<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Malware can turn off UAC in Windows 7; &#8220;By design&#8221; says Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/01/30/malware-can-turn-off-uac-in-windows-7-by-design-says-microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/01/30/malware-can-turn-off-uac-in-windows-7-by-design-says-microsoft/</link>
	<description>Not your usual Microsoft enthusiast blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:11:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sonic</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/01/30/malware-can-turn-off-uac-in-windows-7-by-design-says-microsoft/comment-page-3/#comment-4904</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=531#comment-4904</guid>
		<description>Looks like this issue has been fixed in Windows 7 RTM. I&#039;m running Windows 7 Home Premium since October 22, 2009.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like this issue has been fixed in Windows 7 RTM. I&#8217;m running Windows 7 Home Premium since October 22, 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Somebody</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/01/30/malware-can-turn-off-uac-in-windows-7-by-design-says-microsoft/comment-page-3/#comment-4311</link>
		<dc:creator>Somebody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=531#comment-4311</guid>
		<description>seems like UIPI prevents the sendkeys, or other equivalents</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seems like UIPI prevents the sendkeys, or other equivalents</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Somebody</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/01/30/malware-can-turn-off-uac-in-windows-7-by-design-says-microsoft/comment-page-3/#comment-4309</link>
		<dc:creator>Somebody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=531#comment-4309</guid>
		<description>The UAC Settings page does not accept the sendkeys input</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UAC Settings page does not accept the sendkeys input</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Windows 7 UAC &#8212; Door is Wide Open</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/01/30/malware-can-turn-off-uac-in-windows-7-by-design-says-microsoft/comment-page-2/#comment-4138</link>
		<dc:creator>matt&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Windows 7 UAC &#8212; Door is Wide Open</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=531#comment-4138</guid>
		<description>[...] some folks did just that.  They created a simple VB script to stand in place of the user and &#8220;press&#8221; the right [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] some folks did just that.  They created a simple VB script to stand in place of the user and &#8220;press&#8221; the right [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Филипп Смирнов</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/01/30/malware-can-turn-off-uac-in-windows-7-by-design-says-microsoft/comment-page-2/#comment-3811</link>
		<dc:creator>Филипп Смирнов</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=531#comment-3811</guid>
		<description>{Читаю {ваш&#124;этот&#124;} блог, и понимаю, что {ничего&#124;нифига} не понимаю. Все так запутано. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>{Читаю {ваш|этот|} блог, и понимаю, что {ничего|нифига} не понимаю. Все так запутано. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: At least 62 gaping security holes in Windows 7 Release Candidate &#171; Reformed Musings</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/01/30/malware-can-turn-off-uac-in-windows-7-by-design-says-microsoft/comment-page-2/#comment-3663</link>
		<dc:creator>At least 62 gaping security holes in Windows 7 Release Candidate &#171; Reformed Musings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=531#comment-3663</guid>
		<description>[...] According to Rafael at Within Windows, Microsoft claims that all this is by design. Rafael makes the same recommendation as Leo: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] According to Rafael at Within Windows, Microsoft claims that all this is by design. Rafael makes the same recommendation as Leo: [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karun AB &#187; Windows 7: A second look</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/01/30/malware-can-turn-off-uac-in-windows-7-by-design-says-microsoft/comment-page-2/#comment-3614</link>
		<dc:creator>Karun AB &#187; Windows 7: A second look</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=531#comment-3614</guid>
		<description>[...] were raised by certain tech users made popular by Long Zheng and Rafael Rivera in posts such as Malware can turn off UAC in Windows 7; “By design” says Microsoft. Clearly, Microsoft needs to move back to Secure Desktop for changes to UAC. We don’t mind UAC [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] were raised by certain tech users made popular by Long Zheng and Rafael Rivera in posts such as Malware can turn off UAC in Windows 7; “By design” says Microsoft. Clearly, Microsoft needs to move back to Secure Desktop for changes to UAC. We don’t mind UAC [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Черноморец</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/01/30/malware-can-turn-off-uac-in-windows-7-by-design-says-microsoft/comment-page-2/#comment-3421</link>
		<dc:creator>Черноморец</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=531#comment-3421</guid>
		<description>Извините, как можно добавить свой материал на сайт?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Извините, как можно добавить свой материал на сайт?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darryl</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/01/30/malware-can-turn-off-uac-in-windows-7-by-design-says-microsoft/comment-page-2/#comment-3197</link>
		<dc:creator>Darryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=531#comment-3197</guid>
		<description>I recall Mark Minasi commenting that if compatibility is 9-o-clock and security is 3-o-clock, MS set it to about 10-o-clock with Vista&#039;s UAC and integrity levels and so on. Me? I&#039;d have slammed that sucker all the way over to 2-o-clock as a minimum!

It isn&#039;t that it&#039;s annoying or any kind of a problem after you do initial setup and it&#039;s much better than using XP with Limited User Access, though I implemented that enterprise-wide a few years back. Even then (with XP) I never reinstalled anything from scratch but used a fully-configured image backup if I had to flatten the machine and rebuild it.

The real issue is &quot;drive-by&quot; web sites...a few times, not often in the last 2.5 years I&#039;ve been running Vista, but a few times I&#039;ve been Googling things and researching and...Whoa!...what&#039;s this? A UAC prompt? Deny!!! Normally I &#039;right-click&#039; on multiple topics in my Google searches and select &#039;Open in New Tab&#039; before I start reading on topic.

Best illustration I&#039;ve heard for UAC I&#039;ve heard: when you&#039;re done with your car, you have to take the key-fob and press the lock button...the car doesn&#039;t &#039;just know&#039; that you&#039;re done with it when you get out and walk away. Similarly, you have to press the unlock button because the car also doesn&#039;t &#039;just know&#039; that you are the right person to allow to drive it/get inside it.

I welcome UAC and wish they&#039;d made secure &#039;stiffer&#039; - even as an option. When I upgrade to Windows 7 I will most definitely set UAC to behave as in Vista. If I can&#039;t do that...I won&#039;t change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recall Mark Minasi commenting that if compatibility is 9-o-clock and security is 3-o-clock, MS set it to about 10-o-clock with Vista&#8217;s UAC and integrity levels and so on. Me? I&#8217;d have slammed that sucker all the way over to 2-o-clock as a minimum!</p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t that it&#8217;s annoying or any kind of a problem after you do initial setup and it&#8217;s much better than using XP with Limited User Access, though I implemented that enterprise-wide a few years back. Even then (with XP) I never reinstalled anything from scratch but used a fully-configured image backup if I had to flatten the machine and rebuild it.</p>
<p>The real issue is &#8220;drive-by&#8221; web sites&#8230;a few times, not often in the last 2.5 years I&#8217;ve been running Vista, but a few times I&#8217;ve been Googling things and researching and&#8230;Whoa!&#8230;what&#8217;s this? A UAC prompt? Deny!!! Normally I &#8216;right-click&#8217; on multiple topics in my Google searches and select &#8216;Open in New Tab&#8217; before I start reading on topic.</p>
<p>Best illustration I&#8217;ve heard for UAC I&#8217;ve heard: when you&#8217;re done with your car, you have to take the key-fob and press the lock button&#8230;the car doesn&#8217;t &#8216;just know&#8217; that you&#8217;re done with it when you get out and walk away. Similarly, you have to press the unlock button because the car also doesn&#8217;t &#8216;just know&#8217; that you are the right person to allow to drive it/get inside it.</p>
<p>I welcome UAC and wish they&#8217;d made secure &#8217;stiffer&#8217; &#8211; even as an option. When I upgrade to Windows 7 I will most definitely set UAC to behave as in Vista. If I can&#8217;t do that&#8230;I won&#8217;t change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Personal Blog — John Keyes &#8211; Linkeyes 1st February 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/01/30/malware-can-turn-off-uac-in-windows-7-by-design-says-microsoft/comment-page-2/#comment-3176</link>
		<dc:creator>Personal Blog — John Keyes &#8211; Linkeyes 1st February 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=531#comment-3176</guid>
		<description>[...] up as a mirror when the display is off. Loads of people hate Vista&#8217;s UAC, but in Windows 7 UAC can be turned off by malware and it&#8217;s &#8216;by-design&#8217;! An amazing story by Jeffrey Zeldman on his family roots. One of the worst escape attempts ever? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] up as a mirror when the display is off. Loads of people hate Vista&#8217;s UAC, but in Windows 7 UAC can be turned off by malware and it&#8217;s &#8216;by-design&#8217;! An amazing story by Jeffrey Zeldman on his family roots. One of the worst escape attempts ever? [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malware puede modificar la UAC &#171; Windows 7 Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/01/30/malware-can-turn-off-uac-in-windows-7-by-design-says-microsoft/comment-page-2/#comment-2808</link>
		<dc:creator>Malware puede modificar la UAC &#171; Windows 7 Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=531#comment-2808</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/01/30/malware-can-turn-off-uac-in-windows-7-by-design-says-microso...   Escrito en Bug, Microsoft, UAC, Windowss 7 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/01/30/malware-can-turn-off-uac-in-windows-7-by-design-says-microso.." rel="nofollow">http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/01/30/malware-can-turn-off-uac-in-windows-7-by-design-says-microso..</a>.   Escrito en Bug, Microsoft, UAC, Windowss 7 [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft comenta mudanças presentes no Windows 7 RC &#171; Live DeskMod&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/01/30/malware-can-turn-off-uac-in-windows-7-by-design-says-microsoft/comment-page-2/#comment-2710</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft comenta mudanças presentes no Windows 7 RC &#171; Live DeskMod&#8217;s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=531#comment-2710</guid>
		<description>[...] Só que nem tudo são rosas, e tem muito beta tester oficial irritado com o tratamento que a Microsoft está dando ao programa. A principal queixa é em relação à pouca informação que Redmond libera acerca do que está sendo feito no novo Windows. Ao invés de ser uma via de duas mãos, o programa beta está parecendo uma de mão única, na qual apenas os beta testers relatam bugs e problemas, mas não recebem respostas claras sobre o que a Microsoft pretende fazer ou fez em relação a eles. O caso-símbolo dessa celeuma é, sem dúvida, o imbróglio em que se envolveram Long Zheng e Rafael Rivera, por conta de uma falha no UAC. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Só que nem tudo são rosas, e tem muito beta tester oficial irritado com o tratamento que a Microsoft está dando ao programa. A principal queixa é em relação à pouca informação que Redmond libera acerca do que está sendo feito no novo Windows. Ao invés de ser uma via de duas mãos, o programa beta está parecendo uma de mão única, na qual apenas os beta testers relatam bugs e problemas, mas não recebem respostas claras sobre o que a Microsoft pretende fazer ou fez em relação a eles. O caso-símbolo dessa celeuma é, sem dúvida, o imbróglio em que se envolveram Long Zheng e Rafael Rivera, por conta de uma falha no UAC. [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliven</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/01/30/malware-can-turn-off-uac-in-windows-7-by-design-says-microsoft/comment-page-2/#comment-2550</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=531#comment-2550</guid>
		<description>The UAC is great for the fact that it prevents idiots from doing bad things to their machines, but it delays far too many normal operations, and a scale-back for those of use who know how to manage our systems is welcome, in my book.  I don&#039;t need to be hand-held through my job, especially when it costs me time and causes me aggravation.  That modifying the UAC does not *itself* prompt you is a very, very bad idea, however:   this security chasm should be reviewed and revised. 

Forcing users to remember the Admin acct user pw but making the default acct be of limited access might go a long way towards fixing the root cause of the need for the UAC, but users would doubtless lock themselves out en masse.  Sigh.

@ MagicAndre1981

I&#039;m not sure what you are using for comparison, but I have observed that Vista boxes tend to stutter and hang until I shut off nearly every one of the OS&#039;s shiny new features, even when the units have 4G of RAM.   I have been told that Vista 32 is faster than Vista 64, which makes sense, but the pretty much uniformly lower speed on Vista boxes I have observed, compared to XP boxes with far older/lower capacity hardware , is striking.  

@ Israel Lopez  

That the UAC prompts repeatedly without offering an &quot;do not prompt again&quot; checkbox is, as Dutch said, an annoyance.  No amount of rationalization is going to change the fact that an Admin user should not have to &quot;plant the flag&quot; repeatedly for the same app.  Period.  Try working in a production environment where you are constantly making system changes and having to deal with the UAC repeatedly: it sucks.  Mac OS has this repetitive prompt (with a password requirement and *occasional* case-sensitivity on the *user name*, to boot!) and it is one of the many reasons that I will not buy a Mac, despite having been an Apple Certified Desktop Technician.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UAC is great for the fact that it prevents idiots from doing bad things to their machines, but it delays far too many normal operations, and a scale-back for those of use who know how to manage our systems is welcome, in my book.  I don&#8217;t need to be hand-held through my job, especially when it costs me time and causes me aggravation.  That modifying the UAC does not *itself* prompt you is a very, very bad idea, however:   this security chasm should be reviewed and revised. </p>
<p>Forcing users to remember the Admin acct user pw but making the default acct be of limited access might go a long way towards fixing the root cause of the need for the UAC, but users would doubtless lock themselves out en masse.  Sigh.</p>
<p>@ MagicAndre1981</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what you are using for comparison, but I have observed that Vista boxes tend to stutter and hang until I shut off nearly every one of the OS&#8217;s shiny new features, even when the units have 4G of RAM.   I have been told that Vista 32 is faster than Vista 64, which makes sense, but the pretty much uniformly lower speed on Vista boxes I have observed, compared to XP boxes with far older/lower capacity hardware , is striking.  </p>
<p>@ Israel Lopez  </p>
<p>That the UAC prompts repeatedly without offering an &#8220;do not prompt again&#8221; checkbox is, as Dutch said, an annoyance.  No amount of rationalization is going to change the fact that an Admin user should not have to &#8220;plant the flag&#8221; repeatedly for the same app.  Period.  Try working in a production environment where you are constantly making system changes and having to deal with the UAC repeatedly: it sucks.  Mac OS has this repetitive prompt (with a password requirement and *occasional* case-sensitivity on the *user name*, to boot!) and it is one of the many reasons that I will not buy a Mac, despite having been an Apple Certified Desktop Technician.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft comenta mudanças presentes no Windows 7 RC &#8212; WinAjuda &#8212; Diga adeus à sua tecla F1</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/01/30/malware-can-turn-off-uac-in-windows-7-by-design-says-microsoft/comment-page-2/#comment-2544</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft comenta mudanças presentes no Windows 7 RC &#8212; WinAjuda &#8212; Diga adeus à sua tecla F1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=531#comment-2544</guid>
		<description>[...] Só que nem tudo são rosas, e tem muito beta tester oficial irritado com o tratamento que a Microsoft está dando ao programa. A principal queixa é em relação à pouca informação que Redmond libera acerca do que está sendo feito no novo Windows. Ao invés de ser uma via de duas mãos, o programa beta está parecendo uma de mão única, na qual apenas os beta testers relatam bugs e problemas, mas não recebem respostas claras sobre o que a Microsoft pretende fazer ou fez em relação a eles. O caso-símbolo dessa celeuma é, sem dúvida, o imbróglio em que se envolveram Long Zheng e Rafael Rivera, por conta de uma falha no UAC. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Só que nem tudo são rosas, e tem muito beta tester oficial irritado com o tratamento que a Microsoft está dando ao programa. A principal queixa é em relação à pouca informação que Redmond libera acerca do que está sendo feito no novo Windows. Ao invés de ser uma via de duas mãos, o programa beta está parecendo uma de mão única, na qual apenas os beta testers relatam bugs e problemas, mas não recebem respostas claras sobre o que a Microsoft pretende fazer ou fez em relação a eles. O caso-símbolo dessa celeuma é, sem dúvida, o imbróglio em que se envolveram Long Zheng e Rafael Rivera, por conta de uma falha no UAC. [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sacrificing security for usability: UAC security flaw in Windows 7 beta (with proof of concept code) &#124; Window7s</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/01/30/malware-can-turn-off-uac-in-windows-7-by-design-says-microsoft/comment-page-2/#comment-2510</link>
		<dc:creator>Sacrificing security for usability: UAC security flaw in Windows 7 beta (with proof of concept code) &#124; Window7s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=531#comment-2510</guid>
		<description>[...] be just as easy in C++ EXE) to do that - emulate a few keyboard inputs - without prompting UAC. You can download and try it out for yourself here, but bear in mind it actually does disable [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be just as easy in C++ EXE) to do that &#8211; emulate a few keyboard inputs &#8211; without prompting UAC. You can download and try it out for yourself here, but bear in mind it actually does disable [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sacrificing security for usability: UAC security flaw in Windows 7 beta (with proof of concept code) &#171; Window7s</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/01/30/malware-can-turn-off-uac-in-windows-7-by-design-says-microsoft/comment-page-2/#comment-2508</link>
		<dc:creator>Sacrificing security for usability: UAC security flaw in Windows 7 beta (with proof of concept code) &#171; Window7s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=531#comment-2508</guid>
		<description>[...] be just as easy in C++ EXE) to do that - emulate a few keyboard inputs - without prompting UAC. You can download and try it out for yourself here, but bear in mind it actually does disable [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be just as easy in C++ EXE) to do that &#8211; emulate a few keyboard inputs &#8211; without prompting UAC. You can download and try it out for yourself here, but bear in mind it actually does disable [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel.Jozsef</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/01/30/malware-can-turn-off-uac-in-windows-7-by-design-says-microsoft/comment-page-2/#comment-2488</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel.Jozsef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=531#comment-2488</guid>
		<description>Now-now, what&#039;s this talk about &quot;less secure&quot;?!
If we&#039;re talking about security as a trait inherent to the OS, the UAC has nothing to do with it. Security in this case depends on how easy it is to defeat policies set by the administrator, like steal or damage data from a restricted account or without access to an account whatsoever. Administrator is absolute. That&#039;s the way it was through all the years of multi-user computing.
If Microsoft wants to help the world of computing by reducing the &quot;human factor&quot;, I think a two-login model for new installations would be far more appropriate: az administrator user for installing software and changing system-wide settings, and a RESTRICTED user for everything else - work, surfing the web, games, etc.
That&#039;s the way I&#039;m using my Windows XP account, without any antivirus software, and yet I haven&#039;t had ANY malware or virus problems, EVER.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now-now, what&#8217;s this talk about &#8220;less secure&#8221;?!<br />
If we&#8217;re talking about security as a trait inherent to the OS, the UAC has nothing to do with it. Security in this case depends on how easy it is to defeat policies set by the administrator, like steal or damage data from a restricted account or without access to an account whatsoever. Administrator is absolute. That&#8217;s the way it was through all the years of multi-user computing.<br />
If Microsoft wants to help the world of computing by reducing the &#8220;human factor&#8221;, I think a two-login model for new installations would be far more appropriate: az administrator user for installing software and changing system-wide settings, and a RESTRICTED user for everything else &#8211; work, surfing the web, games, etc.<br />
That&#8217;s the way I&#8217;m using my Windows XP account, without any antivirus software, and yet I haven&#8217;t had ANY malware or virus problems, EVER.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Israel Lopez</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/01/30/malware-can-turn-off-uac-in-windows-7-by-design-says-microsoft/comment-page-2/#comment-2477</link>
		<dc:creator>Israel Lopez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=531#comment-2477</guid>
		<description>Dutch, the problem is if you authorize something once, the next time maybe it could be adware or malware trying to get something done, so since there is the possibility you authorized something once, but in an hour from now someone else might be on your computer or malware might be trying to install, you have to confirm once again.

I think the easy fix is for Microsoft to request Admin rights ALWAYS, even if you have UAC turned off, in order to change the UAC security level and settings. As long as the highest security mode does not ask you to confirm things twice like Vista did sometimes, it is all fine. Windows Vista&#039;s UAC didn&#039;t annoy me much, what annoyed me was having to click first on one pop up and then another one to confirm... Seven doesn&#039;t have this duplicate popup issue. All they need is to lock UAC settings from being modified always.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dutch, the problem is if you authorize something once, the next time maybe it could be adware or malware trying to get something done, so since there is the possibility you authorized something once, but in an hour from now someone else might be on your computer or malware might be trying to install, you have to confirm once again.</p>
<p>I think the easy fix is for Microsoft to request Admin rights ALWAYS, even if you have UAC turned off, in order to change the UAC security level and settings. As long as the highest security mode does not ask you to confirm things twice like Vista did sometimes, it is all fine. Windows Vista&#8217;s UAC didn&#8217;t annoy me much, what annoyed me was having to click first on one pop up and then another one to confirm&#8230; Seven doesn&#8217;t have this duplicate popup issue. All they need is to lock UAC settings from being modified always.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobbis Blog &#187; UAC unter Windows 7 deaktivieren</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/01/30/malware-can-turn-off-uac-in-windows-7-by-design-says-microsoft/comment-page-2/#comment-2476</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobbis Blog &#187; UAC unter Windows 7 deaktivieren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=531#comment-2476</guid>
		<description>[...] eben jenem System durch Sicherheitsl&#252;cken eher negativ&#160; aufgefallen. Demonstriert von Rafael Rivera und Long Zheng in einem Proof-Of-Concept. Microsoft will sich der Sache annehmen und verspricht, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] eben jenem System durch Sicherheitsl&#252;cken eher negativ&#160; aufgefallen. Demonstriert von Rafael Rivera und Long Zheng in einem Proof-Of-Concept. Microsoft will sich der Sache annehmen und verspricht, [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft soluciona el problema de seguridad del UAC en Windows 7 &#171; Miguelthepooh&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/01/30/malware-can-turn-off-uac-in-windows-7-by-design-says-microsoft/comment-page-2/#comment-2468</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft soluciona el problema de seguridad del UAC en Windows 7 &#171; Miguelthepooh&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=531#comment-2468</guid>
		<description>[...] Con el tiempo, Microsoft empieza a dar señas cada vez más claras de que “ya no son los mismos de antes”. Dentro de esas señas esta el escuchar el feedback de los usuarios y actuar diligentemente frente a vulnerabilidades de seguridad. Decimos esto porque, después de Redmond afirmara que aquella grave vulnerabilidad del UAC de Windows 7 no iba a ser reparada porque era algo hecho así a propósito, han dado un paso atrás para anunciar que el problema ha sido solucionado en la Release Candidate de Win7 (respondiendo a la petición/denuncia de Long Zheng y Rafael Rivera). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Con el tiempo, Microsoft empieza a dar señas cada vez más claras de que “ya no son los mismos de antes”. Dentro de esas señas esta el escuchar el feedback de los usuarios y actuar diligentemente frente a vulnerabilidades de seguridad. Decimos esto porque, después de Redmond afirmara que aquella grave vulnerabilidad del UAC de Windows 7 no iba a ser reparada porque era algo hecho así a propósito, han dado un paso atrás para anunciar que el problema ha sido solucionado en la Release Candidate de Win7 (respondiendo a la petición/denuncia de Long Zheng y Rafael Rivera). [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dutch</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/01/30/malware-can-turn-off-uac-in-windows-7-by-design-says-microsoft/comment-page-2/#comment-2467</link>
		<dc:creator>Dutch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=531#comment-2467</guid>
		<description>Often the cure is worse than the disease.

I have turned UAC off mainly because it continued to ask permission for same action I was repeating over and over, as an Admin, during configuration and installation of software within the same login session. In addition, some processes running through DCOM using a &quot;secure&quot; non-interactive user were not working if I had UAC on. I do admit that a different software design -based on what XP&#039;s security permitted, over which I have obviously no control- and some extra configuration on Vista would have helped the latter, it was the constant UAC prompts that finally made me decide to turn it off.

If UAC does protect my computer (according to MS it does) why should it continue to bother me (Administrator, not a user with Admin priviliges) on the same issue over and over again. If it was a &#039;Allow&#039; the first time why wouldn&#039;t it be a &#039;Cancel&#039; next time. Maybe a checkbox with &quot;Don&#039;t ask me again&quot; would have solved the problem with very little effort. The actual solution in W7 looks more an overshoot to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Often the cure is worse than the disease.</p>
<p>I have turned UAC off mainly because it continued to ask permission for same action I was repeating over and over, as an Admin, during configuration and installation of software within the same login session. In addition, some processes running through DCOM using a &#8220;secure&#8221; non-interactive user were not working if I had UAC on. I do admit that a different software design -based on what XP&#8217;s security permitted, over which I have obviously no control- and some extra configuration on Vista would have helped the latter, it was the constant UAC prompts that finally made me decide to turn it off.</p>
<p>If UAC does protect my computer (according to MS it does) why should it continue to bother me (Administrator, not a user with Admin priviliges) on the same issue over and over again. If it was a &#8216;Allow&#8217; the first time why wouldn&#8217;t it be a &#8216;Cancel&#8217; next time. Maybe a checkbox with &#8220;Don&#8217;t ask me again&#8221; would have solved the problem with very little effort. The actual solution in W7 looks more an overshoot to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows 7: die neue Benutzerkontensteuerung &#124; Windows Vista Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/01/30/malware-can-turn-off-uac-in-windows-7-by-design-says-microsoft/comment-page-2/#comment-2464</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows 7: die neue Benutzerkontensteuerung &#124; Windows Vista Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=531#comment-2464</guid>
		<description>[...] j&#252;ngster Zeit ist die Benutzerkontosteuerung von Windows 7 (Beta) auch wieder in die Kritik geraten. Diesmal aber nicht auf Grund des Nervfaktors, sondern weil diese in der [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] j&#252;ngster Zeit ist die Benutzerkontosteuerung von Windows 7 (Beta) auch wieder in die Kritik geraten. Diesmal aber nicht auf Grund des Nervfaktors, sondern weil diese in der [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Security Summary: 09-02-2009 &#124; ContraRISK</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/01/30/malware-can-turn-off-uac-in-windows-7-by-design-says-microsoft/comment-page-2/#comment-2463</link>
		<dc:creator>Security Summary: 09-02-2009 &#124; ContraRISK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=531#comment-2463</guid>
		<description>[...] of Microsoft&#8217;s forthcoming OS, Windows 7, has a User Account Control (UAC) system that can be thwarted with a simple script, claims developer Rafael Rivera. But Microsoft insists this isn&#8217;t actually a problem because [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Microsoft&#8217;s forthcoming OS, Windows 7, has a User Account Control (UAC) system that can be thwarted with a simple script, claims developer Rafael Rivera. But Microsoft insists this isn&#8217;t actually a problem because [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Criminosos usam falsa multa em parabrisas para disseminar vírus &#171; Agência Vibe</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/01/30/malware-can-turn-off-uac-in-windows-7-by-design-says-microsoft/comment-page-2/#comment-2458</link>
		<dc:creator>Criminosos usam falsa multa em parabrisas para disseminar vírus &#171; Agência Vibe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=531#comment-2458</guid>
		<description>[...] do Wndows”, no entanto, inclui o próprio UAC. Com isso, o programador Rafael Rivera conseguiu criar um pequeno programa capaz de desativar totalmente a função de segurança sem que o usuário seja [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] do Wndows”, no entanto, inclui o próprio UAC. Com isso, o programador Rafael Rivera conseguiu criar um pequeno programa capaz de desativar totalmente a função de segurança sem que o usuário seja [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4sysops - Windows 7 UAC vulnerabilities</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/01/30/malware-can-turn-off-uac-in-windows-7-by-design-says-microsoft/comment-page-2/#comment-2457</link>
		<dc:creator>4sysops - Windows 7 UAC vulnerabilities</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=531#comment-2457</guid>
		<description>[...] party software is able to disable UAC without giving UAC the chance to prompt the user for consent. Rafael Rivera wrote a proof-of-concept VBscript program that demonstrates how malware could disable UAC. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] party software is able to disable UAC without giving UAC the chance to prompt the user for consent. Rafael Rivera wrote a proof-of-concept VBscript program that demonstrates how malware could disable UAC. [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
