<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows 7 auto-elevation mistake lets malware elevate freely, easily</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-lets-malware-elevate-freely-easily/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-lets-malware-elevate-freely-easily/</link>
	<description>Not your usual Microsoft enthusiast blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:11:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pearl Tech &#187; Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-lets-malware-elevate-freely-easily/comment-page-2/#comment-4341</link>
		<dc:creator>Pearl Tech &#187; Blog Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-let-malware-elevate-freely-easily/#comment-4341</guid>
		<description>[...] in the week, independent researchers Rafael Rivera and Long Zheng described an exploit that could turn off the UAC prompt, which typically notifies [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the week, independent researchers Rafael Rivera and Long Zheng described an exploit that could turn off the UAC prompt, which typically notifies [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why upgrade to Vista when Windows 7 will be here soon? &#124; OS Attack</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-lets-malware-elevate-freely-easily/comment-page-2/#comment-3734</link>
		<dc:creator>Why upgrade to Vista when Windows 7 will be here soon? &#124; OS Attack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-let-malware-elevate-freely-easily/#comment-3734</guid>
		<description>[...] change with UAC in Windows 7 that essentially makes it less secure than Windows Vista. Rafael of Within Windows then posted about applications that have been White Listed and are automatically elevated to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] change with UAC in Windows 7 that essentially makes it less secure than Windows Vista. Rafael of Within Windows then posted about applications that have been White Listed and are automatically elevated to the [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: бaкинeц</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-lets-malware-elevate-freely-easily/comment-page-2/#comment-3629</link>
		<dc:creator>бaкинeц</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-let-malware-elevate-freely-easily/#comment-3629</guid>
		<description>Глубокоуважаемые, а нельзя оставлять комментарии по теме, а не разную глупость типа Автор молодец и т.д.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Глубокоуважаемые, а нельзя оставлять комментарии по теме, а не разную глупость типа Автор молодец и т.д.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tutto quello che c&#8217;è da sapere su Windows 7 &#171; Guiodic Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-lets-malware-elevate-freely-easily/comment-page-2/#comment-3570</link>
		<dc:creator>Tutto quello che c&#8217;è da sapere su Windows 7 &#171; Guiodic Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-let-malware-elevate-freely-easily/#comment-3570</guid>
		<description>[...] In realtà non c&#8217;è bisogno che il programma venga direttamente infettato. E&#8217; possibile realizzare semplicemente un malware che esegue uno di questi programmi e assume i privilegi di amministratore [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In realtà non c&#8217;è bisogno che il programma venga direttamente infettato. E&#8217; possibile realizzare semplicemente un malware che esegue uno di questi programmi e assume i privilegi di amministratore [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Software Source Update &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Windows 7 silently elevates malware access</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-lets-malware-elevate-freely-easily/comment-page-2/#comment-3560</link>
		<dc:creator>Software Source Update &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Windows 7 silently elevates malware access</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-let-malware-elevate-freely-easily/#comment-3560</guid>
		<description>[...] Rafael Rivera Jr. has released proof-of-concept code that demonstrates how unauthorized third-party software can elevate its privileges and install [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rafael Rivera Jr. has released proof-of-concept code that demonstrates how unauthorized third-party software can elevate its privileges and install [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-lets-malware-elevate-freely-easily/comment-page-2/#comment-2583</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-let-malware-elevate-freely-easily/#comment-2583</guid>
		<description>This is one of the strangest proof of concept flaws I&#039;ve ever seen. I totally understand how injecting a dll into a white listed app could exploit this. Would it not be better for the functions requiring admin privilledges to check if the invoker is white listed and if not, then prompt? That seems like an easier option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the strangest proof of concept flaws I&#8217;ve ever seen. I totally understand how injecting a dll into a white listed app could exploit this. Would it not be better for the functions requiring admin privilledges to check if the invoker is white listed and if not, then prompt? That seems like an easier option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: List of Windows 7 (beta build 7000) auto-elevated binaries - 【windows7 Home】</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-lets-malware-elevate-freely-easily/comment-page-2/#comment-2574</link>
		<dc:creator>List of Windows 7 (beta build 7000) auto-elevated binaries - 【windows7 Home】</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-let-malware-elevate-freely-easily/#comment-2574</guid>
		<description>[...] my last post regarding Windows 7’s new “auto-elevate” flag (and potential issues with such a system), I mentioned compiling a list of all the flagged [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my last post regarding Windows 7’s new “auto-elevate” flag (and potential issues with such a system), I mentioned compiling a list of all the flagged [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blogger &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft changes Windows 7 UAC due to new exploit code</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-lets-malware-elevate-freely-easily/comment-page-2/#comment-2527</link>
		<dc:creator>blogger &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft changes Windows 7 UAC due to new exploit code</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-let-malware-elevate-freely-easily/#comment-2527</guid>
		<description>[...] will &#8230; automatically elevate the process to High Mandatory Level, executing your payload wearing an administrative hat,&quot; Rivera said in a post to his blog early this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will &#8230; automatically elevate the process to High Mandatory Level, executing your payload wearing an administrative hat,&quot; Rivera said in a post to his blog early this [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Second Windows 7 beta UAC security flaw: malware can silently self-elevate with default UAC policy &#124; Window7s</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-lets-malware-elevate-freely-easily/comment-page-2/#comment-2512</link>
		<dc:creator>Second Windows 7 beta UAC security flaw: malware can silently self-elevate with default UAC policy &#124; Window7s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-let-malware-elevate-freely-easily/#comment-2512</guid>
		<description>[...] Without going into too much detail, as you already may know from the previous postings, Windows 7 has the ability automatically elevates Microsoft-signed applications and code which specifies &#8220;auto elevation&#8221; to mitigate the number of UAC prompts. Rafael Rivera has more details how this works. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Without going into too much detail, as you already may know from the previous postings, Windows 7 has the ability automatically elevates Microsoft-signed applications and code which specifies &#8220;auto elevation&#8221; to mitigate the number of UAC prompts. Rafael Rivera has more details how this works. [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Second Windows 7 beta UAC security flaw: malware can silently self-elevate with default UAC policy &#171; Window7s</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-lets-malware-elevate-freely-easily/comment-page-2/#comment-2509</link>
		<dc:creator>Second Windows 7 beta UAC security flaw: malware can silently self-elevate with default UAC policy &#171; Window7s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-let-malware-elevate-freely-easily/#comment-2509</guid>
		<description>[...] Without going into too much detail, as you already may know from the previous postings, Windows 7 has the ability automatically elevates Microsoft-signed applications and code which specifies &#8220;auto elevation&#8221; to mitigate the number of UAC prompts. Rafael Rivera has more details how this works. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Without going into too much detail, as you already may know from the previous postings, Windows 7 has the ability automatically elevates Microsoft-signed applications and code which specifies &#8220;auto elevation&#8221; to mitigate the number of UAC prompts. Rafael Rivera has more details how this works. [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac OS X Dialog Box Spoofing—Believe Me, I’m System Preferences</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-lets-malware-elevate-freely-easily/comment-page-1/#comment-2474</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac OS X Dialog Box Spoofing—Believe Me, I’m System Preferences</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-let-malware-elevate-freely-easily/#comment-2474</guid>
		<description>[...] While analyzing the recent OSX.Iservice.B threat I noticed some interesting API calls that were dealing directly with the Mac OS X authorization mechanism. There are plenty of interesting analyses and discussion about Windows UAC, both regarding Vista (Ollie&#8217;s post) or the recent Windows 7 UAC. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] While analyzing the recent OSX.Iservice.B threat I noticed some interesting API calls that were dealing directly with the Mac OS X authorization mechanism. There are plenty of interesting analyses and discussion about Windows UAC, both regarding Vista (Ollie&rsquo;s post) or the recent Windows 7 UAC. [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft responds to UAC criticism in Windows 7 and fixes design flaws &#124; IT Knowledge Hub</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-lets-malware-elevate-freely-easily/comment-page-1/#comment-2470</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft responds to UAC criticism in Windows 7 and fixes design flaws &#124; IT Knowledge Hub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-let-malware-elevate-freely-easily/#comment-2470</guid>
		<description>[...] in Windows 7 RC, you will always be prompted when the UAC level is changed to prevent any malicious scripts from silently changing your UAC level and taking over your computer. For everybody using Windows 7 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in Windows 7 RC, you will always be prompted when the UAC level is changed to prevent any malicious scripts from silently changing your UAC level and taking over your computer. For everybody using Windows 7 [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft responds to UAC criticism in Windows 7 and fixes design flaws &#124; Windows 7 Center</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-lets-malware-elevate-freely-easily/comment-page-1/#comment-2461</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft responds to UAC criticism in Windows 7 and fixes design flaws &#124; Windows 7 Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-let-malware-elevate-freely-easily/#comment-2461</guid>
		<description>[...] in Windows 7 RC, you will always be prompted when the UAC level is changed to prevent any malicious scripts from silently changing your UAC level and taking over your computer. It&#8217;s a good sign that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in Windows 7 RC, you will always be prompted when the UAC level is changed to prevent any malicious scripts from silently changing your UAC level and taking over your computer. It&#8217;s a good sign that [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4sysops - Windows 7 UAC vulnerabilities</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-lets-malware-elevate-freely-easily/comment-page-1/#comment-2456</link>
		<dc:creator>4sysops - Windows 7 UAC vulnerabilities</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-let-malware-elevate-freely-easily/#comment-2456</guid>
		<description>[...] Rafael Rivera again wrote a proof-of-concept. He uses a proxy application, which he called Catapult.exe, that launches Cake.dll. With the default UAC setting, Windows will run Cake.dll with admin privileges without issuing a prompt. You can verify that if you set the UAC setting to &#8220;Always notify me&#8221;. If you start Catapult.exe with this configuration, you will get a UAC prompt. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rafael Rivera again wrote a proof-of-concept. He uses a proxy application, which he called Catapult.exe, that launches Cake.dll. With the default UAC setting, Windows will run Cake.dll with admin privileges without issuing a prompt. You can verify that if you set the UAC setting to &#8220;Always notify me&#8221;. If you start Catapult.exe with this configuration, you will get a UAC prompt. [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Il web cambia la decisione di Microsoft sull&#8217;UAC di Windows 7 &#124; Windows 7 Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-lets-malware-elevate-freely-easily/comment-page-1/#comment-2455</link>
		<dc:creator>Il web cambia la decisione di Microsoft sull&#8217;UAC di Windows 7 &#124; Windows 7 Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-let-malware-elevate-freely-easily/#comment-2455</guid>
		<description>[...] sul lavoro di Rafael Rivera Long Zheng ha dimostrato che la combinazione di elevation automatica di software [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sul lavoro di Rafael Rivera Long Zheng ha dimostrato che la combinazione di elevation automatica di software [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Latest Second Windows 7 beta UAC security flaw: malware can silently self-elevate with default UAC policy &#124; Gadget on Gatzet Info</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-lets-malware-elevate-freely-easily/comment-page-1/#comment-2442</link>
		<dc:creator>Latest Second Windows 7 beta UAC security flaw: malware can silently self-elevate with default UAC policy &#124; Gadget on Gatzet Info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-let-malware-elevate-freely-easily/#comment-2442</guid>
		<description>[...] Without going into too much detail, as you already may know from the previous postings, Windows 7 has the ability automatically elevates Microsoft-signed applications and code which specifies “auto elevation” to mitigate the number of UAC prompts. Rafael Rivera has more details how this works. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Without going into too much detail, as you already may know from the previous postings, Windows 7 has the ability automatically elevates Microsoft-signed applications and code which specifies “auto elevation” to mitigate the number of UAC prompts. Rafael Rivera has more details how this works. [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xtreem0</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-lets-malware-elevate-freely-easily/comment-page-1/#comment-2437</link>
		<dc:creator>Xtreem0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-let-malware-elevate-freely-easily/#comment-2437</guid>
		<description>http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1914 there is an update where apparently they say they have fixed it. Mined you we may not see the fix untill final releace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1914" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1914</a> there is an update where apparently they say they have fixed it. Mined you we may not see the fix untill final releace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UAC in Windows 7 is like a screen door on a submarine &#124; OS Attack</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-lets-malware-elevate-freely-easily/comment-page-1/#comment-2433</link>
		<dc:creator>UAC in Windows 7 is like a screen door on a submarine &#124; OS Attack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-let-malware-elevate-freely-easily/#comment-2433</guid>
		<description>[...] posting their original findings Rafael Ravera has posted a follow up on his site showing how malware could use rundll32.exe or any other [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posting their original findings Rafael Ravera has posted a follow up on his site showing how malware could use rundll32.exe or any other [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boycott Novell &#187; Turkey, France, United Stated Under Attack by Microsoft Windows Insecurities</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-lets-malware-elevate-freely-easily/comment-page-1/#comment-2431</link>
		<dc:creator>Boycott Novell &#187; Turkey, France, United Stated Under Attack by Microsoft Windows Insecurities</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-let-malware-elevate-freely-easily/#comment-2431</guid>
		<description>[...] status (beta) that wrongly indicates maturity, the operating system is not secure and it keeps looking worse as people study it more closely.  As you probably know by now, Windows 7 introduces some new in-between modes for User Account [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] status (beta) that wrongly indicates maturity, the operating system is not secure and it keeps looking worse as people study it more closely.  As you probably know by now, Windows 7 introduces some new in-between modes for User Account [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Microsoft: UAC security setting not changing (for now) &#124; All about Microsoft &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-lets-malware-elevate-freely-easily/comment-page-1/#comment-2428</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Microsoft: UAC security setting not changing (for now) &#124; All about Microsoft &#124; ZDNet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-let-malware-elevate-freely-easily/#comment-2428</guid>
		<description>[...] the entire UAC security-setting controversy, I&#8217;ll just point to a few posts about it from Within Windows, Istartedsomething, and yours truly. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the entire UAC security-setting controversy, I&#8217;ll just point to a few posts about it from Within Windows, Istartedsomething, and yours truly. [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicky</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-lets-malware-elevate-freely-easily/comment-page-1/#comment-2427</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-let-malware-elevate-freely-easily/#comment-2427</guid>
		<description>Although I&#039;m currently at work and havent yet tried hack created by the author, I will try it when I get home and post my results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I&#8217;m currently at work and havent yet tried hack created by the author, I will try it when I get home and post my results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicky</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-lets-malware-elevate-freely-easily/comment-page-1/#comment-2426</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-let-malware-elevate-freely-easily/#comment-2426</guid>
		<description>If explorer will allow anyone to take advantage of elevated privilages, then what is the solution, to what I see as the most ridiculous security flaw ever? I was under the impression that Windows 7 was supposed to be supiriour to Vista in every sense. I have been running build 7000 for about a week and I&#039;m very happy with it so far but if I have to get annoying confirm boxes every 30 seconds just to have a secure OS then I&#039;ll probably start looking elsewhere for a new OS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If explorer will allow anyone to take advantage of elevated privilages, then what is the solution, to what I see as the most ridiculous security flaw ever? I was under the impression that Windows 7 was supposed to be supiriour to Vista in every sense. I have been running build 7000 for about a week and I&#8217;m very happy with it so far but if I have to get annoying confirm boxes every 30 seconds just to have a secure OS then I&#8217;ll probably start looking elsewhere for a new OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asf</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-lets-malware-elevate-freely-easily/comment-page-1/#comment-2423</link>
		<dc:creator>asf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-let-malware-elevate-freely-easily/#comment-2423</guid>
		<description>@Dan: I was not sure if cmd.exe could be auto elevated. The point still stands, if explorer gives you full control, you can replace a dll that implements some shell extension with your own evil dll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dan: I was not sure if cmd.exe could be auto elevated. The point still stands, if explorer gives you full control, you can replace a dll that implements some shell extension with your own evil dll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Win 7 fan</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-lets-malware-elevate-freely-easily/comment-page-1/#comment-2421</link>
		<dc:creator>Win 7 fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-let-malware-elevate-freely-easily/#comment-2421</guid>
		<description>It does not work 4 me. I am running win 7 built 7000</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does not work 4 me. I am running win 7 built 7000</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-lets-malware-elevate-freely-easily/comment-page-1/#comment-2417</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/02/04/windows-7-auto-elevation-mistake-let-malware-elevate-freely-easily/#comment-2417</guid>
		<description>@Dan: I know Exploder doesn&#039;t run elevated. It doesn&#039;t have to. It, or anything running inside of it, can *silently* elevate other code.

That&#039;s the whole problem. (And it&#039;s not just limited to Explorer.exe; I&#039;m just using that as a well-known example other than RunDll32.exe.)

In the past elevated processes could create other elevated processes. That isn&#039;t an issue because there&#039;s nothing you can&#039;t do in the original process that you can do in the ones it can spawn. If you&#039;ve taken control of an elevated process you don&#039;t need to spawn another one; you can do whatever you want in the process you already have.

Now, by default in Win7 beta, there are non-elevated processes like Explorer.exe which can create elevated processes without prompting. And since Explorer.exe (etc.) are non-elevated, *all* *other* non-elevated processes can take control of them and in turn elevate anything they want without prompting.

In other words, a non-elevated process which is not whitelisted for silent elevation can elevate things silently with very little effort. That&#039;s the problem!

It&#039;s getting frustrating explaining this again and again. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dan: I know Exploder doesn&#8217;t run elevated. It doesn&#8217;t have to. It, or anything running inside of it, can *silently* elevate other code.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the whole problem. (And it&#8217;s not just limited to Explorer.exe; I&#8217;m just using that as a well-known example other than RunDll32.exe.)</p>
<p>In the past elevated processes could create other elevated processes. That isn&#8217;t an issue because there&#8217;s nothing you can&#8217;t do in the original process that you can do in the ones it can spawn. If you&#8217;ve taken control of an elevated process you don&#8217;t need to spawn another one; you can do whatever you want in the process you already have.</p>
<p>Now, by default in Win7 beta, there are non-elevated processes like Explorer.exe which can create elevated processes without prompting. And since Explorer.exe (etc.) are non-elevated, *all* *other* non-elevated processes can take control of them and in turn elevate anything they want without prompting.</p>
<p>In other words, a non-elevated process which is not whitelisted for silent elevation can elevate things silently with very little effort. That&#8217;s the problem!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s getting frustrating explaining this again and again. :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
