<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newer drivers ARE better. Go figure.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/03/30/newer-drivers-are-better-go-figure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/03/30/newer-drivers-are-better-go-figure/</link>
	<description>Not your usual Microsoft enthusiast blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:40:37 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dav</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/03/30/newer-drivers-are-better-go-figure/comment-page-1/#comment-3206</link>
		<dc:creator>Dav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/03/30/newer-drivers-are-better-go-figure/#comment-3206</guid>
		<description>Hi, I have exactly the same LAN chip. I cannot choose 1000 full/half either. According the SiS&#039;s site it should support 1000mbps. The manufacturers of motherboards with SiS191 gigalan also state the same. Maybe we are cheated by them? It&#039;s actually a 10/100 fast ethernet chip but not a gigabit controller? I search in google for a while and seems no one with this SiS191 is able to get 1000mb/s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I have exactly the same LAN chip. I cannot choose 1000 full/half either. According the SiS&#8217;s site it should support 1000mbps. The manufacturers of motherboards with SiS191 gigalan also state the same. Maybe we are cheated by them? It&#8217;s actually a 10/100 fast ethernet chip but not a gigabit controller? I search in google for a while and seems no one with this SiS191 is able to get 1000mb/s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thaiger</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/03/30/newer-drivers-are-better-go-figure/comment-page-1/#comment-1747</link>
		<dc:creator>Thaiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/03/30/newer-drivers-are-better-go-figure/#comment-1747</guid>
		<description>Hi Ian,
I do have the same problem, i also cannot se where to chose 1000/full, as you write !
Please tell me when you find a solution, thanks in advance :-)
Kind regards Thaiger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ian,<br />
I do have the same problem, i also cannot se where to chose 1000/full, as you write !<br />
Please tell me when you find a solution, thanks in advance :-)<br />
Kind regards Thaiger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/03/30/newer-drivers-are-better-go-figure/comment-page-1/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/03/30/newer-drivers-are-better-go-figure/#comment-331</guid>
		<description>Can anybody get the port to go into Gig status (1000/full)?  It will not let me hard code it and auto neg to a gig port only comes up as 100/full.  I&#039;m guessing because I cannot hard code it, it is not supported?  Do others see the same thing when they go to the adapter&#039;s &quot;Advanced&quot; tab then the &quot;Speed &amp; Duplex&quot; settings (no 1000/full)?  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anybody get the port to go into Gig status (1000/full)?  It will not let me hard code it and auto neg to a gig port only comes up as 100/full.  I&#8217;m guessing because I cannot hard code it, it is not supported?  Do others see the same thing when they go to the adapter&#8217;s &#8220;Advanced&#8221; tab then the &#8220;Speed &amp; Duplex&#8221; settings (no 1000/full)?  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asd</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/03/30/newer-drivers-are-better-go-figure/comment-page-1/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>asd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/03/30/newer-drivers-are-better-go-figure/#comment-190</guid>
		<description>Vista SP1 has some improvements for large file copies to older OS&#039;s (WHS is based on W2003, so it qualifies).  If you&#039;re suffering from slow file copy from a Vista client to WHS, you might want to consider updating to Vista SP1 instead of or in addition to rev&#039;ing the drivers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vista SP1 has some improvements for large file copies to older OS&#8217;s (WHS is based on W2003, so it qualifies).  If you&#8217;re suffering from slow file copy from a Vista client to WHS, you might want to consider updating to Vista SP1 instead of or in addition to rev&#8217;ing the drivers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/03/30/newer-drivers-are-better-go-figure/comment-page-1/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/03/30/newer-drivers-are-better-go-figure/#comment-189</guid>
		<description>I installed the newer SiS 191 drivers on my mediasmart server last night. I have to say I&#039;m very impressed. With the original in-box drivers, file transfers seem to start out ok (20-25MB/s), but over the course of a large transfer (multi-GB video files), it would slow down dramatically (to perhaps 8MB/s). With the new drivers, the file transfer maintained a consistent 30MB/s speed over my Gigabit network, which I would bet is probably maxing the sustained write speed of the drives in the server.

This was just a single file copy, and I&#039;ll do some more testing tonight, but this looks like a very promising improvement for an annoying problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I installed the newer SiS 191 drivers on my mediasmart server last night. I have to say I&#8217;m very impressed. With the original in-box drivers, file transfers seem to start out ok (20-25MB/s), but over the course of a large transfer (multi-GB video files), it would slow down dramatically (to perhaps 8MB/s). With the new drivers, the file transfer maintained a consistent 30MB/s speed over my Gigabit network, which I would bet is probably maxing the sustained write speed of the drives in the server.</p>
<p>This was just a single file copy, and I&#8217;ll do some more testing tonight, but this looks like a very promising improvement for an annoying problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
