<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Symantec launches new gamer&#8217;s-friendly Norton Antivirus 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/11/25/symantec-launches-new-gamerrsquos-friendly-norton-antivirus-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/11/25/symantec-launches-new-gamerrsquos-friendly-norton-antivirus-2009/</link>
	<description>Not your usual Microsoft enthusiast blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:40:37 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Immune</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/11/25/symantec-launches-new-gamerrsquos-friendly-norton-antivirus-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-3745</link>
		<dc:creator>Immune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=334#comment-3745</guid>
		<description>I have to admit, I have never been a fan of Norton since they came out with the &quot;pretty&quot; UI that began the history of bloating systems and killing bandwidth.  But with the 9 release, I have to say it is seamless with systems.  I even installed it on my 4 year old dell, thing is smooth as when I didn&#039;t even have one installed.  They have come a long way with this release.  I would go as far to say it rivals NOD32, which I am a huge fan of.
Added to that, you get 3 licenses per.  So, 3 for 1 and little footprint, I am sorry to say I am a fan at this point.  The gamer edition idea?  Who knows.  I think it is a way to get those without any AV into the symantec pocket.  But who am I to guess at it?  I am using internet security &#039;09.  

BTW, the updates are lightning fast...especially compared to &#039;08 and earlier.  A full update from install takes about 15 seconds on my system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit, I have never been a fan of Norton since they came out with the &#8220;pretty&#8221; UI that began the history of bloating systems and killing bandwidth.  But with the 9 release, I have to say it is seamless with systems.  I even installed it on my 4 year old dell, thing is smooth as when I didn&#8217;t even have one installed.  They have come a long way with this release.  I would go as far to say it rivals NOD32, which I am a huge fan of.<br />
Added to that, you get 3 licenses per.  So, 3 for 1 and little footprint, I am sorry to say I am a fan at this point.  The gamer edition idea?  Who knows.  I think it is a way to get those without any AV into the symantec pocket.  But who am I to guess at it?  I am using internet security &#8216;09.  </p>
<p>BTW, the updates are lightning fast&#8230;especially compared to &#8216;08 and earlier.  A full update from install takes about 15 seconds on my system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/11/25/symantec-launches-new-gamerrsquos-friendly-norton-antivirus-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-3086</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=334#comment-3086</guid>
		<description>I use bitdefender gamesafe, it is the best. I also found a website where you can get bitdefender gamesafe with 40% off the price. Here: http://www.bitdefendergamesafeservers.com/ . It&#039;s just 14.97$ :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use bitdefender gamesafe, it is the best. I also found a website where you can get bitdefender gamesafe with 40% off the price. Here: <a href="http://www.bitdefendergamesafeservers.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bitdefendergamesafeservers.com/</a> . It&#8217;s just 14.97$ :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/11/25/symantec-launches-new-gamerrsquos-friendly-norton-antivirus-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-2588</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=334#comment-2588</guid>
		<description>Hi there, 

I have been using Norton Anti Virus Gaming edition since shortly after it was released (when exactly I don&#039;t remember anymore, surely must have been 3 months at least). I really have to say, that I am impressed with this one. Hasent given me any problems so far, and for the time being i don&#039;t intend to changing AV&#039;s anytime soon. 

Norton youve got at least one happy customer here!

Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there, </p>
<p>I have been using Norton Anti Virus Gaming edition since shortly after it was released (when exactly I don&#8217;t remember anymore, surely must have been 3 months at least). I really have to say, that I am impressed with this one. Hasent given me any problems so far, and for the time being i don&#8217;t intend to changing AV&#8217;s anytime soon. </p>
<p>Norton youve got at least one happy customer here!</p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amal Roy</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/11/25/symantec-launches-new-gamerrsquos-friendly-norton-antivirus-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-2380</link>
		<dc:creator>Amal Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=334#comment-2380</guid>
		<description>I am now Using Norton Too. It has really improved a lot and gives good protection without slowing down the system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am now Using Norton Too. It has really improved a lot and gives good protection without slowing down the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reese</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/11/25/symantec-launches-new-gamerrsquos-friendly-norton-antivirus-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-2053</link>
		<dc:creator>Reese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=334#comment-2053</guid>
		<description>Wow. That is a rather lame advertisement. I would be interested in giving it a whirl but I will be sticking with my NOD32.

I am surprised to see the claim of NOD32 using 32MB of RAM but that is actually true with my system; 33MB actually. Still it is loaded instantly, dosen&#039;t slow the system and never interrupts me so just a few more reasons not to switch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. That is a rather lame advertisement. I would be interested in giving it a whirl but I will be sticking with my NOD32.</p>
<p>I am surprised to see the claim of NOD32 using 32MB of RAM but that is actually true with my system; 33MB actually. Still it is loaded instantly, dosen&#8217;t slow the system and never interrupts me so just a few more reasons not to switch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
