<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Vista SP2 Beta Build 16489 released to testers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/</link>
	<description>Not your usual Microsoft enthusiast blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:11:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John B. Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/comment-page-1/#comment-2231</link>
		<dc:creator>John B. Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/#comment-2231</guid>
		<description>Agree with va9rant as I have W7 Beta running better than any version of Vista and I had pre-releases of Vista and never did get drivers for my mp3 players or printers or scanners.  My Acer Aspire Vista laptop loaded with apps now takes 4:30 minutes to open i.e. [Messenger ready to use]. This time was after dropping 2 updates and keeping it clean and clear. Who wants to wait this long with a laptop and trying to close it quickly is impossible as sleep function is so faulty it almost cooked my battery.
So I am now seriously ready to go W7 with this as on my desktop it is so quick it is not an issue anymore. And W7 has drivers already which have got what I want functioning, so I  guess they did learn something the hard way as they nearly lost me.
Anybody like me from Canada with Rogers as browser as unable to use Rogers/Yahoo as not supported and they tell me to stop living on the edge and go back to W6 but Microsoft won&#039;t allow me to back as too many updates. Also W7 won&#039;t stay connected on most sites and if I use MSN or live no problem. Are they playing games with Yahoo? So I am forced to use live.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with va9rant as I have W7 Beta running better than any version of Vista and I had pre-releases of Vista and never did get drivers for my mp3 players or printers or scanners.  My Acer Aspire Vista laptop loaded with apps now takes 4:30 minutes to open i.e. [Messenger ready to use]. This time was after dropping 2 updates and keeping it clean and clear. Who wants to wait this long with a laptop and trying to close it quickly is impossible as sleep function is so faulty it almost cooked my battery.<br />
So I am now seriously ready to go W7 with this as on my desktop it is so quick it is not an issue anymore. And W7 has drivers already which have got what I want functioning, so I  guess they did learn something the hard way as they nearly lost me.<br />
Anybody like me from Canada with Rogers as browser as unable to use Rogers/Yahoo as not supported and they tell me to stop living on the edge and go back to W6 but Microsoft won&#8217;t allow me to back as too many updates. Also W7 won&#8217;t stay connected on most sites and if I use MSN or live no problem. Are they playing games with Yahoo? So I am forced to use live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: va9rant</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/comment-page-1/#comment-1768</link>
		<dc:creator>va9rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/#comment-1768</guid>
		<description>really?!  now that is something I&#039;m not happy to look forward to.  They should just cancel the release of SP2 update and offer Windows 7 as a free upgrade to Vista. Bunch of security updates, huh.  Get Firefox!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>really?!  now that is something I&#8217;m not happy to look forward to.  They should just cancel the release of SP2 update and offer Windows 7 as a free upgrade to Vista. Bunch of security updates, huh.  Get Firefox!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: نسخه ی بتای سرویس پک 2 ویندوز ویستا ی مایکروسافت برای دانلود قرار گرفت &#124; Pc-aras</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/comment-page-1/#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator>نسخه ی بتای سرویس پک 2 ویندوز ویستا ی مایکروسافت برای دانلود قرار گرفت &#124; Pc-aras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/#comment-725</guid>
		<description>[...] ماکروسافت می باشد تغییرات ظاهری یا اضافات بر اساس Within Windows در این نسخه دیده نمی شود [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ماکروسافت می باشد تغییرات ظاهری یا اضافات بر اساس Within Windows در این نسخه دیده نمی شود [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ricktendo64</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/comment-page-1/#comment-724</link>
		<dc:creator>ricktendo64</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/#comment-724</guid>
		<description>w00t

What about the list of updates</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>w00t</p>
<p>What about the list of updates</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/comment-page-1/#comment-723</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/#comment-723</guid>
		<description>Man, for a pre-beta build, it certainly speeds things up. Boot, login, startup, and program launches are all quite a bit faster. I can&#039;t wait to get the final build of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, for a pre-beta build, it certainly speeds things up. Boot, login, startup, and program launches are all quite a bit faster. I can&#8217;t wait to get the final build of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafael</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/comment-page-1/#comment-712</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/#comment-712</guid>
		<description>@Albert: I just received a tip from a friend, Microsoft didn&#039;t send me anything.
@DJxSpeedy: The version hasn&#039;t changed, use SP1 binaries. Thanks though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Albert: I just received a tip from a friend, Microsoft didn&#8217;t send me anything.<br />
@DJxSpeedy: The version hasn&#8217;t changed, use SP1 binaries. Thanks though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJxSpeedy</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/comment-page-1/#comment-710</link>
		<dc:creator>DJxSpeedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/#comment-710</guid>
		<description>When will the Patched files uploaded ? 

here the x64 files (ORG) : http://www9.zippyshare.com/v/24724830/file.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will the Patched files uploaded ? </p>
<p>here the x64 files (ORG) : <a href="http://www9.zippyshare.com/v/24724830/file.html" rel="nofollow">http://www9.zippyshare.com/v/24724830/file.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft released Windows Vista SP2 Beta Build 16489 to tester</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/comment-page-1/#comment-708</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft released Windows Vista SP2 Beta Build 16489 to tester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/#comment-708</guid>
		<description>[...] Source:&#8594;&#160;Within Windows [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source:&#8594;&nbsp;Within Windows [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vista SP2 Build 16489 for x64 &#124; Nic's Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/comment-page-1/#comment-707</link>
		<dc:creator>Vista SP2 Build 16489 for x64 &#124; Nic's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/#comment-707</guid>
		<description>[...] beta of Windows Vista SP2, as it was reported on several sites yesterday, one of my favorities is Rafael&#8217;s Within Windows blog. So you&#8217;ve probably already heard that there&#8217;s nothing much there in there and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] beta of Windows Vista SP2, as it was reported on several sites yesterday, one of my favorities is Rafael&#8217;s Within Windows blog. So you&#8217;ve probably already heard that there&#8217;s nothing much there in there and [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Windows Vista Service Pack 2 Pre-Beta Released &#124; Digital World ~ Stay on Top of Tech News!</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/comment-page-1/#comment-706</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Windows Vista Service Pack 2 Pre-Beta Released &#124; Digital World ~ Stay on Top of Tech News!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/#comment-706</guid>
		<description>[...] The release which has the build number 6002.16489 has a size between 290.7 MB to 296.9 MB. It contains all released updates but no obvious changes or additional features according to Within Windows. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The release which has the build number 6002.16489 has a size between 290.7 MB to 296.9 MB. It contains all released updates but no obvious changes or additional features according to Within Windows. [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DomZ</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/comment-page-1/#comment-705</link>
		<dc:creator>DomZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/#comment-705</guid>
		<description>Does youe IE8 build version upgraded ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does youe IE8 build version upgraded ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/comment-page-1/#comment-704</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/#comment-704</guid>
		<description>Where can I get this? I run a Vista blog as well but Microsoft doesn&#039;t involve me in any of this =(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where can I get this? I run a Vista blog as well but Microsoft doesn&#8217;t involve me in any of this =(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Windows Vista Service Pack 2 Pre-Beta Released - Computer Forums</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/comment-page-1/#comment-703</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Windows Vista Service Pack 2 Pre-Beta Released - Computer Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/#comment-703</guid>
		<description>[...] MB. It contains all released updates but no obvious changes or additional features according to Within Windows.  KB955430 is the hotfix that has to be installed after making the changes to the Windows Registry. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MB. It contains all released updates but no obvious changes or additional features according to Within Windows.  KB955430 is the hotfix that has to be installed after making the changes to the Windows Registry. [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Windows Vista Service Pack 2 Pre-Beta Released</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/comment-page-1/#comment-702</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Windows Vista Service Pack 2 Pre-Beta Released</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/#comment-702</guid>
		<description>[...] The release which has the build number 6002.16489 has a size between 290.7 MB to 296.9 MB. It contains all released updates but no obvious changes or additional features according to Within Windows. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The release which has the build number 6002.16489 has a size between 290.7 MB to 296.9 MB. It contains all released updates but no obvious changes or additional features according to Within Windows. [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asf</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/comment-page-1/#comment-701</link>
		<dc:creator>asf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/#comment-701</guid>
		<description>Why are MS changing the build number for service packs. Windows 7 will be 6.1 to help stupid programmers (IIRC), but the build number has no problem changing between service packs. Does that mean we no longer need to check the servicepack version in GetVersionEx. Vista SP1 was the first service pack in history to change the build number AFAIK (Win98SE does not count as a service pack, same with Win95 OSR2/3)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are MS changing the build number for service packs. Windows 7 will be 6.1 to help stupid programmers (IIRC), but the build number has no problem changing between service packs. Does that mean we no longer need to check the servicepack version in GetVersionEx. Vista SP1 was the first service pack in history to change the build number AFAIK (Win98SE does not count as a service pack, same with Win95 OSR2/3)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows Vista SP2 bêta 1 : premier aperçu&#8230; ! - Pinnula.fr - Actualit&#233;s</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/comment-page-1/#comment-700</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows Vista SP2 bêta 1 : premier aperçu&#8230; ! - Pinnula.fr - Actualit&#233;s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/#comment-700</guid>
		<description>[...] première version bêta du Service Pack 2 de Windows Vista. Aujourd&#8217;hui, quelques personnes (withinwindows) ont pu mettre la main dessus et nous dévoilent quelques informations sur cette [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] première version bêta du Service Pack 2 de Windows Vista. Aujourd&#8217;hui, quelques personnes (withinwindows) ont pu mettre la main dessus et nous dévoilent quelques informations sur cette [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vista SP2 Released To Testers &#124; IntoWindows</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/comment-page-1/#comment-699</link>
		<dc:creator>Vista SP2 Released To Testers &#124; IntoWindows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/#comment-699</guid>
		<description>[...] more @withinwindows   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more @withinwindows   Share and [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BraedenP</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/comment-page-1/#comment-698</link>
		<dc:creator>BraedenP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/#comment-698</guid>
		<description>I agree; service packs should improve on existing features, security, and speed. However, I think that they should make some more clear communication about what exactly, this SP is going to do.

Nonetheless, it&#039;s good to see them working, but quite frankly, I&#039;d rather see them working on 7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree; service packs should improve on existing features, security, and speed. However, I think that they should make some more clear communication about what exactly, this SP is going to do.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, it&#8217;s good to see them working, but quite frankly, I&#8217;d rather see them working on 7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HappyAndyK</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/comment-page-1/#comment-697</link>
		<dc:creator>HappyAndyK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/22/windows-vista-sp2-beta-build-16489-released-to-testers/#comment-697</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads up :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads up :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
