<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Live Messenger Team spreads 64-bit FUD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/02/20/windows-live-messenger-team-spreads-64-bit-fud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/02/20/windows-live-messenger-team-spreads-64-bit-fud/</link>
	<description>Not your usual Microsoft enthusiast blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:11:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jesper Lassesen</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/02/20/windows-live-messenger-team-spreads-64-bit-fud/comment-page-1/#comment-4540</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesper Lassesen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=41#comment-4540</guid>
		<description>It would appear Microsoft has moved / deleted the file, in the link, and its no longer availble. And they&#039;ve also come out with a newer version. This is a problem, because i cannot log onto my live, 8.5 anymore. I wount let me log in, without saying there&#039;s a newer version :

 &quot;Do you wish to install the newer version?&quot;

 &quot;Yes&quot; - It downloads, unpacks, and then says it can&#039;t be installed on my WinXP x64.
 &quot;No&quot; - The download box disappears, and i get moved back to the log in screen, and can start over. -&gt; Log in ?

 How do i either get it to quit looking for updates, or how do i get the newer version installed ?
 I&#039;d prefer the ladder one, of course. Thanks !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would appear Microsoft has moved / deleted the file, in the link, and its no longer availble. And they&#8217;ve also come out with a newer version. This is a problem, because i cannot log onto my live, 8.5 anymore. I wount let me log in, without saying there&#8217;s a newer version :</p>
<p> &#8220;Do you wish to install the newer version?&#8221;</p>
<p> &#8220;Yes&#8221; &#8211; It downloads, unpacks, and then says it can&#8217;t be installed on my WinXP x64.<br />
 &#8220;No&#8221; &#8211; The download box disappears, and i get moved back to the log in screen, and can start over. -&gt; Log in ?</p>
<p> How do i either get it to quit looking for updates, or how do i get the newer version installed ?<br />
 I&#8217;d prefer the ladder one, of course. Thanks !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jnapfvig</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/02/20/windows-live-messenger-team-spreads-64-bit-fud/comment-page-1/#comment-3548</link>
		<dc:creator>Jnapfvig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=41#comment-3548</guid>
		<description>YyTvAv comment4 ,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YyTvAv comment4 ,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sk...</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/02/20/windows-live-messenger-team-spreads-64-bit-fud/comment-page-1/#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>Sk...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=41#comment-311</guid>
		<description>Simple task. Download messenter 7.5, install it, wont run unless you update, click update, thats it, will run on:

Windows 2003
WIndows 2003 64bit


...you guys are welcome</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple task. Download messenter 7.5, install it, wont run unless you update, click update, thats it, will run on:</p>
<p>Windows 2003<br />
WIndows 2003 64bit</p>
<p>&#8230;you guys are welcome</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows Live for All! at Geek&#8217;s Anatomy</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/02/20/windows-live-messenger-team-spreads-64-bit-fud/comment-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows Live for All! at Geek&#8217;s Anatomy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=41#comment-206</guid>
		<description>[...] but the 64-Bit edition as well, this poses to be a bit of an issue for me. Thankfully however, Rafael Rivera hastely discovered that it was not the applications them selves that did not support these operating systems, but the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but the 64-Bit edition as well, this poses to be a bit of an issue for me. Thankfully however, Rafael Rivera hastely discovered that it was not the applications them selves that did not support these operating systems, but the [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Clayton</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/02/20/windows-live-messenger-team-spreads-64-bit-fud/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Clayton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=41#comment-204</guid>
		<description>I have been a loyal fan and user of xp 64 bit since it first came out.  I think it is faster and runs programs more efficiently than the regular 32 bit.  Now here to find out that we not only loose more support from the manufacturing companies, but now microsoft.  I have begun to hate the road microsoft has chosen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been a loyal fan and user of xp 64 bit since it first came out.  I think it is faster and runs programs more efficiently than the regular 32 bit.  Now here to find out that we not only loose more support from the manufacturing companies, but now microsoft.  I have begun to hate the road microsoft has chosen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pako</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/02/20/windows-live-messenger-team-spreads-64-bit-fud/comment-page-1/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>pako</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=41#comment-202</guid>
		<description>NOT sure why Microsoft believes their new Vista will boost the productivity of any sane person. Its so un-intuitive and lacking any logic in performing even basic user operations I had to abandon it only a week after I  jumped on it and go back to the good old XP (this time 64bit). Things a person does in XP with 2 mouse clicks are done in Vista with 5.
That said, to ignore two of the best OS this company ever produced (XP &amp; 2003) is, least to say, an act of foolishness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOT sure why Microsoft believes their new Vista will boost the productivity of any sane person. Its so un-intuitive and lacking any logic in performing even basic user operations I had to abandon it only a week after I  jumped on it and go back to the good old XP (this time 64bit). Things a person does in XP with 2 mouse clicks are done in Vista with 5.<br />
That said, to ignore two of the best OS this company ever produced (XP &amp; 2003) is, least to say, an act of foolishness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Withers</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/02/20/windows-live-messenger-team-spreads-64-bit-fud/comment-page-1/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Withers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=41#comment-199</guid>
		<description>Wow, even M$ has joined in the &quot;kicking x64 to the curb&quot; like every one else.

It&#039;s bad enough I have to jump through hoops to get hardware support for x64, now I have to jump to get M$ to support thier own OS.

Way to go M$. If Vista wasn&#039;t a bunch of crap I&#039;d use it. Looks like you jumped the shark on that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, even M$ has joined in the &#8220;kicking x64 to the curb&#8221; like every one else.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s bad enough I have to jump through hoops to get hardware support for x64, now I have to jump to get M$ to support thier own OS.</p>
<p>Way to go M$. If Vista wasn&#8217;t a bunch of crap I&#8217;d use it. Looks like you jumped the shark on that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chai</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/02/20/windows-live-messenger-team-spreads-64-bit-fud/comment-page-1/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Chai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=41#comment-149</guid>
		<description>To the WLM team: 
Pls do not marginalize us Windows X64 users!!!

We&#039;re the future and YOU KNOW IT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the WLM team:<br />
Pls do not marginalize us Windows X64 users!!!</p>
<p>We&#8217;re the future and YOU KNOW IT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messenger 8.5 really is 64 Bit compatible &#124; ProCookie Technology Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/02/20/windows-live-messenger-team-spreads-64-bit-fud/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Messenger 8.5 really is 64 Bit compatible &#124; ProCookie Technology Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=41#comment-123</guid>
		<description>[...] the final version of Messenger 8.5 does infact install and run on 64-bit XP and Server 2003 as proven by Rafael Rivera and Jonanthan [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the final version of Messenger 8.5 does infact install and run on 64-bit XP and Server 2003 as proven by Rafael Rivera and Jonanthan [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows Live Messenger 8.5 - 64-bit incompatibility &#187; D' Technology Weblog: Technology, Blogging, Tips, Tricks, Computer, Hardware, Software, Tutorials, Internet, Web, Gadgets, Fashion, LifeStyle, Entertainment, News and more by Deepak Gupta.</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/02/20/windows-live-messenger-team-spreads-64-bit-fud/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows Live Messenger 8.5 - 64-bit incompatibility &#187; D' Technology Weblog: Technology, Blogging, Tips, Tricks, Computer, Hardware, Software, Tutorials, Internet, Web, Gadgets, Fashion, LifeStyle, Entertainment, News and more by Deepak Gupta.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=41#comment-119</guid>
		<description>[...] the final version of Messenger 8.5 does infact install and run on 64-bit XP and Server 2003 as proven by Rafael Rivera and Jonanthan [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the final version of Messenger 8.5 does infact install and run on 64-bit XP and Server 2003 as proven by Rafael Rivera and Jonanthan [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows Live Messenger 不支持 XP64位，事实是怎样的呢？ - LiveSino - LiveSide 中文版</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/02/20/windows-live-messenger-team-spreads-64-bit-fud/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows Live Messenger 不支持 XP64位，事实是怎样的呢？ - LiveSino - LiveSide 中文版</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=41#comment-117</guid>
		<description>[...] 8.5 正式版的文章。但其中有一段引起了包括 Long Zheng, Jonathon Kay, 和 Raphael Rivera, 以及许多人的&#8220;反抗&#8221;： A special note for those of you running Messenger 8.5 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 8.5 正式版的文章。但其中有一段引起了包括 Long Zheng, Jonathon Kay, 和 Raphael Rivera, 以及许多人的&#8220;反抗&#8221;： A special note for those of you running Messenger 8.5 [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/02/20/windows-live-messenger-team-spreads-64-bit-fud/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=41#comment-116</guid>
		<description>Indeed... even 9.0 will install on Server 2003. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed&#8230; even 9.0 will install on Server 2003. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Live Messenger team misleads users about 64-bit support - istartedsomething</title>
		<link>http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/02/20/windows-live-messenger-team-spreads-64-bit-fud/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Live Messenger team misleads users about 64-bit support - istartedsomething</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.withinwindows.com/?p=41#comment-115</guid>
		<description>[...] the final version of Messenger 8.5 does infact install and run on 64-bit XP and Server 2003 as proven by Rafael Rivera. To be perfectly clear, the only hurdle prohibiting end-users from doing so is the custom installer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the final version of Messenger 8.5 does infact install and run on 64-bit XP and Server 2003 as proven by Rafael Rivera. To be perfectly clear, the only hurdle prohibiting end-users from doing so is the custom installer [...]</p>
<span class="comment-sorter-trackback">&nbsp;</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
