<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Short: Windows 7 to be called Windows 7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/</link>
	<description>Not your usual Microsoft enthusiast blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:49:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fat</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-2225</link>
		<dc:creator>Fat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 05:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/#comment-2225</guid>
		<description>@Chris
Its Windows 6.1 to improve compatibilty with windows API because they wouldnt under stand it coming back &quot;7.0&quot; Apparently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris<br />
Its Windows 6.1 to improve compatibilty with windows API because they wouldnt under stand it coming back &#8220;7.0&#8243; Apparently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dpvsti</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-2199</link>
		<dc:creator>dpvsti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/#comment-2199</guid>
		<description>&quot;99% Fat Free&quot; sorry!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;99% Fat Free&#8221; sorry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dpvsti</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-2198</link>
		<dc:creator>dpvsti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/#comment-2198</guid>
		<description>I think Windows &quot;Happy Meal&quot; might be sufficient, or Windows &quot;Less than 99% Fat&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Windows &#8220;Happy Meal&#8221; might be sufficient, or Windows &#8220;Less than 99% Fat&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrin Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-1514</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrin Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/#comment-1514</guid>
		<description>Windows VII</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows VII</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cato</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-1326</link>
		<dc:creator>Cato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/#comment-1326</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to pwn myself by posting this as I&#039;ve got no knowledge of the amount of irony and sarcasm among the posters here, but I think the basis of the result was:
Windows Se7en or Windows 7.

Since a lot of people are stupid, and can&#039;t understand that &quot;Windows Se7en&quot; is indeed read as &quot;Windows Seven&quot; and not &quot;Windows SeSevenen&quot; or something along those lines, Windows 7 was deemed the best way to describe the new OS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to pwn myself by posting this as I&#8217;ve got no knowledge of the amount of irony and sarcasm among the posters here, but I think the basis of the result was:<br />
Windows Se7en or Windows 7.</p>
<p>Since a lot of people are stupid, and can&#8217;t understand that &#8220;Windows Se7en&#8221; is indeed read as &#8220;Windows Seven&#8221; and not &#8220;Windows SeSevenen&#8221; or something along those lines, Windows 7 was deemed the best way to describe the new OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-1302</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/#comment-1302</guid>
		<description>I think I&#039;d like &quot;Windows 7&quot; as a name even better if the actual version of Windows was 7.0. Seems kind of silly to have Windows 7 have a OS version of 6.1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;d like &#8220;Windows 7&#8243; as a name even better if the actual version of Windows was 7.0. Seems kind of silly to have Windows 7 have a OS version of 6.1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andres</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-1163</link>
		<dc:creator>Andres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 01:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/#comment-1163</guid>
		<description>Windows &quot;7&quot; is a horrible name! Whoever likes that name should die in a fire. Windows &quot;7&quot; is a MUCH better name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows &#8220;7&#8243; is a horrible name! Whoever likes that name should die in a fire. Windows &#8220;7&#8243; is a MUCH better name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bg</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-931</link>
		<dc:creator>bg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/#comment-931</guid>
		<description>What about &quot;The (hopefully) best windows yet (again)&quot;???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about &#8220;The (hopefully) best windows yet (again)&#8221;???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator>John Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 20:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/#comment-849</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s with all the Vista 2.0 jokes? From what I&#039;ve seen from the PDC videos, Windows 7 has a lot of new features that I&#039;m pretty excited about (namely the superbar and Aero Peek).

As far as Windows 7 being the working name... eh, I dunno. I would have preferred an actual name, like they did with Vista. Then again I can&#039;t really think of a good name for it. Windows 7 kind of reminds me of when they named their OS after the year it was published in (i.e., Windows 95, 98, 2000). Is sounds kind of weird to me, I dunno. I guess I&#039;ll get used to it. Still, I was looking forward to a name...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s with all the Vista 2.0 jokes? From what I&#8217;ve seen from the PDC videos, Windows 7 has a lot of new features that I&#8217;m pretty excited about (namely the superbar and Aero Peek).</p>
<p>As far as Windows 7 being the working name&#8230; eh, I dunno. I would have preferred an actual name, like they did with Vista. Then again I can&#8217;t really think of a good name for it. Windows 7 kind of reminds me of when they named their OS after the year it was published in (i.e., Windows 95, 98, 2000). Is sounds kind of weird to me, I dunno. I guess I&#8217;ll get used to it. Still, I was looking forward to a name&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/#comment-721</guid>
		<description>Windows Ivan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows Ivan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NickelGreen</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-709</link>
		<dc:creator>NickelGreen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/#comment-709</guid>
		<description>I think Windows 7 is a fine name and it&#039;s well appreciated by bloggers and web surfers who got used since 2006 to this name. I think this is gonna go very smooth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Windows 7 is a fine name and it&#8217;s well appreciated by bloggers and web surfers who got used since 2006 to this name. I think this is gonna go very smooth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: _&#124;&#124;_</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-690</link>
		<dc:creator>_&#124;&#124;_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/#comment-690</guid>
		<description>Rafael ftw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rafael ftw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yert</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-688</link>
		<dc:creator>Yert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 23:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/#comment-688</guid>
		<description>Windows 7. That is all. I just needed to say it again. It rolls off the tongue nicely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows 7. That is all. I just needed to say it again. It rolls off the tongue nicely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rcazador</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>Rcazador</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 11:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/#comment-683</guid>
		<description>This is funny, You are saying they all prefer Windows 7. My recommendation is Vista Mark II or ummm.... Windows 2.0 or 7.0 or idk mb MSbuntu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is funny, You are saying they all prefer Windows 7. My recommendation is Vista Mark II or ummm&#8230;. Windows 2.0 or 7.0 or idk mb MSbuntu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jgoto</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>jgoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/#comment-678</guid>
		<description>You have my vote for Windows Vista 2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have my vote for Windows Vista 2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: werejag</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-674</link>
		<dc:creator>werejag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/#comment-674</guid>
		<description>maybe we can just called it &quot;vista SE less included crap edition&quot; or vista slice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe we can just called it &#8220;vista SE less included crap edition&#8221; or vista slice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#124;  Balu  &#124;</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-672</link>
		<dc:creator>&#124;  Balu  &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/#comment-672</guid>
		<description>Of course &quot;Windows 7&quot;

“Vista Release 2 Edition 2010 with built in Service Pack 1 Slipstream Professional”? I think that rolls off the tongue much more easily than Windows “7″&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; LOL :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course &#8220;Windows 7&#8243;</p>
<p>“Vista Release 2 Edition 2010 with built in Service Pack 1 Slipstream Professional”? I think that rolls off the tongue much more easily than Windows “7″&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; LOL :-D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 06:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/#comment-671</guid>
		<description>Tom, I agree, Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, I agree, Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-670</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 05:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/#comment-670</guid>
		<description>not even Windows &quot;Vista Release 2 Edition 2010 with built in Service Pack 1 Slipstream Professional&quot;? I think that rolls off the tongue much more easily than Windows &quot;7&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not even Windows &#8220;Vista Release 2 Edition 2010 with built in Service Pack 1 Slipstream Professional&#8221;? I think that rolls off the tongue much more easily than Windows &#8220;7&#8243;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bush</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator>bush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/#comment-669</guid>
		<description>and not Windows Bee?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and not Windows Bee?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Maras</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-668</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Maras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/#comment-668</guid>
		<description>Wait, you mean it&#039;s not going to be Windows Blackcomb?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, you mean it&#8217;s not going to be Windows Blackcomb?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taggerung</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>Taggerung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/10/13/short-windows-7-to-be-called-windows-7/#comment-667</guid>
		<description>I prefer &quot;Windows 7&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer &#8220;Windows 7&#8243;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
