers. &#8220;Unlucky number&#8221;&#8230;  we are not in the medieval time. Does Microsofts burn witches too? Skipping a number makes thousand people ask &#8220;what happened to Office 13&#8243; etc. like Al Lowe did with his game &#8220;Leisure Suit Larry&#8221; years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jake</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-3109</link>
		<dc:creator>jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/#comment-3109</guid>
		<description>yea thats what mine says in word 2007 sp1
i would of thought rafael knew office 12 was 2007</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yea thats what mine says in word 2007 sp1<br />
i would of thought rafael knew office 12 was 2007</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-3108</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/#comment-3108</guid>
		<description>Correct (I didn&#039;t know they skipped 13!).  The full version for Word 2007 SP1 is:

Microsoft® Office Word 2007 (12.0.6331.5000) SP1 MSO (12.0.6320.5000)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct (I didn&#8217;t know they skipped 13!).  The full version for Word 2007 SP1 is:</p>
<p>Microsoft® Office Word 2007 (12.0.6331.5000) SP1 MSO (12.0.6320.5000)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jake</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-3106</link>
		<dc:creator>jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/04/10/less-obscure-microsoft-office-14-64-bit-evidence/#comment-3106</guid>
		<description>office 12 was office 2007 they skiped office 13 becasue 13 is an unlucky number</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>office 12 was office 2007 they skiped office 13 becasue 13 is an unlucky number</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
